Interesting on Rackers miss

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,129
Reaction score
39,698
Apparently Hunter Hillenmayer of the bears is saying the kick actually grazed his fingers so he may have been the reason Rackers missed?

And I also read that on the kick Rackers missed earlier, Player had the laces facing Rackers and that's why he missed.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
And I also read that on the kick Rackers missed earlier, Player had the laces facing Rackers and that's why he missed.

So much for the school of thought that holding is the sole reason for keeping Player.
 

mesacardsfan

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Posts
439
Reaction score
0
We need a punter thats what sucks! We have had very very few good punts this years its killing us!
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
Someone else mentioned on the KC field goal Player told Rackers to hurry up.

Right now if I'm Capshaw I keep my cell phone with me at all times.
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
16,094
Reaction score
8,343
:( well maybe that explains why it looked like a awful kick
 

Burg72

Registered
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Posts
278
Reaction score
1
Someone else mentioned on the KC field goal Player told Rackers to hurry up.

Right now if I'm Capshaw I keep my cell phone with me at all times.

I noticed that while at the game. Player made a gesture with his hand to hurry up. I said in my mind that I hope this doesn't throw Rackers out of sync. Well, we know how that turned out.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Did I Miss It?

Did anyone comment on the Player punt that was returned for a TD? It went straight up the field, and thus gave the returner the option of going right, left, or up the middle. Shouldn't it have been punted towards the sideline?
 

Burg72

Registered
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Posts
278
Reaction score
1
He pretty much "outkicked" the coverage because it was a line drive with no hangtime. He was going to keep great yardage with the return from the get go.
 
OP
OP
Russ Smith

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,129
Reaction score
39,698
Did anyone comment on the Player punt that was returned for a TD? It went straight up the field, and thus gave the returner the option of going right, left, or up the middle. Shouldn't it have been punted towards the sideline?


Yeah we discussed that. What really irked me was 2 punts earlier Hester was one ankle tackle away from busting one right up the middle. As soon as I knew we were punting I was worried about 2 things, Shipp missing his block again(nearly got one blocked again in this game) or a big return from Hester.

It's like we just don't pay attention to things that happen before?
 

Lloydian

Registered
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Posts
747
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Someone else mentioned on the KC field goal Player told Rackers to hurry up.

Right now if I'm Capshaw I keep my cell phone with me at all times.
Perhaps you've forgotten the circumstances. They made the catch, Leinart downed the ball, and the offense moved off the field. The special teams unit ran out but Rackers was just walking away from the drink table. By the time he got out to the field, they were under 15 seconds on the play clock. In fact, even with hurrying up, there were only a couple of seconds left on the play clock before the delay of game penalty would make the field goal even harder.

At the time, I wondered why Rackers was not more ready when the time to kick came.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
Perhaps you've forgotten the circumstances. They made the catch, Leinart downed the ball, and the offense moved off the field. The special teams unit ran out but Rackers was just walking away from the drink table. By the time he got out to the field, they were under 15 seconds on the play clock. In fact, even with hurrying up, there were only a couple of seconds left on the play clock before the delay of game penalty would make the field goal even harder.

At the time, I wondered why Rackers was not more ready when the time to kick came.

Yeah, that KC kick was just flat out wierd. He wasn't even putting on his helmet until he was out on the field and he was just trotting out there.
 

DevonCardsFan

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,819
Reaction score
802
Location
Your Mamas
Apparently Hunter Hillenmayer of the bears is saying the kick actually grazed his fingers so he may have been the reason Rackers missed?

And I also read that on the kick Rackers missed earlier, Player had the laces facing Rackers and that's why he missed.

Then let me take back my Comment that Rackers should be cut. But he still sucks in my book, not enough to be cut, but enough that I have zero confidence in him
 

AzCards21

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Posts
18,054
Reaction score
61
Location
What?
Apparently Hunter Hillenmayer of the bears is saying the kick actually grazed his fingers so he may have been the reason Rackers missed?

And I also read that on the kick Rackers missed earlier, Player had the laces facing Rackers and that's why he missed.

First of all the Bears are desperate to make this game anything but they totally sucked and we basically handed them a gift.

Second, Rackers is looking for anything to blame his crappy performance on.
 
OP
OP
Russ Smith

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,129
Reaction score
39,698
First of all the Bears are desperate to make this game anything but they totally sucked and we basically handed them a gift.

Second, Rackers is looking for anything to blame his crappy performance on.

Some guy who covers the Bears said after the game the players were saying the kick was deflected, he asked Hillenmeyer since he's the one they said got it and he said yes it grazed my fingers I don't know if that's why it missed or not. It was tumbling oddly.

The laces one I don't know where it came from, someone on a different board said they read that Player said it but I didn't see a link as to where he said it.

I was defending Player until recently but I'm ready to sign Capshaw, I just don't have faith in Scott anymore either getting the punt off, or getting the hangtime we need.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,979
Reaction score
1,059
Location
In The End Zone
Did anyone comment on the Player punt that was returned for a TD? It went straight up the field, and thus gave the returner the option of going right, left, or up the middle. Shouldn't it have been punted towards the sideline?

I did...it was a terrible line drive punt. TERRIBLE. Should have either had tons of hangtime or more importantly, been kicked out of bounds downfield....their offense did nothing so we should have had that away from Hester and as high and far out as possible.

I put that on the special teams coach...but I put the line drive punt directly on Player...if we are kicking to Hester, Player should know to hang it up in the air so our coverage can get down there and make him fair catch it, or at least catch it with players bearing down on him...not catch it and move ten yards before being near a Cardinal.
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,848
Reaction score
7,091
Location
Mesa, AZ
I did...it was a terrible line drive punt. TERRIBLE. Should have either had tons of hangtime or more importantly, been kicked out of bounds downfield....their offense did nothing so we should have had that away from Hester and as high and far out as possible.

I put that on the special teams coach...but I put the line drive punt directly on Player...if we are kicking to Hester, Player should know to hang it up in the air so our coverage can get down there and make him fair catch it, or at least catch it with players bearing down on him...not catch it and move ten yards before being near a Cardinal.

Another option.

IIRC, Player is standing on about the 15 yard. He could have turned around, took a couple quick steps and threw it out the back of the endzone for a safety and get a free kick which would have pinned the Bears down since the kick team would have been lined up in more precise, pre-determined lanes to head down field as opposed to having to come out of a punt formation to cover.

The one draw back to punting it out of bounds is what if he shanks it real bad? I know the Cards D had played well to that point but momentum had changed by then and the Bears O may have gotten really good field position and suddenly things may have started working for them at that point. Punting with more hangtime would make more sense.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,979
Reaction score
1,059
Location
In The End Zone
Another option.

IIRC, Player is standing on about the 15 yard. He could have turned around, took a couple quick steps and threw it out the back of the endzone for a safety and get a free kick which would have pinned the Bears down since the kick team would have been lined up in more precise, pre-determined lanes to head down field as opposed to having to come out of a punt formation to cover.

The one draw back to punting it out of bounds is what if he shanks it real bad? I know the Cards D had played well to that point but momentum had changed by then and the Bears O may have gotten really good field position and suddenly things may have started working for them at that point. Punting with more hangtime would make more sense.

Boy, that is a REALLY ballsy play (and one that cost San Diego a game against Baltimore earlier on). Hindsight I'd say go for it...at the game I might have swallowed my megaphone. That's a very ballsy move that I don't see this team doing, ever. But it isn't a bad option...though that kind of thing tells the offense "we aren't scared of you at all and we'll even give you two points" which could jumpstart a sucking offense, as it did the Ravens O against the Chargers as they marched up field and scored to win.
 

Burg72

Registered
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Posts
278
Reaction score
1
That is just plain out assuming Hester was gonna definately return it for a td. There was no way that anyone knew he was gonna do it. The way the Bears offense was that game, I would of had Player punt it to him over and over again. He just needed hangtime on that punt which he didn't have. That is still his fault. To say we should of gave them 2 points is just plain silly.
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,848
Reaction score
7,091
Location
Mesa, AZ
Boy, that is a REALLY ballsy play (and one that cost San Diego a game against Baltimore earlier on). Hindsight I'd say go for it...at the game I might have swallowed my megaphone. That's a very ballsy move that I don't see this team doing, ever. But it isn't a bad option...though that kind of thing tells the offense "we aren't scared of you at all and we'll even give you two points" which could jumpstart a sucking offense, as it did the Ravens O against the Chargers as they marched up field and scored to win.

I think it was obvious for the previous 56 minutes that the Cards D was saying the Bears O didn't scare them.

It would have taken huge balls to order that but I almost think it would have been the better option there but who knows. Ol'One Bar may have spun around and taken two steps and threw it 5 yards and the Bears recover or something.

Just another option. They way the Cards D was playing, I think it is a viable option because the Bears O just plain sucked...I mean everything about it sucked that night...playcalling, startegy, execution, decision-making, Gatorade cup filling everything. I see little hope the Bears could have driven the ball down the field even if they were embarassed by being handed 2 points.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
556,050
Posts
5,431,304
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top