- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 11,918
- Reaction score
- 2
Originally posted by Ed B
I want to find the 7 people who said "no" to this and give them a ******* with sandpaper.
(figuratively)
while they stare at a picture of Jake Plummer.
Originally posted by Ed B
I want to find the 7 people who said "no" to this and give them a ******* with sandpaper.
(figuratively)
Originally posted by Ed B
I want to find the 7 people who said "no" to this and give them a ******* with sandpaper.
Originally posted by RedStorm
This is like the last great act of defiance for the remaing Plummer faithful.......
Originally posted by coyotecard
I really liked the stuff he had in college but he hasnt evolved much since then. He would have been a back up at Baltimore had he signed there. Would Jake have been a backup behind Redmon with the Ravens?I dont think so.
Jeff has the arm for sure but he hasnt shown he can throw the middle routes and short stuff effectively. The only positive I can think of is that he is a lot better than Kordell. Kind of like not sweating much for a fat lady type of thing. Bottom line: he is the starter until proven otherwise. He is going to need a good center.That should be the Cards next signing-------and soon.
Originally posted by Ed B
I want to find the 7 people who said "no" to this and give them a ******* with sandpaper.
(figuratively)
Originally posted by MrY
Is Blake an upgrade over Plummer??...Does Howdy Doody have a wooden a$$???
Originally posted by azcardsfan1616
I think it is a push, so that is why i put no. I think the record will be the same as last year. The division is still very tough and even our game vs. cinn. might be a squeaker. If we were back in the east it would be a different story. I judge more on wins than stats. You could have a 2 rating but if you win 16 games all those stats go out the window. He might be an upgrade in the TD to Int ratio but i dont think there will be a change in the win loss column. That could all change though depending on the draft and the rest of Free Agency.
Originally posted by AzCards21
I was a huge Plummer fan but how in the world can't you think an upgrade in TD to INT ratio wont be better? That is exactly what wins and loses games.
Originally posted by Ed B
BW52 might be one of them to add to the list....I think I recall him supporting Jake pretty strongly.
Originally posted by azdeftone
Blake was a good sign in my opinion! Kordell would have struggled here badly at least they made the right call here.
As far as Jake vs. Blake I will withold judgement lets see how the numbers add up through some games in the up coming season. Jake may do very well in Denver and I hope he does. On the same note Hopefully we get some receivers in here and Blake lights it up. I wish them both well it was time for a change and this could be good for all concerned.
Originally posted by azdeftone
Blake was a good sign in my opinion! Kordell would have struggled here badly at least they made the right call here.
As far as Jake vs. Blake I will withold judgement lets see how the numbers add up through some games in the up coming season. Jake may do very well in Denver and I hope he does. On the same note Hopefully we get some receivers in here and Blake lights it up. I wish them both well it was time for a change and this could be good for all concerned.
<p> Good Grief Ed. I didn't notice this until after I voted and now I am extremely happy that I did vote yes. You sir--are a sadist. I sure am glad your a Cardinal fan.I want to find the 7 people who said "no" to this and give them a ******* with sandpaper.