There are plenty of running backs whose production increased after the first few years. Here are two decent running backs that took a couple of years to get going.Yeah just like Thomas Jones. Care to
spend a few months going up and back on RB's who developed versus guys with big pr who failed. I don't think you care to do that as the results are overwhelming.
OJ Simpson
Tiki Barber
I understand that there are a higher percentage of running backs the hit the ground running but to say that a running back that doesn't show anything right away will never be any good is just false. I definately question whether JJ will be any good but considering the line that he ran behind his rookie season, and that he barely saw the field last year, I think that there may be a chance that there is something there that we haven't seen. Personally, between James, Shipp & Arrington, I think that Arrington is more of a homerun threat if the line creates a hole. JJ's rushing average his rookie year was higher than Shipp's and he had more TDs. His rushing average his rookie year was only 0.1 yds fewer than James last year. Maybe if we had fed him the ball 337 times like we did James we would have been talkin about JJ being the first 1000 yd rusher since Adrian Murrell.