I think it's Bennett...

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,264
Reaction score
15,326
Location
Charlotte
The more I think about it...the more I think it will be Bennett.

I would still rather have Henry but I think Green will go with the 3 headed monster at RB (Bennett/Shipp/Hambrick).

A pretty good chance it will be the NE 3rd rd pick.
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
That would be an awesome pickup for the Cards. If we could also trade LJ for a pick, whew it would be awesome.

I would love to possibly pick up a CB, QB, RB, FS, OG
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
I would love to have Bennett

if he can stay healthy but isn't the Pats third round pick more like a fourth rounder really since they won the Superbowl and therefore they pick last in the round. But I guess it would give the Vikes the last pick on day one.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,587
Reaction score
5,432
Location
Fort Myers
You have to worry about the guy's durability. If we do get him we had better draft another RB early.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
You have to worry about the guy's durability. If we do get him we had better draft another RB early.
Only Tom Knight has proved to be less durable.

If Green abandons his MO and drafts for need, I would love seeing us drafting a corner (Rolle, Pac or Rogers) with our #8 and Arrington at #44.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Even though he's injury prone, we do have VERY capable backups in Shipp and Hambrick. For a late 3rd rounder that's a pretty good gamble and a darn good stable of RBs, IMO.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,583
Reaction score
15,843
Location
Plainfield, Il.
The Vikings will not settle for the 96th pick in the draft. Bennett would be a great addition but we would still have to draft a back at least by the second round. A guy like Fason or Arrington. We would have to be ready in case Bennett was to break down or we would be in back to square 1.

I love Shipp, but I cannot consider him on our depth chart until he gets on the field and runs.

The real sleeper is Hambrick. He might have pulled his head out of his a$$ and realized he could be a starter in the nfl. He showed some spark when he came in last year , especially when you consider he was out of shape. I don't think the Cards would have resigned him if he wasn't looking in anything but great shape. That being said , I'm not ready to hitch the wagon to him just yet.

We need 2 speedy backs on this team when the season opens. I kinda hope Darrin Sproles is one of them. I got a feeling this kids got a chip on his shoulder and create all kinds of havoc on return teams, 3rd downs and any time we really wanted to "spread" the defense.
 

btb54

Newbie
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Posts
5
Reaction score
0
I am a newly registered member ,although I have been reading this forum for about 3yrs.I have been a Cardinals fan since 1966.I decided to start posting due to the excitement I am feeling about the upcoming season.I would just like add that Darren Sproles,although small is the qwickest back I have seen since Barry Sanders and would be a great 4th round choice.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
The Vikings will not settle for the 96th pick in the draft.
Actually, while I'm not all that excited about Bennett, I could dig Bennett for our #96, because I never felt RB was that high a priority in the first place (For example, I still have that image of Damien Anderson slanting off RT behind Joshua Rue for two long TD runs). If our O-line can run block, I could live with Kerry's "3-headed monster" of Shipp, Hambrick and Bennett (or if the deal can't get done Anderson), while using our other draft picks and existing FA cap money to address other priorities.

Regarding the possible Vike reluctance to part with Bennett for a #96 - what are they going to do with their surplus of running backs once everyone is healthy? They can't be thrilled with the idea of wasting a roster spot (and possibly cap dollars) on guys who aren't contributing to the team's success any more than we are.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
Jeff you are right on target with this. I think Green has also been on target all the time with wanting Bennett. We may not get him till just before the draft..But I believe we will.

GBR
40
 

Capt'nCard

Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Posts
151
Reaction score
0
Location
Tempe
JeffGollin said:
You have to worry about the guy's durability. If we do get him we had better draft another RB early.
Only Tom Knight has proved to be less durable.

If Green abandons his MO and drafts for need, I would love seeing us drafting a corner (Rolle, Pac or Rogers) with our #8 and Arrington at #44.
I would love to see Arrington at #44!! :thumbup:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,841
Posts
5,403,350
Members
6,315
Latest member
SewingChick65
Top