classic quackery
Okay, i'm not a medical expert, but i am a scientist and i recognize bunk when i see it. And this is a perfect example:
http://www.arpprogram.com/arpprotocol/arp_science/index.html
There is not a single reference to any publication in any legitimate medical journal.
They claim that "Nobel Laureates, E. Neur and B. Sakmann, demonstrated that cells communicate with each other electrically." Actually, the man's name is "Neher" and he and Sakmann received the Nobel for developing the "patch clamp", a device for studying cell ion channels (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch-clamp_technique). The existence of electrical communication between cells was known long before. And in any case, the patch clamp has nothing to do with ARP.
Their link to "case studies" includes nothing but studies their company has performed, rather than studies by universities or independent researchers. And their description of the case studies are nothing but a few anecdotes, without any statistical analysis or even control groups.
Googling for their pseudo-medical "theories" such as "surface charge theory" yields mostly results that have nothing to do with "electrical charge buildup in collagen", and a few results that go back to the ARP website and other sellers of elictrical stimulation devices.
The only credible medical results i saw mentioned anywhere on the site are in regard to gaining muscle mass via electrical stimulation (which makes sense, since stimulating muscles essentially exercises them). But they use those results to support their vague claims of healing "a variety" of injuries.
Maybe i'm being too skeptical and perhaps there really is something to some of the types of alternative medicines (aside from psychosomatic effects), but when i read somthing like "Initial Applied Kinesiology Exam determined that the client was biomechanically out of balance, and subsequent In-Balance treatment quickly restored his balance", my BS-meter is pegged.
...dave