Originally posted by SirStefan32
You're absolutely right. See what Sloan is doing with very little talent? See what FJ is doing with a lot of talent?
How about Houston? They sure look like a playoff team under Van Gundy.
Originally posted by SirStefan32
You're absolutely right. See what Sloan is doing with very little talent? See what FJ is doing with a lot of talent?
he got SCHOOLED by a couple of point guards that couldn't even make the suns roster let alone start for them.
Originally posted by frdbtr
Guys, the Jazz SUCK!!
Originally posted by matt_whitlock
I'm curious. Seriously, what is it that so many people like about Joe Johnson? Is it his 29% shooting? Is it his 2.5 assists in 36 minutes per game? I'm just trying to understand why you guys love him so much.
Hey, it our 1-3 start makes perfect sense to me. Last year we were below .500 when Joe was a starter too. Why should this year be any different?
Originally posted by matt_whitlock
I'm curious. Seriously, what is it that so many people like about Joe Johnson? Is it his 29% shooting? Is it his 2.5 assists in 36 minutes per game? I'm just trying to understand why you guys love him so much.
Hey, it our 1-3 start makes perfect sense to me. Last year we were below .500 when Joe was a starter too. Why should this year be any different?
Originally posted by Dr. Dumas
You are dead wrong with this statement. They sure looked pretty good last night. I do not care who plays for them, and that they do not have any legitimate stars. They also do not have any shooters on that team. They run the ball when they can, and when it breaks down to the half court they run set plays, execute properly and score points on lay-ups, pick & rolls.
If Phoenix knew how to run a proper zone defense, neither team would have been scoring last night. Instead the Jazz looked as if they didn't miss a beat with Stockton & Malone gone. It was the same plays I have been watching the Jazz execute for the last ten years (with the same result=win).
Originally posted by elindholm
I don't love Joe Johnson. He is a good athlete with many of the tools in place for an effective all-around game. He is fairly quick and strong, and he has some decent moves, satisfactory court vision, a concept of how to play defense, and a mechancially sound jump shot. What he doesn't have is confidence or consistency. Many people here, including me, believe that those are easier to acquire than the physical talents.
As you might know, Joe Johnson competes for playing time with Penny Hardaway. Hardaway has a confident court presence, he understands the rhythm of the game, and he is probably the Suns' best all-around shooter. On the other hand, he has no moves anymore (except in the post, where Suns guards are not permitted to establish position), he is careless with the ball, and he can't defend a chair. His strengths are probably comparable to Johnson's, but his weaknesses, by comparison, can't be fixed.
In other words: Johnson might get better, but Hardaway won't. That's the main reason he is generally preferred here.
Originally posted by elindholm
None of thier starting 5 would start for Phoenix and only 1 player on that team wuold make Phoenix's roster (Andre Kirelinko).
Ostertag is better than any center on the Suns' roster, especially when he is as motivated as he is now. And you'd better believe Matt Harpring would make the team. For that matter, both of their point guards are better than Barbosa right now.
Originally posted by elindholm
I like Matt Harpring but he plays the 3 position and we already are loaded with 3's.
The Suns are not "loaded" with SFs. They have Marion and some guards who play out of position there. Harpring can also play SG and is better than either Johnson or Hardaway. For that matter, he would make a better "small" PF than any of the Suns' current options for their small lineups.
In other words: Johnson might get better, but Hardaway won't. That's the main reason he is generally preferred here.
Penny is also one of the worst defenders on the entire Suns teams and that includes Casey Jacobsen.