- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 38,511
- Reaction score
- 25,472
Plus, we have brought in like nine guys to replace him.The issue is the price point for an ILB, not the player.
Plus, we have brought in like nine guys to replace him.The issue is the price point for an ILB, not the player.
My guess is they were waiting to see if any moves were made with him or budda and who they got in the draft. Not getting picked up now. Only positive I can come up with is we will get a hell of a comp pick when he blows up and gets a big deal after next year.BJ Ojulari doesn't make things easier for Simmons as BJ fits the WOLB role IMO. I can't see them picking up his option. As @AsUpRoDiGy said, 10 mil guarantee to a guy who you don't know what to do with is not a likely scenario.
Simmons is going to be just fine. The Cardinals?I was so freaking excited when he fell to us in the draft, too!
If the Cardinals don't pick up his option, I don't believe it means they will let him walk. I do feel like this team is not going to pay premium dollars for non-pass-rushing LBs so that is working against him. In the end, you have to see more of Simmons as a DC to start figuring out how best to use him in your scheme.My guess is they were waiting to see if any moves were made with him or budda and who they got in the draft. Not getting picked up now. Only positive I can come up with is we will get a hell of a comp pick when he blows up and gets a big deal after next year.
The reason we’re having this conversation is that Simmons hasn’t been the player we were hoping for at a position that is among the easiest to transition to the NFL.If the Cardinals don't pick up his option, I don't believe it means they will let him walk. I do feel like this team is not going to pay premium dollars for non-pass-rushing LBs so that is working against him. In the end, you have to see more of Simmons as a DC to start figuring out how best to use him in your scheme.
Sucks to lose a cost protected year, but the problem with taking a non-ILB in round 1 is that his 5th year contract makes him a top player at his position so your savings is more limited.
Agree.The reason we’re having this conversation is that Simmons hasn’t been the player we were hoping for at a position that is among the easiest to transition to the NFL.
It sucks, but that’s the reality.
Can’t wait to have this conversation again next year only about Zaven Collins.
And the Cardinals already have one possible in house replacement in Pappoe. I was happy the Cardinals finally dipped into the "Day Three Athletic LB" pool. I know I've seen you advocate this in the past, and I totally agree with it.If the Cardinals don't pick up his option, I don't believe it means they will let him walk. I do feel like this team is not going to pay premium dollars for non-pass-rushing LBs so that is working against him. In the end, you have to see more of Simmons as a DC to start figuring out how best to use him in your scheme.
Sucks to lose a cost protected year, but the problem with taking a non-ILB in round 1 is that his 5th year contract makes him a top player at his position so your savings is more limited.
We really don't have the DL personnel to run an effective 4-3 up front right now; we have Cam Thomas as a traditional end and nothing else. Sanders and Ojulari are more OLBers in the 3-4 alignment.Quite the log jam at LB. Kyzir White is likely to start at the WILL like he did in Philly last year. Ojulari will have to earn it, but he is likely to battle for the SAM spot ala Reddick. That creates only one open LB spot, MIKE. My current assumption is that Simmons and Collins will battle for that.
Complete flip would be the Cardinals to keep a 3-4 base. I don't know that it would change much tho.
4-3 DE is an easy vet FA fill this year so I don't believe it is a big issue.We really don't have the DL personnel to run an effective 4-3 up front right now; we have Cam Thomas as a traditional end and nothing else. Sanders and Ojulari are more OLBers in the 3-4 alignment.
Easy? 4-3 DE is never an easy fill in FA.4-3 DE is an easy vet FA fill this year so I don't believe it is a big issue.
It would be madness to prioritize finding a fit for your enigmatic pick in a contract year over instilling a long-term solution.Agree.
The only way I really see Simmons staying is if they change his position. I agree with @DVontel in that it is easier to say than do. Not too many natural fits for him with what he has shown so far.
My counter-point is that there are so few long-term solutions on this roster, I feel there are areas you could play around with.It would be madness to prioritize finding a fit for your enigmatic pick in a contract year over instilling a long-term solution.
Floyd, Ngakoue, Clark, JPP, Dunlap, Clowney, Ingram...I can keep going. All could come in and eat up 50% of DE snaps for a year.Easy? 4-3 DE is never an easy fill in FA.
Not guaranteed.Is Simmons worth $12.7 million to spend in 2024. That would be the cap hit and also the savings per spotrac.
Quite the log jam at LB. Kyzir White is likely to start at the WILL like he did in Philly last year. Ojulari will have to earn it, but he is likely to battle for the SAM spot ala Reddick. That creates only one open LB spot, MIKE. My current assumption is that Simmons and Collins will battle for that.
Complete flip would be the Cardinals to keep a 3-4 base. I don't know that it would change much tho.