Stop the name calling.Mr. Smart Alec, please enlighten me with another Cardinal draft that not only secured 9 picks, but then set us up to own the 2024 draft?
Stop the name calling.Mr. Smart Alec, please enlighten me with another Cardinal draft that not only secured 9 picks, but then set us up to own the 2024 draft?
Quantity should not be the sole or primary measure of the quality of a draft. It's hilarious to put that out there before anyone has even taken a snap in rookie camp.Mr. Smart Alec, please enlighten me with another Cardinal draft that not only secured 9 picks, but then set us up to own the 2024 draft?
Quantity should not be the sole or primary measure of the quality of a draft. It's hilarious to put that out there before anyone has even taken a snap in rookie camp.
I did say “perhaps”. Did I not? Of course it will always be contingent upon how drafts play out. But, creating an extra 1st, 2 extra 3rd’s, and and an extra 5th has never been done by this organization in my lifetime.Quantity should not be the sole or primary measure of the quality of a draft. It's hilarious to put that out there before anyone has even taken a snap in rookie camp.
I think it's premature to call the draft the best ever, ahead of say the Fitz/Dockett/Dansby draft, when we've never seen these guys in the NFL before and have no idea how they will use the future picks. I'd say it in a more polite way though.Mr. Smart Alec, please enlighten me with another Cardinal draft that not only secured 9 picks, but then set us up to own the 2024 draft?
He can think it's the best based on current available evidence no?
That might change as more info becomes available.
Cmon folks, please read thoroughly before commenting. Did I not say “Perhaps”? The Fitz draft was a very good one, but it certainly didn’t set up the following draft with an extra 1st, 2 extra 3rd’s, and an extra 5th.I think it's premature to call the draft the best ever, ahead of say the Fitz/Dockett/Dansby draft, when we've never seen these guys in the NFL before and have no idea how they will use the future picks. I'd say it in a more polite way though.
Then there is no evidence for you to laugh at his belief right?There is no evidence.
Even with the qualifier, I still think it's a stretch to even use the phrase. Maybe it's just the way you phrased it. I think it's a fair argument to say this draft might have generated the most value for our picks compared to any draft we have had, but it remains to be seen if that pick value generated translates into it ending up being a good draft or bad draft. That's probably how you meant it and I'm just splitting hairs.Cmon folks, please read thoroughly before commenting. Did I not say “Perhaps”? The Fitz draft was a very good one, but it certainly didn’t set up the following draft with an extra 1st, 2 extra 3rd’s, and an extra 5th.
Quantity should not be the sole or primary measure of the quality of a draft. It's hilarious to put that out there before anyone has even taken a snap in rookie camp.
There is no evidence.
Not that these players will contribute to being the best draft ever... perhapsTheir college careers aren't evidence?
Getting Murray under center behind a guy who allowed 7 sacks last season is a recipe for disaster unless they want Murray to fail.
Yeah, I think he meant that more than how it literally came out.Would everyone be happy if he said "This is the best I've felt about a draft immediately following it's conclusion"?
That's what I took from it.
Lets see how many of those draft picks are starters?Mr. Smart Alec, please enlighten me with another Cardinal draft that not only secured 9 picks, but then set us up to own the 2024 draft?
Or even contributors. A great draft yields you three quality starters (meaning they'd at least be rotational players for a good team) in year one. A legendary draft gets you four.Lets see how many of those draft picks are starters?
Back on topic, I think Froholdt will start the season as the starting center, even though I don't think he should start the season as the starting center.
This draft and its trades gave us the best chance to have a great or legendary draft with all of the picks we acquired. How much credit for this draft do you assign to next year's draft assuming it is successful? If you have to wait for next draft to happen to see the picks that we acquire, even then you shouldn't laugh at the notion.Or even contributors. A great draft yields you three quality starters (meaning they'd at least be rotational players for a good team) in year one. A legendary draft gets you four.
The 2004 draft generated one likely hall of famer and three other players that got second contracts with the team (Dansby, Dockett, Antonio Smith). We'll be fortunate to get that with the picks we made and the ones we got in trades.
Meaning nothing, especially if we have nothingburgers for him to contend against. I for one would be very disappointed to see this outcome. I'm sure Kyler would be too.The Harry theme.
If and it's a big IF - Froholdt is the starting centre come September, he'll have beat out 2, or 3 contenders.
Back on topic, I think Froholdt will start the season as the starting center, even though I don't think he should start the season as the starting center.
You don’t know this; no one does.This draft and its trades gave us the best chance to have a great or legendary draft with all of the picks we acquired. How much credit for this drafted do you assign to next year's draft assuming it is successful? If you have to wait for next draft to happen to see the picks that we acquire, even then you shouldn't laugh at the notion.