I’m excited about 26 year old Conner

Does Conner upgrade drake?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 62.5%
  • No

    Votes: 12 37.5%

  • Total voters
    32

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,497
Reaction score
5,753
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Our running game depends more on our OL. And it looks like our 2021 OL will be better than our 2020 OL. Therefore Conner should be better than Drake.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
conner does not upgrade Drake, no, Drake left the team. So, Conner should have no impact to Drake.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,742
Reaction score
23,893
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I wanted nothing to do with big-game choker, made-of-glass Conner. Nice guys aren't always good players. Really hope I'm wrong, but it says something that the team with a backfield of Jaylen Samuels, Bennie Snell, and Anthony McFarland didn't want him back and want a 1st-round RB this year.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
I’m not excited, but it’s a solid signing. I think he’s basically a statistical wash with Drake. We didn’t get worse with his addition. There is a lot of upside if he stays healthy all season.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,710
Reaction score
10,590
I cannot believe anyone really thinks Conner is better than Drake.

That's just nonsense.

Drake did not have a great season last year, but actually has some wiggle and speed, Conner has neither.
 

Zeem_Freeze

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Posts
1,288
Reaction score
2,125
Location
Arcadia
only voted yes because he compliments Chase Edmonds running style much better than Drake.

play style + better oline = more efficient running out of Conner this year than Drake last year
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Drake was meh, Conner is cheaper meh.

I think Drake is slightly better than Conner, but the price is more than reasonable.
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,792
Reaction score
9,603
Location
milan-italy
Drake was meh, Conner is cheaper meh.

I think Drake is slightly better than Conner, but the price is more than reasonable.

Drake is a good back, maybe not a primary back but in the right offense can be a baller, that's why he has been paid
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,604
Posts
5,408,578
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top