We're in desperate need of a receiver that can take the top off the D...Brown can do that.
he also cannot stay healthy
We're in desperate need of a receiver that can take the top off the D...Brown can do that.
We're in desperate need of a receiver that can take the top off the D...Brown can do that, when healthy.
We're in desperate need of a receiver that can take the top off the D...Brown can do that.
TY Hilton or Will Fuller would be much better targets for that IMO.
If I were Keim though I would try to sign Golliday though - I would go up to 20 million per for him.
Doesn't Fuller have bigger health concerns than Brown? I'd stay away from both. Hilton is another guy who'd fit the 2 year contract window.
Hope we arent one of those teams. I think Keim had a 1st round grade on him.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...have-fielded-calls-about-trading-nkeal-harry/
He is better than Kirk IMO.He is a solid wr is he though more reliable than kirk?
Also hope wouldn't be to much
If Pat P stays in the NFCW..... We should get Sanders immediately. hahaNah. He did nothing last year. A lot of better free agent WR's available.
Amen. How have people suddenly forgotten this? Drafting for need always ends up with busts.Saying we must take a certain position in the draft is the recipe for disaster. Because that leads to reaching, and we've proven over the years how godawful that strategy is.
Designate Pugh. He’s not a 9 mill player. Maybe that’s why Jones is being talked about as a guard.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_mediaxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Hope we arent one of those teams. I think Keim had a 1st round grade on him.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...have-fielded-calls-about-trading-nkeal-harry/
This mindset of not valuing more impactful positions than the lesser ones is why Steve Keim is the way he is.Amen. How have people suddenly forgotten this? Drafting for need always ends up with busts.
No, it's the mindset of thinking he's the smartest guy in the room and making wild reaches for small school kids is the reason he is the way he is.This mindset of not valuing more impactful positions than the lesser ones is why Steve Keim is the way he is.
I’ve never understood this concept. The less speed you have, the less margin for error. So if you’re effective with marginal speed the likelihood is you become worthless with even a slight drop in speed. The obsolescence of your speed would negate whatever technique you possess to make up for a complete lack of speed. Because there’s no natural law that I know of that says only fast guys lose speed when they age. They both should.
Whereas if you’re a speed guy a similar drop in speed likely reduces your effectiveness, but your speed doesn’t become a death knell. It would require you adapt to leverage more technique or smarts, which pivot would come at a good time for that . . . at the end of a lengthy career where you’ve likely picked up technical advantages.
here’s a hypothetical scenario: which do you think has a greater chance of success...
Player A comes out of college somewhat raw in technique but hella fast at 4.5 40. Puts up 10-13 sacks per year early in career based primarily on overwhelming linemen with his physical traits. Plays 8 years and his 40 time drops to 4.7.
player B comes out of college with an assortment of tricks in his bag and a “high motor” (isn’t that what we call all the successful slow guys?), but runs a 4.9 40. Puts up 10-13 sacks per year based on all kinds of tricks and tenacity. Plays 8 seasons and drops to 5.1 40 yard time.
I think player A picks up some tricks over 8 years to counter his lessening speed. Is he as effective as early? No. But he still has adequate burst to close on the QB.
I think player B becomes useless. Because he can’t count on anything to counter his lost speed. He’s already relying on his tricks and relentless approach, but no longer possesses any burst. At best he’s a clean up guy.
His future, imo, is related to Haason's and at this point, he sticks. And he's a starting OLB, not the 4th guy at this point.
Why is the franchise tag higher for ILB than RT then?
Also, a highly elusive QB (see Kyler) greatly mitigates the need for above average o-line (see Russ).
Also, the word “never” is not wise.
Because OL is an average of all 5 positions and the lesser paid interior players drag it down.
The reverse is true for ILB. Where OLB's push it up.