He would be an immediate impact player at TE and help us counteract whats going on over there in Seattle on D. Of course Edge and the two WR's who should go nameless are a big help too.
Pariah said:You're right. With Peterson signing in Seattle, Davis might negate him. They'd probably have to have Peterson run with him in paterns--bringing him away from the run on play action and keeping him from rushing the QB on passing plays.
But, I really doubt he'll be there.
Skkorp, I know you don't like the pick, but that doesn't mean he's not a "good fit."Skkorpion said:Sigh. Vernon Davis is not a good fit. Give it up, guys. It is a rock-solid guaranteed sure thing we won't draft Davis under any condition.
Skkorpion said:Sigh. Vernon Davis is not a good fit. Give it up, guys. It is a rock-solid guaranteed sure thing we won't draft Davis under any condition.
Skkorpion said:Sigh. Vernon Davis is not a good fit. Give it up, guys. It is a rock-solid guaranteed sure thing we won't draft Davis under any condition.
Skkorpion said:Sigh. Vernon Davis is not a good fit. Give it up, guys. It is a rock-solid guaranteed sure thing we won't draft Davis under any condition.
Skkorpion said:Sigh. Vernon Davis is not a good fit. Give it up, guys. It is a rock-solid guaranteed sure thing we won't draft Davis under any condition.
Shane H said:He would be an immediate impact player at TE and help us counteract whats going on over there in Seattle on D. Of course Edge and the two WR's who should go nameless are a big help too.
vince56 said:40, I want VD too
speaking of which, where's your sister?
j/k
sinsay said:read this and then look how davis stacks up.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/9326200