How good is Booker?

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
I said two or three years ago that the Sixers had better long-term fundamentals than the Suns, and got laughed off the board.


It looks like it's starting to come to fruition for them. It may have been slow in coming but now their course is set. After this next draft I hope we are in a similar situation.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
Difference is the Sixers had 4 straight years with either the #1 pick or the #3 pick, so their talent pool picking that high is much better than where the Suns have been. We haven't had the chance to draft a Simmons, or an Embiid. We could've gotten the Greek Freek, but geeze, the Bucks really lucked out on that one. So following the Sixers plan...you have to just suck so bad that you're guaranteed a top 2 pick during drafts where there's practically sure fire stars.

But we scored with Booker and Warren. If we get a big out of this next draft we should be ok.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,488
Reaction score
9,700
Location
L.A. area
So following the Sixers plan...you have to just suck so bad that you're guaranteed a top 2 pick during drafts where there's practically sure fire stars.

That's the thing, though: You're never guaranteed a top-2 pick. Even the #1 lottery seed has only a 46.5% chance of picking top-2, and they're about to revise the system to make it even less likely.

The main problem with tanking is that you're still subject to the whims of the ping-pong balls. The Suns could, theoretically, have had the worst record in the league for the last three years, and they still might not be any better off than they are now. They should be thankful that they were lucky enough to get a possible franchise player at #13 -- that's a scoop not quite at the Bucks' level, but still impressive.
 

AsUpRoDiGy

Magnanimous
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
6,757
Reaction score
4,982
Location
Phx
That's the thing, though: You're never guaranteed a top-2 pick. Even the #1 lottery seed has only a 46.5% chance of picking top-2, and they're about to revise the system to make it even less likely.

The main problem with tanking is that you're still subject to the whims of the ping-pong balls. The Suns could, theoretically, have had the worst record in the league for the last three years, and they still might not be any better off than they are now. They should be thankful that they were lucky enough to get a possible franchise player at #13 -- that's a scoop not quite at the Bucks' level, but still impressive.
Well I know it's not guaranteed, but your chances are much more likely. The ping pong balls have never been the Suns friend...for whatever reason. Even if the Suns finished with 0 wins...we'd still somehow get the 4th pick. Just not fair.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
Well I know it's not guaranteed, but your chances are much more likely. The ping pong balls have never been the Suns friend...for whatever reason. Even if the Suns finished with 0 wins...we'd still somehow get the 4th pick. Just not fair.


I'd take 4th again! :raccoon:
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,587
Reaction score
57,994
Location
SoCal
Of course you would. And then we’d have to suffer through another year of you pushing for the team to lose.
So you don’t want the fourth pick. You’re okay with this team trying to sign FAs and make trades. Yeah great track record with those avenues of improvement.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
So you don’t want the fourth pick. You’re okay with this team trying to sign FAs and make trades. Yeah great track record with those avenues of improvement.

Far be it from me to speak for Chap, but I can tell you that I would be perfectly fine with the 4th pick, if that's how the chips fall. Fans rooting for the team to lose, on the other hand, makes me sick.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,418
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
So you don’t want the fourth pick. You’re okay with this team trying to sign FAs and make trades. Yeah great track record with those avenues of improvement.
We had the 4th pick this year, and it didn't mean a damn thing. You are wrong, but only because you aren't understanding the point.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,364
Reaction score
12,540
Location
Tempe, AZ
Would the 4th pick this year be enough to change things enough that people won't talking about tanking next season?

I know this draft is supposed to be more than a 2 player draft but I highly doubt it will truly have 4 or 5 franchise altering players at the top of the board. There will be some good players though, just like this year, and if we don't get one of the very top prospects come draft time is that enough to finally start building the team through signings and trades or will we need to continue bottoming out in hopes of getting the #1 overall pick to get that real impact player?
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Pick, pick, pick, pick, pick. Putting all of our eggs in one basket of unproven players. Waiting year after year, continually hoping that we luck out in each year's draft and that they all materialize and come together to become playoff competitors.

The Suns problem has been lack of balance. In experience. In scorers spread between the back- and front-courts. In offense and defense.

Tunnel vision on the part of the owner and GM. The inability to multi-task and address all of the needs.

It doesn't matter whether a team is "good" or "bad". Just that, most of the time, they are better than their competition.

There are winners and there are losers. Can anyone on this board say that our Suns have been winners? In a long, long time. The common thread -- dysfunctional team leadership.

And, as in some of the posts, insulting newspaper/online professional sportswriters and thinking that solves the problem. Yeah, kill the messenger that brings the bad news. 'Doesn't solve a thing.

Rooting for sports teams are meant to be an uplifting experience. To take our minds off the everyday challenges we face. To reduce stress rather than add to it. The Suns have not succeeded in that regard. Sadly, there is no hope in sight. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
So you don’t want the fourth pick. You’re okay with this team trying to sign FAs and make trades. Yeah great track record with those avenues of improvement.


They want more lopsided trades where we get hosed and get some other teams so so stuff. Oh boy exciting!

Yeah getting another high draft pick on a cheap rookie contract where we don't have to trade half our team away...that really sucks. :sarcasm:
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,587
Reaction score
57,994
Location
SoCal
Far be it from me to speak for Chap, but I can tell you that I would be perfectly fine with the 4th pick, if that's how the chips fall. Fans rooting for the team to lose, on the other hand, makes me sick.
So you want the fruits of the failure without having to accept the reality of what has to happen to get those fruits. That’s called voluntary dementia.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,600
So you want the fruits of the failure without having to accept the reality of what has to happen to get those fruits. That’s called voluntary dementia.
Disagree. You can be content with the record that it takes to get a good pick without actively rooting for the team to lose. It isn't even close to the same thing.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,587
Reaction score
57,994
Location
SoCal
Would the 4th pick this year be enough to change things enough that people won't talking about tanking next season?

I know this draft is supposed to be more than a 2 player draft but I highly doubt it will truly have 4 or 5 franchise altering players at the top of the board. There will be some good players though, just like this year, and if we don't get one of the very top prospects come draft time is that enough to finally start building the team through signings and trades or will we need to continue bottoming out in hopes of getting the #1 overall pick to get that real impact player?
Yet again you guys talk of signings and trades. Who is signing with us? Even pre-last year (which was the first year the suns overtly tanked) no one of consequence signed with this team. And now things will magically change? Why, because you want them to?

And we’ve made trades. How did those work out for us?

So far none of your suggested solutions have worked. Why are you still so against an alternative solution (particularly as it netted us Jackson last year)?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,587
Reaction score
57,994
Location
SoCal
Pick, pick, pick, pick, pick. Putting all of our eggs in one basket of unproven players. Waiting year after year, continually hoping that we luck out in each year's draft and that they all materialize and come together to become playoff competitors.

The Suns problem has been lack of balance. In experience. In scorers spread between the back- and front-courts. In offense and defense.

Tunnel vision on the part of the owner and GM. The inability to multi-task and address all of the needs.

It doesn't matter whether a team is "good" or "bad". Just that, most of the time, they are better than their competition.

There are winners and there are losers. Can anyone on this board say that our Suns have been winners? In a long, long time. The common thread -- dysfunctional team leadership.

And, as in some of the posts, insulting newspaper/online professional sportswriters and thinking that solves the problem. Yeah, kill the messenger that brings the bad news. 'Doesn't solve a thing.

Rooting for sports teams are meant to be an uplifting experience. To take our minds off the everyday challenges we face. To reduce stress rather than add to it. The Suns have not succeeded in that regard. Sadly, there is no hope in sight. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Difficult to argue with this.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
How good is Booker? This good. I think he can be the #1 star on a championship team. He needs a team around him, but I think that is where he will end up. He is close already.

He needs a 3 and D distributing pg. Does not need a slashing pg.

Needs a jack of all trades wing player. The kind of player that Jackson is supposed to become. Unless TJ really ups his defense and rebounding, I don't think TJ is the player.

He needs a versatile defensive big.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
And again, YOU AREN’T GETTING THE POINT. For some people, the 4th pick will not be enough. It wasn’t this year and it won’t be next year either.

Calm down Chaplin
..No one is talking about future tanks except the anti tank zealots.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,587
Reaction score
57,994
Location
SoCal
And again, YOU AREN’T GETTING THE POINT. For some people, the 4th pick will not be enough. It wasn’t this year and it won’t be next year either.

It likely won’t be enough. Once they get a stud (hopefully) this year they will have a plethora of young talent. That’s when the next step of fine tuning with strategic signings and/or trades for impactful vets (like Minnesota just did) comes into play to hopefully turn them into a true contender.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,459
Reaction score
18,363
Location
The Giant Toaster
How good is Booker? This good. I think he can be the #1 star on a championship team. He needs a team around him, but I think that is where he will end up. He is close already.

He needs a 3 and D distributing pg. Does not need a slashing pg.

Needs a jack of all trades wing player. The kind of player that Jackson is supposed to become. Unless TJ really ups his defense and rebounding, I don't think TJ is the player.

He needs a versatile defensive big.

I like Booker but not THAT much.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,656
Posts
5,410,459
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top