Some of you are unintentionally making my point. You point out players who remain mediocre despite good coaching. You point out offensive lines that overachieved because of good coaching. You talk about lines deficient in pass blocking that made it to the Super Bowl.
What this suggests is that - despite the coaching and despite the reputation of the player drafted - part of the draft process is one big crap shoot. But...
If you play the percentages long enough, the odds tend to tilt in your favor. I for one would rather go into next season feeling the Cardinal offensive line is more a sure thing and less a question mark. If Thomas were still available at #5, I'd play the percentages and draft him. (Note - I'm not as confident those percentages would also apply to L Brown (that's a call for Keim, Grimm & Co. to make). On face value, Brown would be easier to bypass in favor of someone like Willis, Branch, Okoye etc.
But that's not my original reason for posting. I wanted to throw another draft curve ball.
What would we have to come up with in order to complete a trade for Faneca. (Obviously, it would involve more than a swap of a #5 for a #15 and we're becoming overloaded with guards). What if we threw in Milford Brown plus hmmm. Marcel Shipp or Bryant Johnson? Discuss.