juza76
ASFN Icon
I am trying to avoid making this about Murray and focusing on Rosen understanding that the greater likelihood is that we stay with Rosen.
Going by that, where will he be in 3-4 years
Having a top 3 pick next year
I am trying to avoid making this about Murray and focusing on Rosen understanding that the greater likelihood is that we stay with Rosen.
Going by that, where will he be in 3-4 years
I think that KK and Clements will improve Rosen. Rosen is smart and willing to learn. He is committed. I also feel that Keim is building a better team than what we had last year. I do like the players that have already been signed. Assuming we keep Rosen, we can get some really good players in the draft especially in the first 3 rounds.
IMO Rosen can develop with this coaching staff and team into a solid qb.
My bad Chris. I did mean aren’t taking Murray. Let me rephrase do YOU want us to drsft Murray? It appears many of your ost lean that way. Sorry if I don’t recall you posting your view on wanting Murray.
This is a very well reasoned opinion regardless of which player you prefer.I would take Murray based on his upside and value compared to a defensive player but that doesn't mean that those that want to stay with Rosen are wrong.
Safe play is to stand pat, take Williams or Bosa, and be happy that you have seen Rosen's floor and his most likely outcome is an average NFL starter (QB ranked 20-10)
Risk play is to take Murray because his upside is top 10 but he could also spectacularly flame out.
I would take Murray based on his upside and value compared to a defensive player but that doesn't mean that those that want to stay with Rosen are wrong.
Safe play is to stand pat, take Williams or Bosa, and be happy that you have seen Rosen's floor and his most likely outcome is an average NFL starter (QB ranked 20-10)
Risk play is to take Murray because his upside is top 10 but he could also spectacularly flame out.
Risk play is to take Murray because his upside is top 10 but he could also spectacularly flame out.
I think this also captures why the Cards hired Kingsbury
they could have gone the standard "solid coordinator with NFL experience" --
but in Kingsbury they are taking the riskier route -- trying to jump to the leading edge of offensive trends in the NFL rather than being a middle of the pack follower with a Adam Gase (or equivalent).
So -- at QB, do you take a guy who might be like Eli Manning, where if everything around him is very good, his game elevates just enough to win you SBs?
Or: at Qb do you go with a guy that has the potential to elevate the offense around him -- like Rogers or Russell Wilson? (Disclaimer: NFL comps given only as comps, not as predictions)
I think Mike B / Keim are so POd at themselves for going the "NFL standard" route last year they are ready to accept risk by the bucketful.
Interesting take on Rosen.
Completion Percentage
Josh Rosen completed 217 of 393 passes for a paltry 55.2% completion rate. This is, by all measures, fairly miserable. The average completion percentage across all passes thrown by 1st round rookie QB's in this study, however, is 57%. Had Rosen completed only 8 more passes across 2018 (less than 1 per start), he would have been above average in this measure. 27 quarterbacks register with a lower completion rate than Rosen over their rookie campaigns. Interestingly, Andrew Luck, Eli Manning, and Matthew Stafford are all players with reasonable sample sizes that completed a lower percentage of their passes.
https://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2019/3/22/18268320/a-statistical-defense-of-josh-rosen
So where does hiring Tom Clements, Rodgers former QB coach and GB coordinator, fit in?
Seems to me, they want to work with Rosen.
Why is his upside top 10?
Because of his college stats?
Because he won the Heisman?
Heisman-winning QB's have not fared well in the NFL.
How many Heisman-winning QB's were ever taken number one overall and won a Super Bowl (as a QB)?
One. Drafted in 1971. Had quite a mediocre career. More INT's than TD's. Career completion percentage of 52.5%.
You must be registered for see images attach
This is a very well reasoned opinion regardless of which player you prefer.
Agreed. I mean, I see the connection with Clements and Rosen. But that is trumped by the kingsbury/Murray connection.Coaching staff came together before it was clear Murray was not going baseball and was all-in on the NFL-- so working with Rosen was in mind
but Clements is NFL experienced support structure for a HC who has never coached in the NFL. I dont think it signals one QB or another. He has experience with two guys -- Favre and Rogers -- who were good working outside the structure of the offense. He would work for Murray as well
I think you are right in line man. We all get a little passionate sometimes and it is what it is. Opinions are just that. Opinions.. At the end of the day, we are fans that just want the best for the franchise.Thank you! I was called out justifiably for being snarky and getting caught up in the discussions.
I need to not do that
So where does hiring Tom Clements, Rodgers former QB coach and GB coordinator, fit in?
Seems to me, they want to work with Rosen.
Agreed. I mean, I see the connection with Clements and Rosen. But that is trumped by the kingsbury/Murray connection.
Or maybe he wants to work with Kliff.
I don’t know who’s going to be the quarterback of the Cardinals next year but I’m 100% certain the decision will have nothing to do with Tom Clements and who he’s worked with before.
Trumped, TRUMPED ?
How dare you politicize this debate!
Or maybe he wants to work with Kliff.
Interesting pre-draft twitter thread if you have time for it...
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media