I Say Trade Fitz For Lee Evans--Let the bashing begin

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,639
Reaction score
6,200
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
If having two possession receivers is such an albatross on a team's offense, then why would Buffalo give up Lee Evans? They'd be in the same predicament we supposedly are now with Josh Reed and Fitz instead of Q and Fitz. This trade proposal is misguided on so many levels.

Larry and the few other talented players on this team are part of the solution, not part of the problem. And if anything the front office would trade Anquan first considering he's three years older, comprable in talent, and will have a much shorter career thanks to taking so many hits.
 

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
Trading a good WR for another good WR would be pointless. The whole idea that Q needs to be freeded up is even more pointless, Q while really good isn't really that much of a game changer to warrant the offense being built around him. I also question whether a speed reciever to stretch the field will really make that much of a difference other than to please people who don't like Fitz.

If anything the Cardinals should trade one of their WRs for offensive lineman or a CB.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,639
Reaction score
6,200
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
What exactly has seperated Anquan and Lee Evans compared to Fitz Week 1 or their entire careers for that matter?

And don't mistake activity for achievement.
 
Last edited:

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
What exactly has seperated Anquan and Lee Evans compared to Fitz Week 1 or their entire careers for that matter?

Can't you read? Fitz is leaving the Cardinals high and dry after his contract is up, I am not sure why he is acting like a traitor but he is. He must hate the Cardinals their fans and all animals.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,214
Reaction score
11,795
Trading a good WR for another good WR would be pointless. The whole idea that Q needs to be freeded up is even more pointless, Q while really good isn't really that much of a game changer to warrant the offense being built around him. I also question whether a speed reciever to stretch the field will really make that much of a difference other than to please people who don't like Fitz.

If anything the Cardinals should trade one of their WRs for offensive lineman or a CB.

I'd trade either Boldin or Fitz for a top corner.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
86,226
Reaction score
36,360
Can't you read? Fitz is leaving the Cardinals high and dry after his contract is up, I am not sure why he is acting like a traitor but he is. He must hate the Cardinals their fans and all animals.

I think that was sarcasm but the only reason I even think the Cards might consider trading Fitz is his contract. As was pointed out when he signed it the acceleration on that deal kicks in and it gets VERY big, which was by design to force the Cards to restructure or sign him to an extension with another bonus.

That was the whole goal of his agent. And for the team, it's a logical time to stop and think are we going to commit to this guy for another X years and redo this, or can we possibly improve our team by trading him?

I don't think we will and I don't think we should, but I do think with a whole new staff it's not at all absurd to suggest that they could consider trading Fitz. Boldin's contract doesn't have the same radical acceleration IIRC so he's a little less likely.

I think one reason we did the front loading of contracts was to get a big cushion next year in case we decided to trade or cut some guys with big contracts and needed the room to eat the caphit. I don't think Fitz was one of those guys though.
 

red desert

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
6,221
Reaction score
0
Location
A.B.Q. in da house
Troy Williamson for BJ is a more realistic trade, IMO. I think Williamson is capable of turning it around and worth us taking a chance on him. He's only the fastest player in the NFL. And he's new and improved peepers.
 

OldDirtMcGirt

Registered User
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,255
Reaction score
0
The only Fitz trade I would've considered would be Fitz to the Raiders for Asomugha.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
86,226
Reaction score
36,360
Troy Williamson for BJ is a more realistic trade, IMO. I think Williamson is capable of turning it around and worth us taking a chance on him. He's only the fastest player in the NFL. And he's new and improved peepers.


Bj is in the last year of his contract so they'd never make a trade unless he extended.
 

Genus49

Newbie
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Posts
46
Reaction score
0
The Redskins are already desperate as hell for wide receivers.. Why the hell would they trade away their best one?



I'll have to see how Laron landry works out for them.. If he's anything like he was in college.. I would not mind sending Larry and Francisco or Holt down there for him.

Since when does Lee Evans play for the redskins?

Btw 49ers will take Fitz off your hands for a 4th rounder :D
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
37,911
Reaction score
23,888
I think that was sarcasm but the only reason I even think the Cards might consider trading Fitz is his contract. As was pointed out when he signed it the acceleration on that deal kicks in and it gets VERY big, which was by design to force the Cards to restructure or sign him to an extension with another bonus.

That was the whole goal of his agent. And for the team, it's a logical time to stop and think are we going to commit to this guy for another X years and redo this, or can we possibly improve our team by trading him?

I don't think we will and I don't think we should, but I do think with a whole new staff it's not at all absurd to suggest that they could consider trading Fitz. Boldin's contract doesn't have the same radical acceleration IIRC so he's a little less likely.

I think one reason we did the front loading of contracts was to get a big cushion next year in case we decided to trade or cut some guys with big contracts and needed the room to eat the caphit. I don't think Fitz was one of those guys though.

Part of what we did with this year's cap space was accelerate some of Fitzgerald's incentives to this season. I haven't seen how much that was, but it could only help in either trading him or retaining him.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
86,226
Reaction score
36,360
Part of what we did with this year's cap space was accelerate some of Fitzgerald's incentives to this season. I haven't seen how much that was, but it could only help in either trading him or retaining him.

Actually I'd forgotten that but you're right I do remember reading just that.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,170
Reaction score
11,981
Location
York, PA
The Redskins are already desperate as hell for wide receivers.. Why the hell would they trade away their best one?



I'll have to see how Laron landry works out for them.. If he's anything like he was in college.. I would not mind sending Larry and Francisco or Holt down there for him.

Becaus ehtey already have a burner in Randel El. Fitz would give them a big possesion type target. Not to mention he is way better than Moss.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
"Let's Make a Deal"

"Let's Make a Deal"
Let's not.

(It's a waste of energy to do the woulda, couldas and what-ifs).
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,214
Reaction score
11,795
Then I guess our coaching staff is lacking in good sense to have our punt-returner be someone that does not have reliable hands...they must be idiots to do something like that.

catching punts and kickoffs is much, much different than catching passes from a QB. You do realize that, right?
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
86,226
Reaction score
36,360
Then I guess our coaching staff is lacking in good sense to have our punt-returner be someone that does not have reliable hands...they must be idiots to do something like that.

In general his reputation at Michigan was great return guy, explosive WR, drops too many balls, and can't take a pounding.

I think that's why NFL teams downgraded him a bit they were wondering is he going to be able to take the hits NFL return guys take?

Remember he was leading JJ for the KO return job until he fumbled against the Chargers. Whiz was quoted as saying he liked how Breaston wasn't afraid to hit the hole, which probably to some degree meant he felt JJ WAS afraid to hit the hole.

Breaston seems to have gotten back into the KO returns at least he did during the Monday game. He's dangerous on Punt returns but he does kind of scare me he seems a bit careless with the ball?

I wouldn't say he has great hands but not bad hands either, just in college he was like BJ, when you really needed a catch, he seemed to drop the ball.

I like him as a return guy as long as he doesn't fumble.
 

JC_AZ

JC_AZ
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Posts
1,593
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa
catching punts and kickoffs is much, much different than catching passes from a QB. You do realize that, right?

Apparently his strengths are overstated in this profile from scouts.com

You must be registered for see images
Ht: 6-1 Wt: 179
Position: WR Date of Birth: 8/20/1983Class: RS - SeniorHigh School: Woodland Hills SHS
(Pittsburgh, PA)College:Michigan
2007 Scout.com NFL Draft Rankings (full list):Pos: WRPos Rank: #35Pos Rating:
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images

Scout.com Player Evaluation:STRENGTHS
You must be registered for see images
Competitiveness
You must be registered for see images
Elusiveness with Catch
You must be registered for see images
Hands and Concentration AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT
You must be registered for see images
Downfield Threat
You must be registered for see images
Strength Productive in a variety of ways at Michigan, Breaston is a third wideout at the next level who must make his mark as a return specialist.
Biography:Full-time starter as a senior, posting 58/670/2 as a receiver while averaging 11.4 yards on 29 punt returns with one TD. Junior pass-catching totals were 34/291/3 when he averaged 12.2 yards on 24 punt returns.
Pos:
Elusive ball handler also effective returning punts. Quick releasing into routes, runs well laterally and extends to pluck the ball from the air. Uses his frame to protect the throw, displays good concentration and is tough to catch in the open field. Nicely adjusts to the errant throw.
Neg:
More quick than fast and lacks the second gear. Not exceptionally strong in any aspect of the game.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
86,226
Reaction score
36,360
Apparently his strengths are overstated in this profile from scouts.com

You must be registered for see images
Ht: 6-1 Wt: 179
Position: WR Date of Birth: 8/20/1983Class: RS - SeniorHigh School: Woodland Hills SHS
(Pittsburgh, PA)College:Michigan
2007 Scout.com NFL Draft Rankings (full list):Pos: WRPos Rank: #35Pos Rating:
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images

Scout.com Player Evaluation:STRENGTHS
You must be registered for see images
Competitiveness
You must be registered for see images
Elusiveness with Catch
You must be registered for see images
Hands and Concentration AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT
You must be registered for see images
Downfield Threat
You must be registered for see images
Strength Productive in a variety of ways at Michigan, Breaston is a third wideout at the next level who must make his mark as a return specialist.
Biography:Full-time starter as a senior, posting 58/670/2 as a receiver while averaging 11.4 yards on 29 punt returns with one TD. Junior pass-catching totals were 34/291/3 when he averaged 12.2 yards on 24 punt returns.
Pos:
Elusive ball handler also effective returning punts. Quick releasing into routes, runs well laterally and extends to pluck the ball from the air. Uses his frame to protect the throw, displays good concentration and is tough to catch in the open field. Nicely adjusts to the errant throw.
Neg:
More quick than fast and lacks the second gear. Not exceptionally strong in any aspect of the game.


ESPN's scouts inc said he drops too many passes. NFL scouts.com said he's a body catcher who shies away from contact, but that has has excellent ball security on returns, and is much better at looking in the ball on returns than he is as a WR.

That's my take too, as a WR he drops balls because he's afraid of getting hit, at least he was in college. AS a return guy for whatever reason that didn't show as much.
http://www.azcardinal.com/07DWR.htm

That's from Jeff Gollin's site they had Breaston rated 12 so scroll down you'll see a bunch of scouting reports.

Not a bad prospect but he didn't make the jump at WR that people expected at Michigan.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
547,493
Posts
5,351,649
Members
6,304
Latest member
Dbacks05
Top