Guessing Arians' Choices at QB

Lagerfilled

Professional Tailgater
Joined
Mar 23, 2004
Posts
1,578
Reaction score
785
Location
Amen Corner
Don't agree... I'd take Dennis Dixon in a heartbeat! He can throw, he can run, and he's gritty as all get out.
 

Gottalean

Rookie
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Posts
86
Reaction score
0
I don't want big Ben I would rather get Tony Romo if that's the type of move we make. I realy like Geno Smith, his stock is gonna rise in the next few months just watch, so I doubt he will make it passed the 3rd pick. but he is realy the only QB worth drafting in the 1st round. No to Tyler Wilson, No to Mike glennon. Cardinals fans seem to forget the most important aspect of a QBs game. accuracy! Both are horribly inaccurate! No more big arms that can't fit it in a tight window. if we do draft a QB that's not Geno I say we get Barkley.. I know I know another USC QB but he is not as bad as either of the other 2 Guys. he makes bad decisions some times but he can throw an accurate ball and has pretty good touch on deeper passes. Wilson has absolutely no touch on his deep ball and bad mechanics and glennon misses receivers bad and does it a lot. he is another John Skelton but not as good. if we can't get them then get nassib, Manuel, or Landry Jones in that order we can get one of them late so we won't waste a pick on a project
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
I dont think any part of that description brings Matt Barkley to mind.

Thats because you dont pay enough attention and are using lazy analysis. Matt Barkley is not Matt Leinart. He is not your typical "USC Quarterback" . Barkley may or may not be a success in the NFL but it wont be for lack of preperation or intensity.

Read the below comparison from Pete Carroll with the ultra intense and prepared Russell Wilson.

"Certain things that they bring in terms of responsibility; understanding the dynamics of the position; the requirements to run your life in accordance with that responsibility; working really hard; studying really hard; always being on point; being able to stand up in front of the team, stand up in front of the media and handle yourself; competitiveness. All of those things are the same."
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,312
Reaction score
11,386
Thats because you dont pay enough attention and are using lazy analysis. Matt Barkley is not Matt Leinart. He is not your typical "USC Quarterback" . Barkley may or may not be a success in the NFL but it wont be for lack of preperation or intensity.

Read the below comparison from Pete Carroll with the ultra intense and prepared Russell Wilson.

"Certain things that they bring in terms of responsibility; understanding the dynamics of the position; the requirements to run your life in accordance with that responsibility; working really hard; studying really hard; always being on point; being able to stand up in front of the team, stand up in front of the media and handle yourself; competitiveness. All of those things are the same."

lol, whatever. "Grit" in no way shape or form describes Matt Barkley, neither does being able to hit guys on their outside shoulder. This guy is horrible under pressure and really struggles to squeeze passes into tight places.

Russell Wilson was the heart and soul of a scoring machine at Wisconsin that won 11 games. Matt Barkley was the captain of one of the most disappointing USC teams in recent memory and the year ended with a locker room brawl because teammates questioned his toughness.

Comparing those 2, especially as leaders, is an absolute joke.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
lol, whatever. "Grit" in no way shape or form describes Matt Barkley, neither does being able to hit guys on their outside shoulder. This guy is horrible under pressure and really struggles to squeeze passes into tight places.

Russell Wilson was the heart and soul of a scoring machine at Wisconsin that won 11 games. Matt Barkley was the captain of one of the most disappointing USC teams in recent memory and the year ended with a locker room brawl because teammates questioned his toughness.

Comparing those 2, especially as leaders, is an absolute joke.

Actually Lane Kiffin is the joke and the reason for USC having a bad year but then again you dont pay enough attention so ill let you google "Lane" "Kiffin" and get back to me.

Ready?

Ok good. So anyway Ill take Pete Carroll 2 monthes ago - ya know the guy who coached them both - over an internet jockey. Thats just me though.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/wilson-378470-carroll-first.html

BTW I bet you were repping Wilson that hard before the season. You know before you had the benefit of watching the whole season like the rest of us.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,312
Reaction score
11,386
Actually Lane Kiffin is the joke and the reason for USC having a bad year but then again you dont pay enough attention so ill let you google "Lane" "Kiffin" and get back to me.

Ready?

Ok good. So anyway Ill take Pete Carroll 2 monthes ago - ya know the guy who coached them both - over an internet jockey. Thats just me though.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/wilson-378470-carroll-first.html

BTW I bet you were repping Wilson that hard before the season. You know before you had the benefit of watching the whole season like the rest of us.

I doubted Wilson because of his size, but the numbers were there. Barkley has none of that going for him, not the numbers, not the results, not the "grit", the laughable idea that he can hit back shoulder throws on a consistent basis and he has shown nothing of leadership.

And unless Barkley was possessed by Kiffin and Lane was forcing him to make those crap throws and crumble under pressure then the excuse doesn't fly.

And no, I dont remotely trust what Pete Carroll has to say on the issue, he is the farthest thing from an unbiased source.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Normally I think you are right---but with the success BA had with other young QBs, I think he is confident enough to put a rookie in there from day one.

But---what would answer both of our questions is a trade for a QB, which I think is a very strong possibility.

A trade for Big Ben may not be as far-fetched as some might think---this is just a hunch, but knowing the Rooneys, it wouldn't surprise me at all if behind the scenes they are looking for ways to move on from Big Ben.

Seems to me that we passed over Big Ben in the draft when he came out?? Now we might give up 4 or 5 draft choices for him? Truth is often stranger than fiction.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Get the best QB in the draft for once.
I'd modify that statement to: "Don't pass up the best QB in the draft if you feel he's a surefire answer to your QB situation."

Sometimes the best QB in a draft is nowhere as good as last year's best QB in the draft or next year's.

There are times when you're better off gritting your teeth and passing on the top dude if you feel he's too risky or can't get the job done. (For every Luck or a Manning, there's a Ryan Leaf or that 1st round bust from Oakland everybody loved).

Instead of worrying about draft ranking, we'd be well-advised to focus on a prospect's skill set (both current and potential), receptiveness to coaching and how much (& quickly) he should develop within the context of what the team plans to do offensively.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,600
I'd modify that statement to: "Don't pass up the best QB in the draft if you feel he's a surefire answer to your QB situation."

Sometimes the best QB in a draft is nowhere as good as last year's best QB in the draft or next year's.

There are times when you're better off gritting your teeth and passing on the top dude if you feel he's too risky or can't get the job done. (For every Luck or a Manning, there's a Ryan Leaf or that 1st round bust from Oakland everybody loved).

Instead of worrying about draft ranking, we'd be well-advised to focus on a prospect's skill set (both current and potential), receptiveness to coaching and how much (& quickly) he should develop within the context of what the team plans to do offensively.
Otherwise you might draft Leinart or Vince Young instead of Cutler for instance..

Or Alex Smith instead of Aaron Rodgers..
 

Metcalf Rules

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 18, 2004
Posts
2,387
Reaction score
2,959
Location
Great Falls, MT
QB:


Trade?

Ben Roethlisberger (PIT)---while the Rooneys appear to be content with Big Ben, they might be tempted to go in a different direction if there's a young QB they like near the top of this draft. The #7 pick could be very intriguing for them, as they could also package a deal to move up to the top of the draft, if let's say they are enamored with Geno Smith. Price? The #7 pick this year, the 2nd round pick in 2014 and the 3rd round pick in 2015.

Mitch, I'll see your Roethlisberger trade idea and raise you a Cutler.
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/1772...arians-thinks-highly-of-bears-jay-cutler.html
 

Gottalean

Rookie
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Posts
86
Reaction score
0
No to big Ben, yes to Cutler.

The difference between Young, Leinart , and Leaf is that these guys had good skill sets, yet thier. character was in question? And I think that was what hurt them in the end. Geno Smith may not have RGIII's. same skill set, but he undoubtedly. has the same type of character. That's Wat will be so appealing to NFL scouts, IMO
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,509
Reaction score
15,597
Location
Arizona
this is completely insane and why I can never take anything you say remotely seriously. The Steelers... are going to give up a potential HOF QB for a high pick in what everyone acknowledges is a QB deficient draft? Seriously... how the hell can anyone even begin to convince themselves this is even a remote possibility?

This. There is zero chance. This is not the same with Peyton. Peyton was at the end of his career in many eyes and for the most part people thought he would never be the same QB. They had what many considered as close to a lock as you can get waiting. So, if your Indy, it was not that hard of a decision.

Ben on the other hand is still at the top of his game and not a "re-tread" by any stretch. In fact, all the OC's that guy has had in his career, I am amazed he has done what he has done. If we could get our hands on Ben...I take him in a heartbeat....providing we can protect him. Having said that he is still one of the best QB's after a taking a hit. Here he might take it to a new level. LOL.

I liked the rest of original post.
 
Last edited:

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,656
Posts
5,410,459
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top