Here is the link. Nice write up I thought would be a good read here.
https://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2...ssion-on-fans-of-the-patriots-and-cards-alike
https://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2...ssion-on-fans-of-the-patriots-and-cards-alike
That may be the best article Mitch ever wrote.
Naaa, she just overheard him speaking total speculation as absolute truth earlier and figured he was an insider with the team.Amazing. I have told a lot of people I am a high school teacher. Not one of them asked if i could contact Bruce Arians or steve wilks, or Carson Palmer, or Kurt warner or josh rosen or sam bradford in reply. People must be able to tell Mitch knows all about the NFL just by looking at him.
But, i loved the Jones trade from day 1 and even more so now.
Does anyone else understand this post?Naaa, she just overheard him speaking total speculation as absolute truth earlier and figured he was an insider with the team.
In all seriousness, his write ups breaking down plays and techniques are excellent. K9 wisely quality from a couple of years ago without the pretty diagrams.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Does anyone else understand this post?
I've actually studied some of THESMEL'S in an attempt to find meaningful dialog and I find gmable's to be comparative child's play.
Looks like I will be in the minority here but I didn’t love the way the article was written. Mitch makes reference of Jones being accosted by the police. All other reports state that Jones appeared to be praying or that he simply put his hands behind his head with fingers interlocked. I did not see anywhere that Jones was accosted, could be wrong but I feel Mitch purposely pit that in the story to put police in a bad light. Mitch does not appear like someone I would think has a direct line to Tom Brady by standing next to him at a grocery store line.
That aside, Chandler Jones looks to be a genuine and good man, and I always like to hear that about our Cardinals players.
The first part was a reply to ajcsrdfan's post and is related to a line in Mitch's article that ajcardfan was referencing in his post.. so I could see why that is confusing in context.Does anyone else understand this post?