lol
I hope that isn't the case. If they let him go because he was gay, they had to have known by last season. Weren't the pics released after the season? He still played well and didn't seem like much of a distraction except for the altercation with Dockett, and that looked like it was Dockett's fault
Knowing a guy is gay (which based on what I have read the entire organization knew and was cool - which BTW makes me very proud of the team) is different then being the team for when the first openly gay active NFL player comes out in season. So they dont care perse they just care about the eventual firestorm that comes with it - and believe me it will be HUGE. Look at Tebow as a example and why he hasnt been picked up yet. Its not that the guy cant play a role on the team, you just have to weigh that is it worth the distraction that comes with it. And NFL teams are saying quite obviously we dont want any part of that. NFL teams are control freaks like that.
If it was open that Rhodes was gay last season..... makes me think about the whole Dockett/Rhodes alleged spitting incident and how it was handled. Wasnt Dockett the ONLY guy that was against letting the Jets score? Why spit in Rhodes face then (allegedly)? Certianly spitting on someone is the biggest sign of disrespect you can do to another teammate. Is there something bigger there? And if that did happen why wasnt that a bigger deal? And we all saw how Dockett reacted with the Chris Rix Radio Interview.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Knowing a guy is gay (which based on what I have read the entire organization knew and was cool - which BTW makes me very proud of the team) is different then being the team for when the first openly gay active NFL player comes out in season. So they dont care perse they just care about the eventual firestorm that comes with it - and believe me it will be HUGE. Look at Tebow as a example and why he hasnt been picked up yet. Its not that the guy cant play a role on the team, you just have to weigh that is it worth the distraction that comes with it. And NFL teams are saying quite obviously we dont want any part of that. NFL teams are control freaks like that.
If it was open that Rhodes was gay last season..... makes me think about the whole Dockett/Rhodes alleged spitting incident and how it was handled. Wasnt Dockett the ONLY guy that was against letting the Jets score? Why spit in Rhodes face then (allegedly)? Certianly spitting on someone is the biggest sign of disrespect you can do to another teammate. Is there something bigger there? And if that did happen why wasnt that a bigger deal? And we all saw how Dockett reacted with the Chris Rix Radio Interview.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmm
I also considered your 2nd paragraph as a possibility last season. But you can't really compare Rhodes to Tebow. They both seem like good enough guys, don't really say much off the field, and should Rhodes be gay, they will both undoubtedly garner a lot of attention that neither they or their organizations asked for/want. But Rhodes is an elite caliber player at his position, Tebow isn't even starting caliber. Teams took chances on the locker-room distractions of Moss/TO/Revis/etc. because they felt their talent level was worth the risk to see what they could add. This organization, right down to individual players, knows what he adds, and aside from DD, nobody seems bothered by him in the slightestKnowing a guy is gay (which based on what I have read the entire organization knew and was cool - which BTW makes me very proud of the team) is different then being the team for when the first openly gay active NFL player comes out in season. So they dont care perse they just care about the eventual firestorm that comes with it - and believe me it will be HUGE. Look at Tebow as a example and why he hasnt been picked up yet. Its not that the guy cant play a role on the team, you just have to weigh that is it worth the distraction that comes with it. And NFL teams are saying quite obviously we dont want any part of that. NFL teams are control freaks like that.
If it was open that Rhodes was gay last season..... makes me think about the whole Dockett/Rhodes alleged spitting incident and how it was handled. Wasnt Dockett the ONLY guy that was against letting the Jets score? Why spit in Rhodes face then (allegedly)? Certianly spitting on someone is the biggest sign of disrespect you can do to another teammate. Is there something bigger there? And if that did happen why wasnt that a bigger deal? And we all saw how Dockett reacted with the Chris Rix Radio Interview.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmm
If all of this is a consideration then why, as reported, did they attempt to restructure and extend his stay in Az?
Won't let me post the link but it's on the spoctrac website.
Steal IMO.
If you take into account the Adam Snyder release the cardinals are about 13M under the cap minus Jonathan Cooper
complete supposition on your part. just because he wanted to test FA next season and not sign an extension doesn't mean he didn't want to be here.
If all of this is a consideration then why, as reported, did they attempt to restructure and extend his stay in Az?
I also considered your 2nd paragraph as a possibility last season. But you can't really compare Rhodes to Tebow. They both seem like good enough guys, don't really say much off the field, and should Rhodes be gay, they will both undoubtedly garner a lot of attention that neither they or their organizations asked for/want. But Rhodes is an elite caliber player at his position, Tebow isn't even starting caliber. Teams took chances on the locker-room distractions of Moss/TO/Revis/etc. because they felt their talent level was worth the risk to see what they could add. This organization, right down to individual players, knows what he adds, and aside from DD, nobody seems bothered by him in the slightest