Chopper0080
2021 - Prove It
It isn't pretty, but it doesn't have to be. Tebow is giving himself time to develop into a better passing QB by winning now.
the way he inspires his team to win at the end is hiding a whole lot of flaws.
Minus the hype........ kind of like Skelton.
I'm kinda rooting for the kid myself. Having to listen to 10 seconds of him praising his Lord and saviour is a small price to pay....hey it's entertainment...that's what I pay Directv for.
.
He's NOTHING like Skelton.
I just meant they both seem to get it done in the fourth quarter.
There's a lot of QBs that get it done in the 4th Quarter.
One thing I like about Skelton is his release is like 5000% faster than Tebow's.
i wonder how long K9's gonna stick with Sanchez is a top ten QB and Von Miller is a bust?
this Tebow thing is pretty hilarious and fun to watch.
Which of these guys would you definitely take ahead of Mark Sanchez right now?
Colt McCoy, Tim Tebow, John Beck/Rex Grossman, Matt Moore, Carson Palmer, Tavaris Jackson, John Skelton/Kevin Kolb, Sam Bradford, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Christian Ponder, Cam Newton, Blaine Gabbert, Curtis Painter, and Alex Smith.
No? Well, that's 14 of 32 QBs. Then you're looking at Andy Dalton (rook who hasn't played anyone), Josh Freeman (regressing this season for some reason), Joe Flacco, Matt Ryan (waiting for him to win his first big game), and Matt Stafford (who's coming back to the pack the last three weeks--still think he's a Top 5 QB?). Jay Cutler has definitely leap-frogged Sanchez, and Tony Romo is probably above him, too.
I think I had Sanchez at 8 in my QB power rankings. Were I to re-do them today, I'd probably go Rodgers (1), Brady (2), Roethlisberger (3), Brees (4), Rivers (5--I still believe), Jay Cutler (6), Eli Manning (7), Tony Romo (8), Matt Stafford (9), Matt Schaub (10).
If you want to quibble over whether Sanchez is the 10th vs. 12th-best QB in the NFL right now, then I'll concede the point. It's mid-November, though. There's lots of football left to play. I'll still take the guy who has won in January over a bunch of guys who haven't been there before.
With the Jets receivers, I would, without question, take Ryan, Vick, Newton and Gabbert over Sanchez. I could easily be convinced to take Palmer, Smith, Hasselbeck, Flacco and Freeman over Sanchez. Sanchez' failure to throw last night and against the Patriots have to cause a TON of concern to the Jets. The Pats were playing some serious scrubs.Which of these guys would you definitely take ahead of Mark Sanchez right now?
Colt McCoy, Tim Tebow, John Beck/Rex Grossman, Matt Moore, Carson Palmer, Tavaris Jackson, John Skelton/Kevin Kolb, Sam Bradford, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Christian Ponder, Cam Newton, Blaine Gabbert, Curtis Painter, and Alex Smith.
No? Well, that's 14 of 32 QBs. Then you're looking at Andy Dalton (rook who hasn't played anyone), Josh Freeman (regressing this season for some reason), Joe Flacco, Matt Ryan (waiting for him to win his first big game), and Matt Stafford (who's coming back to the pack the last three weeks--still think he's a Top 5 QB?). Jay Cutler has definitely leap-frogged Sanchez, and Tony Romo is probably above him, too.
I think I had Sanchez at 8 in my QB power rankings. Were I to re-do them today, I'd probably go Rodgers (1), Brady (2), Roethlisberger (3), Brees (4), Rivers (5--I still believe), Jay Cutler (6), Eli Manning (7), Tony Romo (8), Matt Stafford (9), Matt Schaub (10).
If you want to quibble over whether Sanchez is the 10th vs. 12th-best QB in the NFL right now, then I'll concede the point. It's mid-November, though. There's lots of football left to play. I'll still take the guy who has won in January over a bunch of guys who haven't been there before.
I'd love to see where I said that Von Miller was going to be a bust. I thought he was a bad fit to scheme as OLB in a 3-4 defense because he's not stout enough to stand up against the run, and not particularly interested in defending against it. He was benched from the base offense earlier this season because that was true. I haven't watched any Denver games this season, so I can't really speak to it. But I'm not sure how Von Miller's play as an SLB in a 4-3 defense has a ton of bearing on projecting Miller to WOLB in a 3-4 defense. No one disputed that he could rush the passer coming into the draft. My concern was drafting him 5th overall when he hasn't shown interest in defending the run.
Ya, the Teboners are out of hand. The Bronco D was the winner in that game.It annoys me that everyone everywhere is talking about Tebow's will to win. So the other 52 guys didn't do a damn thing? Without the pick 6 Tebow's last drive is meaningless. He does nothing for 58 minutes and then he has a decent drive and everyone goes nuts. If any other QB goes 11/28 for 173 yards in a game people would say he needs to be benched. Tebow has to take 2 games to get those kinds of stats. That tells me the Broncos are winning in spite of their QB.
With the Jets receivers, I would, without question, take Ryan, Vick, Newton and Gabbert over Sanchez. I could easily be convinced to take Palmer, Smith, Hasselbeck, Flacco and Freeman over Sanchez. Sanchez' failure to throw last night and against the Patriots have to cause a TON of concern to the Jets. The Pats were playing some serious scrubs.
Ok, maybe not Gabbert. But Ryan will at least try to throw downfield. Ryan isn't as overrated as Stafford/Bradford. And Flacco is having a rough year, but his post season record is decent. I think.Totally forgot about Vick when I was making my list. But I'm not sure right now he'd be above anyone in my Top 10, either.
"With the Jets' receivers"?! I love me some Santonio Holmes, but Plaxico Burress has nothing in the tank and can't get separation from anyone. I'd take the receiving corps in Atlanta and Philly over what they have in New Jersey.
I'd take Newton for the long term, but he's struggled this season getting Ws, and the offense that Gabbert is running makes Tim Tebow's look complicated. Matt Ryan is the most overrated quarterback in the NFL. Matty Slush.
The Denver defense is better than you think, but in personnel and performance. Unfortunately for Sanchez, the Jets' running game has not produced at it's usual level, and their defense doesn't have a matchup pass rusher. And they were playing on four days' prep flying across the country after playing on Sunday night. That was a game the Jets were going to lose.
And despite all that, are people going to be that surprised when the Jets go 5-1 the rest of the way (BUF, @WAS, KC, @PHI, NYG, @MIA) and go to the playoffs on a Wild Card?
It's crazy to me that people forget that Sanchez is 4-2 in the playoffs without ever having a home game. I get that the NFL is a week-to-week league, but to discount that kind of success to me is just mind-boggling.
Blaine Gabbert?! Seriously? ?!?!?!?!?
Ok, maybe not Gabbert. But Ryan will at least try to throw downfield. Ryan isn't as overrated as Stafford/Bradford. And Flacco is having a rough year, but his post season record is decent. I think.
I also think the Schotty Jr's offense isn't helping Sanchez. I just cannot stand watching the ground and pound. Burris is no burner but he is fine against a secondary as pourous as NE is. Sanchez has the weapons; he should feel free to stop dinking and dunking.
How long has Sanchez been on the Jets? With that same staff? How long does it take to find an offense that works for him? That is why I would be willing to go with some of the younger dudes. If you are going to have to "manage" go with potential.I'll add this in defense of Sanchez: his offensive line is dreadful. D'Brickashaw Ferguson (who many here will be calling for this offseason as a free agent replacement for Levi Brown) is awful. He's nearly as awful and Levi Brown. They have no answer at Right Tackle (Wayne Hunter? Really?!). Their only above-average OL is Nick Mangold, and he's been banged up all year. Everyone else might be well below-average.
Like Alex Smith, Carson Palmer, Joe Flacco, and many other QBs, Mark Sanchez is a guy who has to be managed. There's no question about that. I think that Kurt Schottenheimer's offense is still a work in progress for the Jets; they're continually trying things to see if they'll work and then dialing back the playbook to what Sanchez can manage and succeed with.
As Duck said in another thread, there's really nothing wrong with that. There should be more of it around the NFL.
Colt McCoy, Tim Tebow, John Beck/Rex Grossman, Matt Moore, Carson Palmer, Tavaris Jackson, John Skelton/Kevin Kolb, Sam Bradford, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Christian Ponder, Cam Newton, Blaine Gabbert, Curtis Painter, and Alex Smith.
How long has Sanchez been on the Jets? With that same staff? How long does it take to find an offense that works for him? That is why I would be willing to go with some of the younger dudes. If you are going to have to "manage" go with potential.
EDIT: you are right about that o-line. Despite Collinsworth saying D-Brick is "one of the best pass blockers in the league, he looked Levi-like against Andre Carter.
Sanchez is, without question, a problem for the offense. Throw downfield.It's his third year with the same staff. His completion percentage and rating have gone up every year. Clearly he's not good enough right now, but he was also really inexperienced coming out of college (I think only one full year as a starter). He's only 25 years old.
The Jets are 29th in the NFL right now in YPC, and among the 10 worst in rush yards per game. That and the OL are the real problems with the Jets' offense right now, not Mark Sanchez.