If possible, should we Trade out R1 pick for a mid 2nd and mid 3rd

Should we trade our R1 for a mid 2nd and mid 3rd

  • Yes, we need the extra pick more than any player available at end of R1

    Votes: 13 56.5%
  • No, any R1 player would be more valuable to us than 2 & 3 round picks

    Votes: 9 39.1%
  • Doesn't matter since both situations are very limiting

    Votes: 1 4.3%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .

jw7

Woof!
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Posts
8,194
Reaction score
7
Location
Ahwatukee
Nobody is going to trade up for a #29 pick. Won't happen.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,174
Reaction score
16,250
Location
Modesto, California
nope. There will be a few guys available between 29, and say...35...that can have a major impact on this team...... but there will still be guys in the third that can have an impact...to me,...a major impact player is a better addition than two or three impact players, or an impact player and two contributors. We can get a starter in the third, but we can score a perennial pro bowler at 29
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
34,978
Reaction score
21,080
Location
South Bay
In 2014, for the Vikings to move up 8 spots from 40 to 32 to take Bridgewater, they had to give Seattle their 2nd round pick (40) and their 4th round pick (108).

The Saints's 2nd and 3rd round picks would be good value, IMO. Of course, the Saints would have to fall in love with someone at that spot and there would have to be nobody AZ values at the time.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
I agree with you Bucky, and Paxton Lynch could be that guy. It's a QB driven league.

+1

And Drew Brees is not getting any younger.


I am find with staying at #29, since I think there will be definitely be a player the Cardinals could use sitting there for them at that spot, but I think the same thing about picking about 16 slots later, so picking up an extra 3rd round pick in the process would be great too.

Either, or.
 

Ohcrap75

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Posts
1,270
Reaction score
723
Teams will be willing to trade up to get the extra year option on the contract too. TJ's example is probably best case for me if an elite player doesn't fall to #29. SD could possible want trade up for OT giving us #35 and #102. Dropping only six spots should still leave us in position to draft a talented DE or Ryan Kelly while adding a very valuable pick at #102.
 

Cardsfanstl

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Posts
3,239
Reaction score
786
Location
St. Louis
Not much difference players 29-40 so if some team really wants to trade up a 33-40 rd 2 pick along with a 3rd or 4th is logical.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
Happens a lot

Not for a second and third :D

Last late first round trade down was a couple years ago.

MIN traded #40 (2nd round) & #108 (4th round) in 2014 to SEA to move up to #32 to take Teddy Bridgewater. Definitely a great deal for MIN. SEA ended up taking Paul Richardson & Cassius Marsh after a series of trade downs.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Nobody is going to trade up for a #29 pick. Won't happen.

It could absolutely happen. In fact, id say its likely to happen.


Specifically: Any team who needs a QB (the top 10) who misses out on Wentz or Goff will be looking to come back and grab Paxton Lynch at #29. All of them will fight each other to get the pick. Thus we have the leverage. You know who needs a QB? Denver. I hear they like Lynch. Maybe one of the other early round 2 team wants to jump them and grab him.

another one: New York. Ferguson retired today, meaning they need a LT. Lots of good LTs in this draft. They could be looking to come back at #29 and take Conklin or Decker or Ifredi.


I think we have excellent odds. Because we are the rare late pick team that has very few holes. We can trade away our 1st at ease. Denver, lots of holes, they need their pick. Same with Carolina.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,174
Reaction score
16,250
Location
Modesto, California
It could absolutely happen. In fact, id say its likely to happen.


Specifically: Any team who needs a QB (the top 10) who misses out on Wentz or Goff will be looking to come back and grab Paxton Lynch at #29. All of them will fight each other to get the pick. Thus we have the leverage. You know who needs a QB? Denver. I hear they like Lynch. Maybe one of the other early round 2 team wants to jump them and grab him.

another one: New York. Ferguson retired today, meaning they need a LT. Lots of good LTs in this draft. They could be looking to come back at #29 and take Conklin or Decker or Ifredi.


I think we have excellent odds. Because we are the rare late pick team that has very few holes. We can trade away our 1st at ease. Denver, lots of holes, they need their pick. Same with Carolina.



so....we trade #29 to the saints,...for Max Unger and their 3rd?
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
It could absolutely happen. In fact, id say its likely to happen.


Specifically: Any team who needs a QB (the top 10) who misses out on Wentz or Goff will be looking to come back and grab Paxton Lynch at #29. All of them will fight each other to get the pick. Thus we have the leverage. You know who needs a QB? Denver. I hear they like Lynch. Maybe one of the other early round 2 team wants to jump them and grab him.

another one: New York. Ferguson retired today, meaning they need a LT. Lots of good LTs in this draft. They could be looking to come back at #29 and take Conklin or Decker or Ifredi.


I think we have excellent odds. Because we are the rare late pick team that has very few holes. We can trade away our 1st at ease. Denver, lots of holes, they need their pick. Same with Carolina.

If several teams want Lynch they won't be waiting until #29 to cut a deal.

If he gets past the RAMS at #15 the rush for him starts.
 
Last edited:

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
so....we trade #29 to the saints,...for Max Unger and their 3rd?

That would say to me that the Saints only think Graham was worth a 3rd. Not happening.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
so....we trade #29 to the saints,...for Max Unger and their 3rd?

No...whered this Max Unger talk come from?

Just trade back to #37 or so and take Ryan Kelly.

If several teams want Lynch they won't be waiting until #29 to cut a deal.

If he gets past the RAMS at #15 the rush for him starts.

Happened a couple of years ago when the Vikings traded to #32 to draft Bridgewater.

You over estimate Lynch

Bridgewater was better, Carr was better. they went 32 and 36. And look at Johnny Manziel. There were fans thinking hed go with the #8 pick, but the Browns came back at #22 to get him.

#29 feels like the perfect trade back for Lynch range


Furthermore, teams in the low 20s will want a ransom. Obviously the team looking to get back in and get Lynch will want the best deal. AZ at #29 is a very reasonable bargain. Your 2nd + 3rd rounder
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
I don't think a 2nd and 3rd is out of the question for pick 29. You figure the team trading already has made a 1st round pick so they'd basically just be giving up a 3rd round pick to turn their 2nd round pick into a late 1st rounder. That's not a big price to pay.
 
OP
OP
SissyBoyFloyd

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
Just ran simulation on that new Draftwired site (by the way it is super good and worth every bit of the $6 to join), and for you Ryan Kelly fans, here is what we could pick up by trading back with say the Saints.

2.16 Ryan Kelly, C (personally I preferred Chris Jones, Leonard Floyd, or Su'a Cravens*
3.15 Will Redmond, CB (or the likes of Kaufusi, Wright, Killebrew, Jerell Adams)
3.29 T J Green (or the likes of Jones, Calhoun, Ward, Hackenberg)


So moving back would give you that 3.15 type of player as a free pick.



*Love this guy - so versatile, fast, and in a way the USC version of Myles Jack
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
SissyBoyFloyd

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
Here is a mock after trade back with Ravens. I happen to like this group of players, especially with the surprise drop to R5 by the ND chap.

2.36 Butler, Vernon NT Louisiana Tech (36, 104 from BAL for 29)
3.92 Russell, KeiVarae CB Notre Dame
4.104 Clark, Le'Raven G Texas Tech (36, 104 from BAL for 29)
4.128 Glasgow, Graham C Michigan
5.166 Jones, Cardale QB Ohio State
5.170 Day, Sheldon DT Notre Dame
6.204 Morrison, Antonio ILB Florida

Here is a mock minus any Trades:

1.29 Ragland, Reggie ILB Alabama
3.92 Redmond, Will CB Mississippi State
4.128 Day, Sheldon DT Notre Dame
5.166 Seumalo, Isaac C Oregon State
5.170 Peake, Charone WR Clemson
6.204 Hall, Deiondre' FS Northern Iowa
 
Last edited:

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
No...whered this Max Unger talk come from?

Just trade back to #37 or so and take Ryan Kelly.





You over estimate Lynch

Bridgewater was better, Carr was better. they went 32 and 36. And look at Johnny Manziel. There were fans thinking hed go with the #8 pick, but the Browns came back at #22 to get him.

#29 feels like the perfect trade back for Lynch range


Furthermore, teams in the low 20s will want a ransom. Obviously the team looking to get back in and get Lynch will want the best deal. AZ at #29 is a very reasonable bargain. Your 2nd + 3rd rounder

Denver, for example, picking at the end of the first could create an affordable deal without waiting until #29. He may not be as good a prospect as those you mentioned but he's the best available after the first two are off the board in 2016.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,594
Posts
5,408,559
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top