If We Trade #3 - What would you take?

OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,492
Reaction score
41,047
Location
UK
I even think Chicago takes Carter over Anderson since they just moved to a 4-3 last offseason.

I can't see it but I hope so. They were #32 in sacks this year with only 20. They need a big time Edge and I think Anderson can play 4-3 DE. He makes up for weight with strength.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,717
Reaction score
10,617
I'm just not very hot on DT's that high. I think they struggle to transition and guys that looks great in college against future truckers struggle vs much stronger, faster and more experienced NFL players.

And Carter has 6 career sacks in 35 career games and 18.5 TFL's. There's a lot of "He's so strong and he gets a tonne of pressures but hasn't had the production because Georgia rotate the line so much" or "He's been playing injured". I get that.

But that asks the question "Can he handle an NFL workload?" He played 396 snaps in 2021 (40%) and 308 snaps in 2022. In the NFL he's going to need to play 800+ snaps a year. That's a massive leap.

I'm just not comfortable projecting DT's at #3 that don't have steller college production and such limited play time.

I feel there's more projection and hope there than with Anderson. So if Anderson is gone and it's Carter or trade back I think I'd take the trade back.
I'm even more radical than you. I think the only DT I have ever seen I think is worthy of a top 10 pick is Aaron Donald. Pretty sure Carter is not that.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,252
Reaction score
12,220
Location
York, PA
I can't see it but I hope so. They were #32 in sacks this year with only 20. They need a big time Edge and I think Anderson can play 4-3 DE. He makes up for weight with strength.
Yes. Anderson can play in both with his overall package of speed, strength, and explosiveness. Sadly, I don’t see any way that he’s around at 3. The Bears will scoop him up in a heartbeat. The only hope we have is if the Colts offer them the moon & stars to move up into 1 to take a QB.
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
8,158
Reaction score
12,277
Location
St Louis, MO
Sooo…

It wasn’t the right pick.

You’re contradicting yourself.

It was always the wrong pick to take the position-less player over a franchise OT. Always.
Franchise altering pick/non pick.

And the funny thing is after the pick Keim said "Well that pretty much went perfect."
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,246
Reaction score
14,310
It was always the wrong pick to take the position-less player over a franchise OT. Always.
as someone who at the time on the clock advocated for Simmons -- i would say it this way:

if you subscribe to the high value position theory: Pass Rush, OT, QB, CB

then Wirfs should have been the choice over a S/LB

but as K9 correctly points out: Keim has been chasing the next Daryl Washington for 10 years or something
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,354
Reaction score
40,500
Location
Colorado
Imagine passing on Carter for a guy that hasn’t lived anywhere close to his high school hype in Breese. Talk about worse case scenario.
Some of this will come down to length. I have heard Carter does not have long arms which can hurt DL ability to disengage from blocks. Also, he is 6'3 vs Bresse 6'5. My overall point is that if you aren't convinced Carter is 1B to Anderson's 1A status at the top of the draft, I get trading down.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,185
Reaction score
35,682
Location
BirdGangThing
I'm just not very hot on DT's that high. I think they struggle to transition and guys that looks great in college against future truckers struggle vs much stronger, faster and more experienced NFL players.

And Carter has 6 career sacks in 35 career games and 18.5 TFL's. There's a lot of "He's so strong and he gets a tonne of pressures but hasn't had the production because Georgia rotate the line so much" or "He's been playing injured". I get that.

But that asks the question "Can he handle an NFL workload?" He played 396 snaps in 2021 (40%) and 308 snaps in 2022. In the NFL he's going to need to play 800+ snaps a year. That's a massive leap.

I'm just not comfortable projecting DT's at #3 that don't have steller college production and such limited play time.

I feel there's more projection and hope there than with Anderson. So if Anderson is gone and it's Carter or trade back I think I'd take the trade back.
That's a great question...I just looked up Aaron Donald's snap counts in 2021 (when he was healthy) and he took almost 1100 snaps at 89% of plays. I don't know if that's normal for DT's, or not, but he's always been a difference maker and that's what we should be looking for at #3...a difference maker.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,354
Reaction score
40,500
Location
Colorado
I think everyone would stay for Anderson. Maybe everyone? But pretty much everyone. Carter is a more confusing one that over time we can debate more. Hopefully we get WA as I think we will have a great shot at it. I even think Chicago takes Carter over Anderson since they just moved to a 4-3 last offseason.

Also...... Simmons was the right pick over Wirfs. No after-action review will change that stance from me. It was the wrong choice now looking back....... But its not the glaring error everyone thinks it is now. Levi Brown over AP was a glaring error. Simmons over Wirfs was almost universally understood as a great move aside from a few dissenting voices.
This gets thrown around a lot and I strongly disagree that was true at the time. @DVontel highlights it well. So many people were saying that when factoring in positional value and overall grades, it was very debatable which was a better prospect.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,354
Reaction score
40,500
Location
Colorado
In the end, if you think Anderson and Carter are top of the draft talent outside of QB, you only trade down if you can ensure you are still getting one of those two players. If you believe Anderson is 1, and then Carter is in the next tier, you trade down for as much value as you can get.

All comes down to each individuals evaluation of Carter.
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,492
Reaction score
41,047
Location
UK
In the end, if you think Anderson and Carter are top of the draft talent outside of QB, you only trade down if you can ensure you are still getting one of those two players. If you believe Anderson is 1, and then Carter is in the next tier, you trade down for as much value as you can get.

All comes down to each individuals evaluation of Carter.

I know your a Bresee fan. Do you think there is that much between him and Carter?
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,354
Reaction score
40,500
Location
Colorado
I know your a Bresee fan. Do you think there is that much between him and Carter?
Honestly, I am still figuring that out.

I feel like I know Carter has a higher floor and Bresse comes with more risk. I have settled on that.

I think Bresse has shown more in his ability to generate sacks than Carter but Carter has more tackles and TFLs which hints that the gap could close.

I like Bresse's frame more than Carter's but that is just a personal preference piece.

I don't worry about Carter's ability to handle the physical aspect of the NFL and am unsure if Bresse can.

I need more info on the athletic profile of Carter before I can can one way or the other. Is he Deron Payne and/or Quinnen Williams? Is that worth passing on multiple players for? I just don't know yet. You kinda have to ask yourself what is Quinnen Williams (Payne also) value and start there if you think they are similar prospects
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,926
Reaction score
26,060
Location
Orlando, FL
Honestly, I am still figuring that out.

I feel like I know Carter has a higher floor and Bresse comes with more risk. I have settled on that.

I think Bresse has shown more in his ability to generate sacks than Carter but Carter has more tackles and TFLs which hints that the gap could close.

I like Bresse's frame more than Carter's but that is just a personal preference piece.

I don't worry about Carter's ability to handle the physical aspect of the NFL and am unsure if Bresse can.

I need more info on the athletic profile of Carter before I can can one way or the other. Is he Deron Payne and/or Quinnen Williams? Is that worth passing on multiple players for? I just don't know yet. You kinda have to ask yourself what is Quinnen Williams (Payne also) value and start there if you think they are similar prospects
Russ had a consideration on Bresee that’s worth noting. Bresee Previously had a tough ACL tear. He looks recovered but if he tears it again stats say he’s likely done. I do like him in spite of this.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,926
Reaction score
26,060
Location
Orlando, FL
The big thing about trading down is what do you need to get for sure coming out of this draft. To me that’s DL help. You can’t go far to get a sure thing. Also if you take future picks, where is that team likely to
Pick. If the Jets get Jimmy G their pick could be very low
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,409
Reaction score
16,283
Sooo…

It wasn’t the right pick.

You’re contradicting yourself.

It was always the wrong pick to take the position-less player over a franchise OT. Always.
It's not a contradiction to be honest after the fact but still understand the motive and purpose on draft night. On draft night.... the overwhelming response on this board and in the media was that we got a hell of a player at a spot no one thought he would fall to. Draft pick thread

And didn't you want Wills over Wirfs?

Regardless...... you were right. You get respect for that.


I understand.

I don’t want Simmons though.

Why? I can't find a single reason why he wouldn't be a great fit for us at 8.

1. I don’t believe in drafting a ILB in the top 8. Almost the RBs of defense. Shortest shelf life & you combine that with taking them longer to reach their peak compared to other positions on defense & just.....no thanks.

2. I don’t trust Vance Joseph on properly how to use him.

3. I believe in protecting Kyler & opening big holes for our running games offers a lot more value than a non-pass rushing LB. I’d be furious if we took Simmons over a Willis if both were still on the board.
Drafting the “rich man’s version of Deone” at #8 isn’t exactly a ringing endorsement...

We also gotta be real with ourselves guys, he’s not covering no slot WR in the NFL. Against a TE? Sure, but a slot WR? You are playing with the biggest of flames there.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,252
Reaction score
12,220
Location
York, PA
My order of preference:
1. Brown
2. Wirfs
3. Simmons
4. Lamb

Overall, I was content with Simmons. But, I had the same concerns that VJ couldn’t develop him.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,354
Reaction score
40,500
Location
Colorado
Russ had a consideration on Bresee that’s worth noting. Bresee Previously had a tough ACL tear. He looks recovered but if he tears it again stats say he’s likely done. I do like him in spite of this.
100% health and durability is part of the riskiness of him.
 

KiwiCard

Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2021
Posts
106
Reaction score
227
Location
New Zealand
If there was no trade made for the first pick, I would be inclined to try and bluff the Colts and tell them that Carolina have called offering a appealing proposal for #3 and we are thinking of taking it but not before giving them an option as we’d rather pick 4 then 9.

Now likely only one QB is gone off the board and they may be content with 2 options in which case they decline. However if they are enamoured with one they may trade up for fear of the panthers picking that player.

If they do trade we pick up some extra draft capital and still get one of Carter/Anderson.

I don’t think I would actually trade back to 9 if it was offered unless it was a ridiculous offer.
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,492
Reaction score
41,047
Location
UK
If there was no trade made for the first pick, I would be inclined to try and bluff the Colts and tell them that Carolina have called offering a appealing proposal for #3 and we are thinking of taking it but not before giving them an option as we’d rather pick 4 then 9.

Now likely only one QB is gone off the board and they may be content with 2 options in which case they decline. However if they are enamoured with one they may trade up for fear of the panthers picking that player.

If they do trade we pick up some extra draft capital and still get one of Carter/Anderson.

I don’t think I would actually trade back to 9 if it was offered unless it was a ridiculous offer.

What would be very handy is if CJ Stroud weighed in at 205+ and someone fell in love with him
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,926
Reaction score
26,060
Location
Orlando, FL
This is a tough one for me. Theres no way I trade if Carter is there. If insanity happens and the Bears take Carter, I want a huge overpay. I’d only go to 7 and require the Raiders’ 1st, 2nd & 3rd this year and next year’s 1st.
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,492
Reaction score
41,047
Location
UK
This is a tough one for me. Theres no way I trade if Carter is there. If insanity happens and the Bears take Carter, I want a huge overpay. I’d only go to 7 and require the Raiders’ 1st, 2nd & 3rd this year and next year’s 1st.

The more I look at the cap situation I'm not sure this org is in a position to turn down a bunch of extra draft picks.
 

Minski

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Posts
2,071
Reaction score
3,836
Location
Dubai, UAE
Random draft scenario...Chicago, Cardinals and Colts in a 3 way trade...

Chicago gets: 3rd (Cards), DHop, 80th (Colts), 2024 1Rnd (Colts)
Cardinals get: 4th (Colts), 35th (Colts), 2024 3rd Rnd (Colts)
Colts get: 1st (Chi)
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,926
Reaction score
26,060
Location
Orlando, FL
The more I look at the cap situation I'm not sure this org is in a position to turn down a bunch of extra draft picks.
That is a consideration. Still I’d rather do secure than rapid.
 

don7031

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 24, 2014
Posts
1,035
Reaction score
297
The best thing that can happen for the Cardinals would be for quarterbacks to be taken first and second with Levis being one of them. That adds a future first to what Cardinals can demand for the third pick.

I've flip flopped on my position. I'm now in favor of trading down multiple times. I want offensive linemen for Kyler. Take a tackle in the first and interior triangle guy in the second.
 
Top