Language
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
A language warning on McAfee is like putting "Contains nuts" on a jar of peanut butter.
Language
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
He is awesome. The ONLY thing is he has GOT to STOP wearing the tank tops. I’m sorry but tank tops on guys just look ridiculous.
Orlovsky needs to make his mind upxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I don’t understand how Dan “Safety Dance” Orlovsky has become the premier analyst for ESPN. He was a terrible QB that couldn’t read a defense or go through his progressions and we are supposed to think he is some sort of football savant? I don’t get it.Orlovsky needs to make his mind up
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Totally agree. I's been hard enough listening to Matt Hasselbeck...He was an average, at best QB, but at least he took a team to the Super Bowl so he has a little street cred. Orlovsky is an absolute joke. Also, why is Stephen A commenting on anything other than basketball? Just doesn't make sense....Just like Max Kellerman covering anything but boxing. It's okay for networks to hire analysts with a niche. IMO it makes them better, when they just cover what they know, instead of trying to be an expert in everything.I don’t understand how Dan “Safety Dance” Orlovsky has become the premier analyst for ESPN. He was a terrible QB that couldn’t read a defense or go through his progressions and we are supposed to think he is some sort of football savant? I don’t get it.
I don’t understand how Dan “Safety Dance” Orlovsky has become the premier analyst for ESPN. He was a terrible QB that couldn’t read a defense or go through his progressions and we are supposed to think he is some sort of football savant? I don’t get it.
Just because you were a terrible quarterback doesn’t mean you’re a terrible analyst and don’t know what you’re talking about there’s been plenty of terrible quarterbacks that are awesome coaches. Same principle.Totally agree. I's been hard enough listening to Matt Hasselbeck...He was an average, at best QB, but at least he took a team to the Super Bowl so he has a little street cred. Orlovsky is an absolute joke. Also, why is Stephen A commenting on anything other than basketball? Just doesn't make sense....Just like Max Kellerman covering anything but boxing. It's okay for networks to hire analysts with a niche. IMO it makes them better, when they just cover what they know, instead of trying to be an expert in everything.
Orlovsky is a complete d-bag.The moment it was said that Stafford is having a better season than Murray.
Love Smith's reaction!
You must be registered for see images attach
ESPN is a jaded, politically motivated hack show these days. Stick to the athletic and barstoolNot sure why anyone watches ESPN, if they want good analysis. Hot take central these days.
Ray Lewis knows what’s upxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Orlovsky needs to make his mind up
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
yeah, but with himself?They’re paid to disagree.
yeah, but with himself?
Do you get the nuance of your post here????A language warning on McAfee is like putting "Contains nuts" on a jar of peanut butter.
Orlovsky doesn't believe it himself. He just was forced to take the other side to have an on-air argument. This is lame.Orlovsky needs to make his mind up
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
to be fair: he says that Stafford was a teammate and he is sticking with a teammate. Motivated reasoning follows.Orlovsky doesn't believe it himself. He just was forced to take the other side to have an on-air argument. This is lame.