Lagerfilled
Professional Tailgater
Don't agree... I'd take Dennis Dixon in a heartbeat! He can throw, he can run, and he's gritty as all get out.
I dont think any part of that description brings Matt Barkley to mind.
Thats because you dont pay enough attention and are using lazy analysis. Matt Barkley is not Matt Leinart. He is not your typical "USC Quarterback" . Barkley may or may not be a success in the NFL but it wont be for lack of preperation or intensity.
Read the below comparison from Pete Carroll with the ultra intense and prepared Russell Wilson.
"Certain things that they bring in terms of responsibility; understanding the dynamics of the position; the requirements to run your life in accordance with that responsibility; working really hard; studying really hard; always being on point; being able to stand up in front of the team, stand up in front of the media and handle yourself; competitiveness. All of those things are the same."
lol, whatever. "Grit" in no way shape or form describes Matt Barkley, neither does being able to hit guys on their outside shoulder. This guy is horrible under pressure and really struggles to squeeze passes into tight places.
Russell Wilson was the heart and soul of a scoring machine at Wisconsin that won 11 games. Matt Barkley was the captain of one of the most disappointing USC teams in recent memory and the year ended with a locker room brawl because teammates questioned his toughness.
Comparing those 2, especially as leaders, is an absolute joke.
Actually Lane Kiffin is the joke and the reason for USC having a bad year but then again you dont pay enough attention so ill let you google "Lane" "Kiffin" and get back to me.
Ready?
Ok good. So anyway Ill take Pete Carroll 2 monthes ago - ya know the guy who coached them both - over an internet jockey. Thats just me though.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/wilson-378470-carroll-first.html
BTW I bet you were repping Wilson that hard before the season. You know before you had the benefit of watching the whole season like the rest of us.
Normally I think you are right---but with the success BA had with other young QBs, I think he is confident enough to put a rookie in there from day one.
But---what would answer both of our questions is a trade for a QB, which I think is a very strong possibility.
A trade for Big Ben may not be as far-fetched as some might think---this is just a hunch, but knowing the Rooneys, it wouldn't surprise me at all if behind the scenes they are looking for ways to move on from Big Ben.
I'd modify that statement to: "Don't pass up the best QB in the draft if you feel he's a surefire answer to your QB situation."Get the best QB in the draft for once.
Otherwise you might draft Leinart or Vince Young instead of Cutler for instance..I'd modify that statement to: "Don't pass up the best QB in the draft if you feel he's a surefire answer to your QB situation."
Sometimes the best QB in a draft is nowhere as good as last year's best QB in the draft or next year's.
There are times when you're better off gritting your teeth and passing on the top dude if you feel he's too risky or can't get the job done. (For every Luck or a Manning, there's a Ryan Leaf or that 1st round bust from Oakland everybody loved).
Instead of worrying about draft ranking, we'd be well-advised to focus on a prospect's skill set (both current and potential), receptiveness to coaching and how much (& quickly) he should develop within the context of what the team plans to do offensively.
QB:
Trade?
Ben Roethlisberger (PIT)---while the Rooneys appear to be content with Big Ben, they might be tempted to go in a different direction if there's a young QB they like near the top of this draft. The #7 pick could be very intriguing for them, as they could also package a deal to move up to the top of the draft, if let's say they are enamored with Geno Smith. Price? The #7 pick this year, the 2nd round pick in 2014 and the 3rd round pick in 2015.
this is completely insane and why I can never take anything you say remotely seriously. The Steelers... are going to give up a potential HOF QB for a high pick in what everyone acknowledges is a QB deficient draft? Seriously... how the hell can anyone even begin to convince themselves this is even a remote possibility?