If you could be totally objective, which HC would you rather have, Pete Carroll or Bruce Arians?
Opposing fans hate Pete Carroll. Why?
But, if he was the coach of the Cardinals and the Cardinals were winning year after year the way Carroll's teams in Seattle are, and in light of his style of play, would you still feel contempt for the guy?
I would be fascinated to hear your honest answers.
Bruce Arians.
Better coach, hands down if you ask me.
Kickers are paid to make FG's, and our kicker should be held accountable. END OF DISCUSSION.
If Carroll wants to play the nice guy to hedge his bets, that is his situation to deal with. In a work environment, I want honesty, and straight answers, because in private business results are all that matters.
The result is we tie because Catanzaro didn't get his job done.
BTW, I wonder how it is completely lost that Arians has said MULTIPLE times since the game that he has Catanzaro's back.
So, not really sure what this article is saying past the fact Arians is transparent with the media. Carroll may be as well, but one is holding players accountable, and the other is not. At least when talking to the press.