John Clayton on WRs

Billy Flynt

Pirate, 300 yrs too late
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Posts
2,038
Reaction score
14
Location
port royal, jamaica
Teams need to let first-round WRs develop

By John Clayton
ESPN.com
Archive

Jimmy Smith's sudden retirement should prove simple solutions aren't easy in the NFL.

Smith was the Jaguars No. 1 receiver for a decade. When he clicked with Keenan McCardell, Jacksonville was a perennial playoff contender. But age eventually catches up to every athlete, and teams must plan accordingly. It would appear the simple solution to replacing a No. 1 receiver is to use a No. 1 draft pick on a receiver.

Not so fast. It's not that easy. The Jaguars have used three first-round picks in the past seven drafts on receivers -- R. Jay Soward (2000), Reggie Williams (2004) and Matt Jones (2005) -- and none has produced a season with more than 36 catches.

Finding a No. 1 receiver has been a No. 1 headache for many teams.

Since Mike Shanahan took over the Broncos in 1995, he has invested 16 draft choices in receivers and hasn't found one yet. Included in those choices are two first-round picks (Marcus Nash and Ashley Lelie), one second-round pick (Darius Watts) and two third-rounders (Travis McGriff and Chris Cole). The most catches a receiver drafted by Shanahan has had in a season is 54, by Lelie in 2004.

The list of first-round failures is endless. Sylvester Morris (Kansas City, 2000 draft), Freddie Mitchell (Philadelphia, 2001), David Terrell (Chicago, 2001), Soward (Jacksonville, 2000) and Rod Gardner (Washington, 2001) headline the list of recent failures. Eleven of the 16 first-round receivers taken between 2000 and 2003 haven't or won't get second contracts from the teams that drafted them. Of the other five, Reggie Wayne is the only one to have actually secured a new deal. The Lions have used three top-10 picks on wide receivers in the past four drafts and are still buried in the bottom of the passing stats.

In a passing league, why do teams drop the ball on receivers in the draft more than any other position?

The answer is simple: expectations.

If a first-round pick isn't putting up No. 1 receiving numbers three or four years into his contract, he's considered a disappointment and he won't be re-signed. Just because the first-round pick is included in his bio, does he have to put up No. 1 receiver numbers to be a good player?

One of the problems in the NFL is the turnover of coaches and how dramatically systems can change when new hires come in. Big receivers fit best in West Coast offenses. Smaller, quicker receivers who are better running after the catch fit better in the Mike Martz-Al Saunders-Norv Turner-Don Coryell system. But converting one receiver to fit into the other type of offense doesn't always work, so teams tend to move on and find alternatives.

Look at what's going on in Detroit. Roy Williams, Charles Rogers and Mike Williams have the ideal size for a West Coast offense that needs bigger bodies to go across the middle for catches. But they don't fit new coordinator Mike Martz's offense. Only Roy Williams has the skills to fit the Martz system. Expect Rogers to be gone before the start of the regular season, and Mike Williams might be on the way out next offseason.

High expectations drove Santana Moss and Plaxico Burress from the teams that drafted them. Despite being injury prone and inconsistent in the West Coast offense, Moss, who was the Jets' first-round pick in 2001, had a 1,105-yard season with the team in 2003. But that wasn't good enough so they shipped him to the Washington Redskins where he re-emerged as a Pro Bowl receiver and one of the most exciting players in the NFC. Indeed, Moss became the No. 1 receiver in a scheme for which his skills are a better fit.

The same can be said for Burress in Pittsburgh. He had a 1,008-yard season in 2001 and a 1,325-yard season in 2002. Good numbers. Still, the Steelers' No. 1 receiver was Hines Ward, a tough, physical leader who has carried the Steelers to the Super Bowl. Unless you're the St. Louis Rams, it's hard to have two No. 1 receivers, so someone has to be No. 2, and that was Burress.

Because of that, Burress wasn't offered a contract following the 2004 season and he left for New York where he helped the Giants and Eli Manning make the playoffs.

Unless teams want to waste time and money developing No. 1 receivers, they should change the standards on what they are looking for from first-round wide receivers. Steve Smith (Carolina), Chad Johnson (Cincinnati), Derrick Mason (Baltimore), Chris Chambers (Miami), Ward (Pittsburgh) and Deion Branch (New England) are among the many receivers who have developed into No. 1s even though they weren't taken in the first round.

It's possible to become a star in the NFL through hard-work, training and execution. Look at Smith, whose 5-foot-9, 185-pound body didn't fit the first-round prototype. The Panthers invested a third-round choice on him in 2001 thinking he might be a good third receiver who also could return kicks.

Smith came to the Panthers with an attitude. He believed he was a No. 1 receiver and played with a chip on his shoulder. His overconfidence often collided with management. But as Smith played and developed, he became the No. 1 receiver. Last year, he was the league's best receiver. He was right, he was a No. 1. But because expectations weren't unrealistic, Smith had time to develop into a Pro Bowl receiver.

It was interesting to hear Ward's offseason complaints about the Steelers using first-round picks to try to replace him. He fought and scrapped and battled to be the Steelers' go-to receiver. No No. 1 pick can take that reality away from him. The more Ben Roethlisberger goes to Ward, the more success the Steelers have.

What has to be remembered is that first-round picks go in the first-round for a reason. They have the height, speed and athletic skills that spew out numbers that place them among the top 32 athletes in the draft.

Say what you want about Lelie in Denver, but the guy is a talent. Even though he hasn't developed into the long-term replacement for Rod Smith and probably will be traded before too long, he has skills. He has averaged 17.9 yards per catch during his Broncos career. But the Broncos always wanted more out of him and found his replacement when they traded for Javon Walker. Lelie wants out and Mike Shanahan wants him out.

But the expectations for Lelie were too high because he was a No. 1 pick. If Darius Watts, a second-round disappointment, averaged 17.9 yards a catch and 42 catches a year as the team's No. 2, he'd be deemed a success and probably would get a second contract from the Broncos and more time to develop. Because Lelie didn't put up No. 1 numbers, he's being treated with disdain.

The No. 1 problem with drafting a receiver No. 1 is that he's not allowed to be a No. 2, unless he's Wayne with the Colts. It's no surprise that Wayne is the only first-round receiver drafted since 2000 who has secured a second contract from the team that drafted him.

NFL teams had better learn that first-round receivers don't always have to turn into No. 1 receivers.

John Clayton is a senior writer for ESPN.com.


I usually love John Clayton, but how can you write this article and never mention Fitz and Quan? And the crap about the Rams.... ugh!
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,074
Reaction score
24,092
Location
Eye in the Sky
Wow, that is crap that he didn't even mention the dynamic duo.
 

blindseyed

I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Posts
8,076
Reaction score
5,889
Location
Verrado
Billy Flynt said:
I usually love John Clayton, but how can you write this article and never mention Fitz and Quan? And the crap about the Rams.... ugh!

Has anyone sent him an e-mail pointing this out?
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
blindseyed said:
Has anyone sent him an e-mail pointing this out?

It's a story about teams with problems at the position. The Cards are not one, thank you.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,304
Reaction score
1,181
Location
SE Valley
Clayton wrote a good article. But did he deliberately omit mention of the Cardinals? No reciever better fits his basic premise than Bryant Johnson of the Cardinals.
John Clayton said:
...expectations. If a first-round pick isn't putting up No. 1 receiving numbers three or four years into his contract, he's considered a disappointment and he won't be re-signed. Just because the first-round pick is included in his bio, does he have to put up No. 1 receiver numbers to be a good player?
Johnson is a No. 1 pick and the No. 3 reciever for the Cardinals. But it happens that the Cardinals have not just one but two of the best young recievers in the NFL, Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald. So even catching 40 or more receptions each of the past two years, Johnson constantly recieves criticism from Cardinals fans, for not living up to expectations...

Yet, Johnson is a good reciever, if not a star. He contributes not only receptions but is also a fine blocker for the Cardinals. Now if the Cardinals could just get a runner past the line of scrimmage...
 

cdex99

Registered
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Posts
290
Reaction score
0
Glad to see that I wasn't the only one who thought that Q & Fitz deserved at least a mention.
 

nazaquad

Rookie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Posts
94
Reaction score
0
This Mr. Clayton appears to have support for my valid statistical that teams do not draft WR for #1 in mock draft. A sure way to get a first Super Win is to remove by trade or free agent the most recent first round WR pick as that last five winners have done so. To get high value for Larry Fitzgerald now would be a risk with reward for the big victory.
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,074
Reaction score
24,092
Location
Eye in the Sky
nazaquad said:
This Mr. Clayton appears to have support for my valid statistical that teams do not draft WR for #1 in mock draft. A sure way to get a first Super Win is to remove by trade or free agent the most recent first round WR pick as that last five winners have done so. To get high value for Larry Fitzgerald now would be a risk with reward for the big victory.
What do you think the team should get in return for Fitz?
 

nazaquad

Rookie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Posts
94
Reaction score
0
jkf296 said:
What do you think the team should get in return for Fitz?

Left tackle and/or middle linebacker
 

jefftheshark

Drive By Poster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Posts
5,067
Reaction score
520
Location
Viva Las Vegas!
nazaquad said:
This Mr. Clayton appears to have support for my valid statistical that teams do not draft WR for #1 in mock draft. A sure way to get a first Super Win is to remove by trade or free agent the most recent first round WR pick as that last five winners have done so. To get high value for Larry Fitzgerald now would be a risk with reward for the big victory.

Here we go again.

I'll put the over/under at 12 outraged replies before this thread is erased.

The Shark
 

NEZCardsfan

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Posts
9,388
Reaction score
4
nazaquad said:
Left tackle and/or middle linebacker

Insane.

Despite all the crap LD takes with Card fans....he actually performed well last year. The only rusher he had extreme problems with was D. Ware. The penalties were concerning.....but you hire a guy like Loney to fix this. And it's not like he was the only undisciplined player last year....we led the league in penalty yardage. It's his 3rd full year at LT.....working with Loney I give him a shot.....

MLB?? What MLB do you want?? We still have huge questions at DT. Who are you counting on to keep blockers off of a stud MLB?? Anyways.....Hayes was very promising before going down to injury. The way it looked like he played....he'll always probably be a little banged up....but that's why we drafted Mitchell.

No way would I reduce the explosive power of our offense to address two areas that I'm not even really sure need to be addressed right now.
 

nazaquad

Rookie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Posts
94
Reaction score
0
jefftheshark said:
Here we go again.

I'll put the over/under at 12 outraged replies before this thread is erased.

The Shark

It is not meant to outrage, as I present both sides of valid statistics - some are positive for Cardinals to win, some are not, but they are the numbers that are there. Do not think of one item being on an island.
 

nazaquad

Rookie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Posts
94
Reaction score
0
NEZCardsfan said:
Insane.

Despite all the crap LD takes with Card fans....he actually performed well last year. The only rusher he had extreme problems with was D. Ware. The penalties were concerning.....but you hire a guy like Loney to fix this. And it's not like he was the only undisciplined player last year....we led the league in penalty yardage. It's his 3rd full year at LT.....working with Loney I give him a shot.....

MLB?? What MLB do you want?? We still have huge questions at DT. Who are you counting on to keep blockers off of a stud MLB?? Anyways.....Hayes was very promising before going down to injury. The way it looked like he played....he'll always probably be a little banged up....but that's why we drafted Mitchell.

No way would I reduce the explosive power of our offense to address two areas that I'm not even really sure need to be addressed right now.

Brian Urlacher for Fitzgerald up straight would be fair to benefit both.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,304
Reaction score
1,181
Location
SE Valley
nazaquad said:
This Mr. Clayton appears to have support for my valid statistical that teams do not draft WR for #1 in mock draft. A sure way to get a first Super Win is to remove by trade or free agent the most recent first round WR pick as that last five winners have done so. To get high value for Larry Fitzgerald now would be a risk with reward for the big victory.
:lame: VERY :lame:
 

NEZCardsfan

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Posts
9,388
Reaction score
4
nazaquad said:
Brian Urlacher for Fitzgerald up straight would be fair to benefit both.

It's not even worth trying to argue this with you. You aren't here to have a football conversation. You are trolling.
 

cdex99

Registered
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Posts
290
Reaction score
0
Why trade a guy who made the Pro Bowl in just his second year and only beginning to scratch the surface of what he'll be able to do, for... ANYONE??!!

The other WR's Clayton is referring to haven't done ANYTHING in the NFL! Fitz has and will continue to do so for many years with THE CARDINALS!!!!
 

GreenCard

Registered User
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
2,365
Reaction score
0
Someone should explain to Clayton that if you want better numbers for your WRs,remove their running game.
 
OP
OP
Billy Flynt

Billy Flynt

Pirate, 300 yrs too late
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Posts
2,038
Reaction score
14
Location
port royal, jamaica
BradMannTX said:
Dude, I don't know who you are, but you're the first person I've ever put on my ignore list. There have been some doozies here, too.

Congrats.


There's an "ignore list"? Damn, no wonder no one ever answers my posts!!!! :confused:
 

BigDavis75

Making a Comeback
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
4,366
Reaction score
1,460
Location
Amherst, MA
NEZCardsfan said:
Insane.

Despite all the crap LD takes with Card fans....he actually performed well last year. The only rusher he had extreme problems with was D. Ware. The penalties were concerning.....but you hire a guy like Loney to fix this. And it's not like he was the only undisciplined player last year....we led the league in penalty yardage. It's his 3rd full year at LT.....working with Loney I give him a shot.....

MLB?? What MLB do you want?? We still have huge questions at DT. Who are you counting on to keep blockers off of a stud MLB?? Anyways.....Hayes was very promising before going down to injury. The way it looked like he played....he'll always probably be a little banged up....but that's why we drafted Mitchell.

No way would I reduce the explosive power of our offense to address two areas that I'm not even really sure need to be addressed right now.

Big dominated Ware except for one play. Ware's stats were 2 TT, 0 FF, 0 INT, 0 PD, 0 FR, and 0 sacks.

I agree though, there is no MLB that I would trade Fitz for. Lewis and Farrior are old, we don't have the DTs (development wise in Watson's case) to protect Urlacher, and so on and so forth. It was a stupid suggestion from Nazquad.
 

red desert

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
6,221
Reaction score
0
Location
A.B.Q. in da house
Speaking of wide receivers, what about B. Johnson (who else) for Denver's disgruntled A. Lelie? This is a trade that could work out for both squads. I know Lelie has underachieved in relation to where he was drafted, but so has B. Johnson.

NFL reported Denver is looking for comensurate value with Lelie's number one draft slot. B.J. would work. Both these players could benefit from the move.

I'm bored. Just something to post.
 
Top