Hartwell vs Hayes

CardinalChris

Big Man Himself
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
3,929
Reaction score
0
Location
Fresno, CA
We need depth, not a 4 mil a year LB. Hartwell can play inside and out and is about 245. He is an upgrade. And don't forget, Darling only played well last year. The year before he was miserable.
 

Snakester

Draft Man
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
5,459
Reaction score
2,242
Location
North Carolina
CardinalChris said:
We need depth, not a 4 mil a year LB. Hartwell can play inside and out and is about 245. He is an upgrade. And don't forget, Darling only played well last year. The year before he was miserable.

I just think Hartwell is going to cost alot of money at a position that we already have filled. This team needs to sign at least two if not three cornerbacks and a topnotch offensive lineman before they go after players they don't need. If we keep LJ Shelton then we just need to bring in another guard unless we are going to put Ross there.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
spanky1 said:
Hartwell is prime rib.....not that Hayes is chopped liver. The perfect combo is Hartwell at the "mike" and Hayes at the "will". Both Hayes and Darling can play the "mike" as well if necessary through injury.

Hayes struggled as the defensive signal caller.....Hartwell has been there and done that......and in the absense of a run stuffing NT, Hartwell provides some very needed horsepower in the middle.


BAH!

Dansby is better than all three backers you named.

Peace
:thumbup:
 

Tyrestud

Rookie
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
68
Reaction score
0
Location
Stone Mountain Georgia
Someone help me understand the terminology. The "Mike" is the middle linebacker and is normally the bigger, slower guy who is mainly responsible for stuffing the run. The "Will" plays the weakside and is the speedy guy who can cover the RB's and TE's when they go out. The "Sam" plays the strong side and is a little slower than the "Will"???
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
"A chance Hayes will be better", Hartwell already is a lot better. The important thing is that we needed to replace a "drag down" tackler playing the middle with a "step up & fill" downhill tackler. (I believe this has been an albatross hanging over our defense for several years).

I feel Hayes fits the new job description better than MacDawg did, but still represents somewhat of an unknown entity.

Hartwell fits the new job description even better than Hayes and has a proven track record.

Next maybe to Warner, of all the guys we've brought in, Hartwell's the one I want most.
 

KingofCards

My Hero
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
11,918
Reaction score
2
I can't believe anybody is against us getting Hartwell.


He is the one I want the most.

I think it is because of homerism over Hayes. He is one of the most widely overrated by people on this board.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
JeffGollin said:
The important thing is that we needed to replace a "drag down" tackler playing the middle with a "step up & fill" downhill tackler. (I believe this has been an albatross hanging over our defense for several years).

I feel Hayes fits the new job description better than MacDawg did, but still represents somewhat of an unknown entity.

Hartwell fits the new job description even better than Hayes and has a proven track record.

Someone gets it. :thumbup:
 

vini

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Posts
121
Reaction score
0
this is why the cards need hartwell here is the scouting report on hayes his game is really not tailored to play mlb in the nfl i think he would excell best on the outside with a hand down rushing the passer

Stength: Gerald Hayes doesn't wait for ball carriers to get to him, he goes right in after them. Gerald Hayes is an above average blitzing MLB. Gerald Hayes is a good athlete. Gerald Hayes is a good tackler. Weakness: Gerald Hayes is a bit small for an MLB. Gerald Hayes is not good in pass coverage and will occassionally misread the play. Development: Gerald Hayes is somewhat unique for the MLB position, in that he's better rushing the QB than covering TEs and RBs. Gerald Hayes was one of the most successful run stuffers in college football. Gerald Hayes should be able to step in and play on running plays. NFL offenses, however, are generally masters of disguise and Gerald will need to spend a lot of time with the linebackers coach studying film if he wants to turn into an every down MLB down the road. Situational MLB are not very common in the NFL and Gerald Hayes will not be effective unless the defense is designed with his skills in mind. Gerald Hayes is a good enough athlete to be a good special teams performer. Fantasy Football Rating: Gerald Hayes would be an excellent blitz backer and always makes a lot of tackles in the running game, so watch the first couple games to see how effectively Arizona uses his talents before deciding on him. Prospect Type: Skills Project. Gifted specialties - run stuffing, pass rushing
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,691
Posts
5,402,053
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top