How Much More Accurate Can Rosen Become

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,798
Reaction score
9,618
Location
milan-italy
I think that KK and Clements will improve Rosen. Rosen is smart and willing to learn. He is committed. I also feel that Keim is building a better team than what we had last year. I do like the players that have already been signed. Assuming we keep Rosen, we can get some really good players in the draft especially in the first 3 rounds.
IMO Rosen can develop with this coaching staff and team into a solid qb.

Improve yes probable
Improve enough to make this team competitive, I doubt
But I think we can stick with him, trading down and filling some of our roster weakness, and going into the next season (2020)with a better roster and just a glaring need, the qb position
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
My bad Chris. I did mean aren’t taking Murray. Let me rephrase do YOU want us to drsft Murray? It appears many of your ost lean that way. Sorry if I don’t recall you posting your view on wanting Murray.

I would take Murray based on his upside and value compared to a defensive player but that doesn't mean that those that want to stay with Rosen are wrong.

Safe play is to stand pat, take Williams or Bosa, and be happy that you have seen Rosen's floor and his most likely outcome is an average NFL starter (QB ranked 20-10)

Risk play is to take Murray because his upside is top 10 but he could also spectacularly flame out.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,342
Reaction score
40,460
Location
Colorado
I would take Murray based on his upside and value compared to a defensive player but that doesn't mean that those that want to stay with Rosen are wrong.

Safe play is to stand pat, take Williams or Bosa, and be happy that you have seen Rosen's floor and his most likely outcome is an average NFL starter (QB ranked 20-10)

Risk play is to take Murray because his upside is top 10 but he could also spectacularly flame out.
This is a very well reasoned opinion regardless of which player you prefer.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,245
Reaction score
14,305
I would take Murray based on his upside and value compared to a defensive player but that doesn't mean that those that want to stay with Rosen are wrong.

Safe play is to stand pat, take Williams or Bosa, and be happy that you have seen Rosen's floor and his most likely outcome is an average NFL starter (QB ranked 20-10)

Risk play is to take Murray because his upside is top 10 but he could also spectacularly flame out.


I think this also captures why the Cards hired Kingsbury

they could have gone the standard "solid coordinator with NFL experience" --

but in Kingsbury they are taking the riskier route -- trying to jump to the leading edge of offensive trends in the NFL rather than being a middle of the pack follower with a Adam Gase (or equivalent).

So -- at QB, do you take a guy who might be like Eli Manning, where if everything around him is very good, his game elevates just enough to win you SBs?

Or: at Qb do you go with a guy that has the potential to elevate the offense around him -- like Rogers or Russell Wilson? (Disclaimer: NFL comps given only as comps, not as predictions)

I think Mike B / Keim are so POd at themselves for going the "NFL standard" route last year they are ready to accept risk by the bucketful.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,778
Reaction score
24,391
Location
Killjoy Central
Risk play is to take Murray because his upside is top 10 but he could also spectacularly flame out.

Why is his upside top 10? :shrug:

Because of his college stats?

Because he won the Heisman?

Heisman-winning QB's have not fared well in the NFL.

How many Heisman-winning QB's were ever taken number one overall and won a Super Bowl (as a QB)?

One. Drafted in 1971. Had quite a mediocre career. More INT's than TD's. Career completion percentage of 52.5%.

You must be registered for see images attach
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,452
Reaction score
7,405
Location
Chandler
Interesting take on Rosen.

Completion Percentage

Josh Rosen completed 217 of 393 passes for a paltry 55.2% completion rate. This is, by all measures, fairly miserable. The average completion percentage across all passes thrown by 1st round rookie QB's in this study, however, is 57%. Had Rosen completed only 8 more passes across 2018 (less than 1 per start), he would have been above average in this measure. 27 quarterbacks register with a lower completion rate than Rosen over their rookie campaigns. Interestingly, Andrew Luck, Eli Manning, and Matthew Stafford are all players with reasonable sample sizes that completed a lower percentage of their passes.

https://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2019/3/22/18268320/a-statistical-defense-of-josh-rosen
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
I think this also captures why the Cards hired Kingsbury

they could have gone the standard "solid coordinator with NFL experience" --

but in Kingsbury they are taking the riskier route -- trying to jump to the leading edge of offensive trends in the NFL rather than being a middle of the pack follower with a Adam Gase (or equivalent).

So -- at QB, do you take a guy who might be like Eli Manning, where if everything around him is very good, his game elevates just enough to win you SBs?

Or: at Qb do you go with a guy that has the potential to elevate the offense around him -- like Rogers or Russell Wilson? (Disclaimer: NFL comps given only as comps, not as predictions)

I think Mike B / Keim are so POd at themselves for going the "NFL standard" route last year they are ready to accept risk by the bucketful.

So where does hiring Tom Clements, Rodgers former QB coach and GB coordinator, fit in?

Seems to me, they want to work with Rosen.
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
Interesting take on Rosen.

Completion Percentage

Josh Rosen completed 217 of 393 passes for a paltry 55.2% completion rate. This is, by all measures, fairly miserable. The average completion percentage across all passes thrown by 1st round rookie QB's in this study, however, is 57%. Had Rosen completed only 8 more passes across 2018 (less than 1 per start), he would have been above average in this measure. 27 quarterbacks register with a lower completion rate than Rosen over their rookie campaigns. Interestingly, Andrew Luck, Eli Manning, and Matthew Stafford are all players with reasonable sample sizes that completed a lower percentage of their passes.

https://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2019/3/22/18268320/a-statistical-defense-of-josh-rosen

I have no problem remembering 8 drops.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,245
Reaction score
14,305
So where does hiring Tom Clements, Rodgers former QB coach and GB coordinator, fit in?

Seems to me, they want to work with Rosen.

Coaching staff came together before it was clear Murray was not going baseball and was all-in on the NFL-- so working with Rosen was in mind

but Clements is NFL experienced support structure for a HC who has never coached in the NFL. I dont think it signals one QB or another. He has experience with two guys -- Favre and Rogers -- who were good working outside the structure of the offense. He would work for Murray as well
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Why is his upside top 10? :shrug:

Because of his college stats?

Because he won the Heisman?

Heisman-winning QB's have not fared well in the NFL.

How many Heisman-winning QB's were ever taken number one overall and won a Super Bowl (as a QB)?

One. Drafted in 1971. Had quite a mediocre career. More INT's than TD's. Career completion percentage of 52.5%.

You must be registered for see images attach

I really don't want to turn this into another Murray discussion. There are plenty of those so I will go simplest answer possible, multiple analytical indicators give that outcome.

That is only strong indicator though so he could totally flame out instead.
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
This is a very well reasoned opinion regardless of which player you prefer.


Thank you! I was justifiably called out for being snarky and getting caught up in the discussions.

I need to not do that
 
Last edited:

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
13,261
Reaction score
8,313
Location
Mesa, AZ
Coaching staff came together before it was clear Murray was not going baseball and was all-in on the NFL-- so working with Rosen was in mind

but Clements is NFL experienced support structure for a HC who has never coached in the NFL. I dont think it signals one QB or another. He has experience with two guys -- Favre and Rogers -- who were good working outside the structure of the offense. He would work for Murray as well
Agreed. I mean, I see the connection with Clements and Rosen. But that is trumped by the kingsbury/Murray connection.
 

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
13,261
Reaction score
8,313
Location
Mesa, AZ
Thank you! I was called out justifiably for being snarky and getting caught up in the discussions.

I need to not do that
I think you are right in line man. We all get a little passionate sometimes and it is what it is. Opinions are just that. Opinions.. At the end of the day, we are fans that just want the best for the franchise.
 

HGC

All Star
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Posts
953
Reaction score
1,046
Location
Chandler
I don’t know who’s going to be the quarterback of the Cardinals next year but I’m 100% certain the decision will have nothing to do with Tom Clements and who he’s worked with before.
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
I don’t know who’s going to be the quarterback of the Cardinals next year but I’m 100% certain the decision will have nothing to do with Tom Clements and who he’s worked with before.

Your 100% certainty plus 2-bucks will buy a cup of coffee.

At a minimum, his background points to how they'll modify the KK system for the NFL and given that his prototype QB was Rodgers, Rosen may be best to run it.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
Interesting pre-draft twitter thread if you have time for it...

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

And people think we are crazy for wanting one of the best QBs in college football history even if he doesnt have ideal height.

It's funny because Kurt Warner said that even though he thinks height can be an issue, he flat out said most of his throw were made by seeing between linemen NOT over them.
 
Top