Jack McCallum article - interesting read

DeAnna

Just A Face in The Crowd
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Posts
7,282
Reaction score
760
Location
Goodyear, AZ
As you may know, he wrote the book 07 Seconds or Less

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...505/index.html

Jack McCallum
Down for The Count

San Antonio began its march toward a second straight title by pushing Phoenix to the brink and likely triggering the dismantling of the once-feared Suns juggernaut

The Phoenix Suns team that had wreaked havoc on the NBA for much of the past four seasons briefly reappeared in the playoffs on Sunday afternoon. But at press time it seemed mostly a face-saving performance. Indeed, the only clear conclusion to be drawn after the Suns' 105-86 Game 4 thrashing of the San Antonio Spurs at US Airways Center was that Phoenix would not be swept. To emphasize that point, the Gorilla, the franchise's iconic mascot, stood at center court during a late timeout and broke a broomstick in half. At this juncture boasting, Dammit, we will not lose four in a row! was a little lame. But that was the fate that befell the Suns after a heartbreaking defeat in Game 1 and poorly played efforts in Games 2 and 3.

By the time you read this, the significance of their win will be known; Game 5 was scheduled for Tuesday night back in San Antonio. But whether the series ended or not, the larger story is the possible breakup of the NBA's version of the Fun Bunch and the potential departure of coach Mike D'Antoni, whose hand pushed Phoenix's throttle toward the red zone for the last four years.

D'Antoni's run-and-gun style produced the league's third-best record over that span, back-to-back MVP awards for point guard Steve Nash (2005 and '06), a Coach of the Year nod for himself ('05) and a spirited following of aficionados who appreciated the return of fast-break basketball to the league. "Mike should be given credit for re-revolutionizing offensive basketball in the NBA," says ABC/ESPN commentator and former New York Knicks and Houston Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy. "And if he never won it all, it wasn't because of his philosophy. It was because his teams weren't quite as good as those that did."

A parallel situation, meanwhile, was playing out in Dallas, where the New Orleans Hornets' 97-84 Game 4 victory on Sunday night put the Mavericks in a 3-1 hole, further proving the eternal mutability of the NBA. Dallas, like Phoenix, had a recent MVP and Coach of the Year (forward Dirk Nowitzki last season and Avery Johnson in '06), yet will probably also undergo a makeover.

It won't be easy. Neither franchise is stuck, in the Knicks sense of the word, with vastly underachieving and untradeable players collecting extravagant sums of money. But neither has a lot of wiggle room either. The Mavericks are hamstrung by big contracts given to players they may want to move, such as forward Josh Howard, who made headlines last Friday by publicly admitting his off-season affection for marijuana and who is due $20.8 million over the next two years. The Suns have a huge albatross in center Shaquille O'Neal, who is due a flat $20 million in each of the next two seasons.

But change will take place, and it will probably start, as it usually does, in the seat where X's and O's are drawn. Dallas's run was also not quite over (Game 5 in New Orleans was scheduled for Tuesday), but well-placed sources, not to mention logic and precedent, say that Johnson, the Little General, will be gone even if the Mavs pull a minor miracle and make it to the second round.

There was still a chance that D'Antoni would remain in Phoenix, a chance that no doubt would increase if the Suns were to stay alive. But the best guess is that D'Antoni, who has two years and about $10 million left on his contract, will step down, either to sit out for one season (and recharge his batteries) or to take another head job (with New York, Toronto or Chicago as possible destinations). A 232-96 record over four full seasons with the Suns? Two Western Conference finals appearances? The No. 1 offense in three of the last four years? Doesn't matter. D'Antoni hadn't been able to get by San Antonio, which through Sunday had beaten Phoenix in 11 of 15 playoff games going back to 2005.

So what happened in the Valley of the Sun? Why couldn't an enlivening coach with the perfect point guard (Nash), an athletic big man (Amaré Stoudemire) and the affection of the media and the masses keep it going? The first and most obvious answer, of course, is the Spurs, who played an exquisite series. But the Suns are a textbook example of what happens when Successful Team can't make the final jump to Championship Team. Here are some of the reasons they were unable to.

Tension at the Top

Steve Kerr was the first major hire made by Robert Sarver when Sarver became majority owner of the franchise in 2004. After serving as a consultant, Kerr took over as president of basketball operations and general manager last summer. Kerr and D'Antoni are two of the most pleasant, intelligent and nonconfrontational men in the business, but that doesn't mean they get along. In public comments each has expressed respect for the other, and they are civil enough that few in the organization noticed there was a problem. But they had an angry early-season row about D'Antoni's use of Stoudemire, whom Kerr believed would be better served with more postups on offense. "Whatever you want to criticize me for," D'Antoni told Kerr, "don't tell me how to coach offense!" D'Antoni believes that Kerr subtly knocks his coaching in the press and feels that Kerr spends too much time away from the office, at his home in San Diego. Kerr, for his part, believes that D'Antoni is stubborn about his own principles and never listens to any of Kerr's ideas. There is some truth in both of their assessments.

A schism developed between the coaching staff and the scouting staff, too, Kerr being aligned with the latter, as a G.M. often is. The more it was suggested that D'Antoni give playing time to a specific player -- rookie forward Alando Tucker, for example -- the less inclined D'Antoni was to do so, even though the coach has been faulted for having too short a rotation.

The Weight of Expectation

In 2004-05, D'Antoni's first full season at the helm, the Suns won 62 games and lost in the Western Conference finals to the Spurs. Everybody loved them. The following season, with Stoudemire injured almost the entire year, they still won 54 games and reached the conference finals, in which they lost to the Mavericks. Everybody still loved them, but fans started getting antsy. Last season Phoenix rebounded with 61 wins but was victimized in an unlucky six-game loss to San Antonio in the second round. Then the valentine read, I still kind of love you, but you'd better make me happy next year by winning it all. Everyone on the team began to feel the collective struggle of trying to reach the top, particularly those who had been around in the halcyon days when D'Antoni's uptempo style was the freshest thing to hit the NBA since dance teams. At their best the Suns were loosey-goosey, but there was little loosey or goosey about their 55-27 performance this season.

Penny Pinching

With maximum contracts given to Stoudemire and since-traded forward Shawn Marion, and a near-max to Nash, Sarver began to look for little ways to save money. Every owner has to do so, but sometimes the fate of a franchise hangs on those small decisions. Versatile guard Joe Johnson left for the Atlanta Hawks after the 2004-05 season over a few million dollars. First-round draft picks -- including Rajon Rondo, No. 22 in '06 -- were dealt away to avoid having to sign them to guaranteed deals. (Now the quarterback of the Boston Celtics, Rondo, a penetrator and willing defender, would've been the ideal backup for Nash.) Phoenix saved $8 million by trading Kurt Thomas and two No. 1 picks to the Seattle SuperSonics for a second-rounder before the season, but the veteran center resurfaced in San Antonio and had haunted the Suns in this series with his resolute interior defense.

The All-In Gambit

When Phoenix traded at midseason for O'Neal (a move supported by D'Antoni, as counterintuitive as it might have seemed), the Big Standup was supposed to leaven the tension in a locker room burdened by the title expectations. To an extent, he did. At practice on the day before Game 3, for example, O'Neal told assistant coach Alvin Gentry that he would buy him a Ferrari if Gentry, a known leaper even at age 53, could dunk in two attempts. "But no warmup," said O'Neal. Gentry failed, but the challenge gave the practice a nice feel, though that hardly helped the Suns on the court the next night.

But the arrival of Shaq also added to the pressure. For one thing it changed the go-go Suns to the stop-and-go Suns, a peculiar hybrid of a team, one that was sorta-gonna-run and was sorta-gonna-play-tough-D. (The team did neither in Games 2 and 3.) On the night O'Neal was introduced to the home crowd, he pointed to the championship ring on his finger, a sign that he intended to add another to the four he already owns. With formidable Western contenders lurking all around, like the feathered predators on telephone wires in Hitchcock's The Birds, just the sight of O'Neal reminded everyone that the Suns had to win it all this season to get their money's worth out of him. Now he represents $40 million of diminishing returns.

The Consequences of O

To his dying day, D'Antoni will tell you that a team can win a championship with an uptempo style, and he will tell you that his teams are not as bad defensively as critics claim. Perhaps he will be proved correct somewhere else. But in consistently tilting his practice time and philosophy toward offense, defensive details inevitably got overlooked -- and just as inevitably the resulting weaknesses were exploited.

D'Antoni does not demand that O'Neal come out and defend on high pick-and-rolls. Consequently, when Spurs forward Tim Duncan sets a pick for guards Tony Parker or Manu Ginóbili, then flares to the side and takes a return pass, he almost has time to count the seams on the ball before he releases a jump shot, of which he made four from 16 feet or more in Game 3. (Never mind how many uncontested looks Parker, who scored 41 points, had that night.) "That's just their philosophy," Duncan said between games in Phoenix. "If I missed those shots, it would be the right one." That's the diplomatic answer; Duncan could give you the script, blue as it might be, on what he would hear from coach Gregg Popovich if he ever stayed in the lane as O'Neal does.

Phoenix coaches will tell you that they employed a variety of defenses in Games 2 and 3 in an attempt to combat the endless pick-and-rolls, even going to a hated zone. But all of the defenses were deeply flawed, even if credit is given to the metronomelike precision of the San Antonio offense. In Game 4 D'Antoni used 6' 8" forward Boris Diaw on the 6' 2" Parker, and that slowed Parker down. But the Suns don't specialize in situational defenses and active rotations, which require discipline and hours of practice to master.

Everyone in the Phoenix organization still gets a migraine thinking about the play late in Game 1 on which Stoudemire failed to switch off and cover guard Michael Finley on a three-point shot. With a clean look Finley sent the game into overtime, and San Antonio eventually won 117-115 in two OTs, setting the course for the series. Was Stoudemire told to make the switch? Yes. Was it his fault? Yes. But the Suns don't drill and drill and drill for those situations as the Spurs do.

Karma

Perhaps if Joe Johnson hadn't suffered an eye injury during the '05 postseason, Phoenix would've gotten by San Antonio and into the Finals. Perhaps if Stoudemire and Diaw hadn't been suspended for Game 5 of last year's conference semis, in an incident precipitated by Spurs forward Robert Horry, the Suns would've won that series and gone on to the Finals. Perhaps if Finley hadn't made that Game 1 shot and Duncan hadn't made his own three (his first of the season) to send the game into a second overtime, Phoenix would've gained control of this series.

Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. So much has to go right for a team to win a championship, and in the end not enough things fell in place. Keep in mind, though, that the Suns represent a clear majority. Teams -- such as the Sacramento Kings, the Mavs and the Suns -- rise then come apart if they don't make it to the top. Even some that do, such as the Detroit Pistons (the '04 champs) and the Miami Heat (the '06 champs), can't sustain excellence. We've seen that movie so many times before. Only the saga of the Spurs, who are gunning for their second straight title and fifth in 10 seasons, continues on a seemingly endless loop, the team alternating between really good and great.

But if D'Antoni does depart, let this be the epitaph of his run-and-gun tenure: It was great fun while it lasted.
 
Last edited:

btimsah

My Name Is Robert!
Joined
May 14, 2007
Posts
1,260
Reaction score
0
Damn, what a good read. He's so informative! Loved the book too.
 

CardNots

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
4,812
Reaction score
5,120
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
Great read. We'll just reload and go through a period of being a middle of the road team. Then maybe, just maybe it will be fun again.
 

TucsonDevil

Good to be back!
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Posts
2,575
Reaction score
19
Location
SLC, UT
So, I wasn't so 'off-base' when I suggested that Tucker be given some minutes, and D'Antoni was just stubborn in not giving them...
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
DA will get the boot in the offseason
Don't be to sure. DA's style and philosophy keeps butts in the seats.....not to mention his sizable contract w/2 years remaining. It would be a shame IMO to bring in a Carlisle type next year to coach a team with very little flexability w/it's roster.
If D'Antoni stays,hire Eddie Johnson and/or another veteran assistant with a defensive mind to instill some off/def balance going forward until this team can flex some cap room muscle.
I'm still in favor of letting DA go, but if he stays, Kerr must step in and shake up the assistants.
 

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
Good read. Reflects thoughts of several on this board. This team has had so much talent last 4 years. If only we had a good coach.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Was Stoudemire told to make the switch? Yes. Was it his fault? Yes. But the Suns don't drill and drill and drill for those situations as the Spurs do.

That's why coach matters and what mindsets coaches instil matter. DA won't change. It's oxymoron to have him coach this particular roster next year.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
39,952
Reaction score
31,077
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Was Stoudemire told to make the switch? Yes. Was it his fault? Yes. But the Suns don't drill and drill and drill for those situations as the Spurs do.

That's why coach matters and what mindsets coaches instil matter. DA won't change. It's oxymoron to have him coach this particular roster next year.

Nombre Chivo!!!

Bring us the next in line.
 

hsandhu

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
2,485
Reaction score
197
Nombre Chivo!!!

Bring us the next in line.

Doesn't that one point in the article disprove your belief that coaches have little impact.

I mean say you have a parent who continually emphasizes performance in school to their child. Works extra hard with them and scolds them when they don't do well, aren't they more likely to be good students?

No guarantees, but when you have the person in charge setting the right tone and emphasizing certain points there is there not a much better chance the subordinate complies, no?
 

nashman

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
10,801
Reaction score
7,771
Location
Queen Creek, AZ
I see Amare doesn't do what he is supposed to but thats not his fault...its the coaches. Amare is a ******** he does what he wants to do which is be a lazy defender, he puts in less effort than probally anyone on the entire team on the D end. Players have to take some of the blame for not doing their JOB.
 

nowagimp

Registered User
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
3,912
Reaction score
0
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Doesn't that one point in the article disprove your belief that coaches have little impact.

I mean say you have a parent who continually emphasizes performance in school to their child. Works extra hard with them and scolds them when they don't do well, aren't they more likely to be good students?

No guarantees, but when you have the person in charge setting the right tone and emphasizing certain points there is there not a much better chance the subordinate complies, no?

Yeah nice reach about the children being analagous to NBA players. Unfortunately these "children" make millions and dont need any parent figures in their lives. Children are forming their character and habits. Supposedly character and habits are mostly solidified by 6-8 years old. I dont think you can show me a good defender that didnt work hard on defense, and suddenly got religion at 25 years old. But amare behaves like a child, no doubt. the things he says about his teammates, the dude must have an IQ of 60 not to understand the impact of his words to the media. With his work habits on defense, he should just ****. Perhaps the suns should hire a child psychologist, or perhaps he's done all the growing up he's gonna do.
 
OP
OP
DeAnna

DeAnna

Just A Face in The Crowd
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Posts
7,282
Reaction score
760
Location
Goodyear, AZ
That's why coach matters and what mindsets coaches instil matter. DA won't change. It's oxymoron to have him coach this particular roster next year.

How do you explain the good defenders on the team - like Raja? not a product of coaching, but mindset?
 

Suns_fan69

Official ASFN Lurker
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Posts
3,622
Reaction score
2,003
Location
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Raja, like Bowen, had to fight to even get into the league, and you can see that carrying over to every aspect on the court. Him and Nash are the only warriors on the team IMO.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,237
Reaction score
68,142
How do you explain the good defenders on the team - like Raja? not a product of coaching, but mindset?

i'm a little confused by you're questions. you're not attributing his defense to DA, are you? raja was regarded as a tough defender before he got here and basically was made into the defender he is today because of the defensive coaches he learned from breaking into the league... namely Larry Brown and Jerry Sloan.
 

nowagimp

Registered User
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
3,912
Reaction score
0
Location
Gilbert, AZ
i'm a little confused by you're questions. you're not attributing his defense to DA, are you? raja was regarded as a tough defender before he got here and basically was made into the defender he is today because of the defensive coaches he learned from breaking into the league... namely Larry Brown and Jerry Sloan.

Exactly, players work hard to get into the league, and what they work at will likely determine what their strengths are. Once theya re int he league and have a big guarantted contract, the motivation is much less to improve. Its no accident that many of the best defenders in the league dont have much offensive game: Raja, Battier, Chuck Hayes, Bowen, Ben Wallace, camby, Mutombo, Posey. These guys were working hard on defense to get the security of a long term NBA contract. There are rare ones like KG, artest and kobe that can do both, but those guys are rare. Coaches can have impact on guys trying to make the NBA, they are holding their careers in their hands, they need to do what the coach says or else their career is shot. A guy like amare doesnt need any coach, at 14M/yr he will play and if the coach doesnt like him he can go elsewhere, get rid of the coach, or demand to be traded.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Exactly, players work hard to get into the league, and what they work at will likely determine what their strengths are. Once theya re int he league and have a big guarantted contract, the motivation is much less to improve. Its no accident that many of the best defenders in the league dont have much offensive game: Raja, Battier, Chuck Hayes, Bowen, Ben Wallace, camby, Mutombo, Posey. These guys were working hard on defense to get the security of a long term NBA contract. There are rare ones like KG, artest and kobe that can do both, but those guys are rare. Coaches can have impact on guys trying to make the NBA, they are holding their careers in their hands, they need to do what the coach says or else their career is shot. A guy like amare doesnt need any coach, at 14M/yr he will play and if the coach doesnt like him he can go elsewhere, get rid of the coach, or demand to be traded.


Not only did they have to work hard on defense, but they needed coaches that played them for this strength of theirs.

Kurt Thomas, who just killed the Suns this year as evidenced by us having to go to Diaw for lowpost offense, wasn't given a deuce of a chance to play until the coach was forced to late in the playoffs last year.

So, the mindset coaches instill on a team matters.

Amare is childish at times and would shirk on defense seeing some others on the team were allowed to save energy for offense (Nash), too. But with a new mindset of the coach, he has no excuse anymore. And he has the ambition to become the best so that I believe he'd go along with the new coach's emphasis on defense and improve on it. He'd love a coach like Pop and Sloan.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,047
Posts
5,394,752
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top