I know Russ has talked about this before but seriously, if Fultz is so clearly the best talent in this class why is that team pretty much the same with and without him? They lost to USC without him tonight 78-73 and they lost 82-74 when Fultz played. They lost to UCLA by 43 with him and 32 without him. They lost to Utah by 24 without him and 12 with him. And so on.
He scores his points but he just doesn't seem to be all that impactful especially for someone considered to be a transcendent player. And especially not for someone who mostly controls his own destiny on the court as opposed to, for example, a star center that might need a PG to show his worth.