Originally posted by Russ Smith
Yes we've talked about Northcutt before as another guy like darrell jackson that would solve some weaknesses. his advantage is he returns punts, jackson doesn't. Jackson is a better WR. I do wonder if them cutting Kevin Johnson makes Northcutt less expendable now? actually all things being equal I'd rather have Andre Davis or Quincy Morgan would be better fits for us since they're faster and better deep threats, but I doubt they have any interest in moving either. Northcutt wound up catching more balls than either Morgan or Davis so it's possible Cleveland may decide to keep all 3.
I really think the veteran WR has to be a guy who is a deep threat, Johnson can run but I don't think he's ever going to be a consistent long ball threat as the scouting reports said it takes him too long to hit full speed and he still tends to slow up on the ball in the air. I still think Darrell Jackson, drops and all, would make this offense REALLY interesting.
I would love to get Jackson, but only at the right price. If he wants more than 4mill. per season, I wouldn't want him, and I suspect that he will be looking for a contract above what I would be willing to pay.
I actually made a trade for Northcutt in Madden.
He fills the role of punt/kick returner, and dangerous third receiver. He would be a better fit IMO. With a core of Boldin, Johnson, Northcutt, and Poole, WR would no longer be a weakness.
Boldin would be a yac/ possesion guy, Johnson would be a pure possesion guy, Northcutt would be a yac/big play guy/punt returner wild card receiver, and Poole would be a situational big receiver.