slinslin
Welcome to Amareca
Goran is certainly not a leader.
Len/Plumlee
Morris/???
Morris/Warren
Goodwin/Bullock
Bledsoe/Ennis
(IT, Green, Dragic x2, Tucker, Wright expendable)
if we were to go young and accept the playoff miss. Bledsoe/Goodwin/Warren is not a good combination yet, as neither is a shooter. If you got another good PF for our other trade pieces than move Bullock and Warren to the starter unit and Morri and Goodwin to the backups.
I agree with Chaplin, we really don't have any leaders. Just because Goran is a point guard, it doesn't mean he's a leader. The same is true of Bledsoe. Neither of them has the personality for it. I think the twins were the closest we came to leaders early on but we see how that's worked out.
Steve
I think some are using the words "leader", "point guard" and other labels to make their own individual points.
While it's true that the labels or their specific definitions don't matter, a team needs to have balance to be really good. Five players on the floor at a time isn't very many. If you have two or three players in the same lineup who all do basically the same things, that's a redundancy that's going to interfere with ideal productivity. It wouldn't be any better to have three centers than it would to have three point guards.
It's obvious to everyone that the Suns lack an interior presence, especially on the offensive end. Whether that problem is phrased as "too many point guards," "no true power forward," or any other label-laden language is tangential to the real issue.
Well someone is running the Suns team on the court unless Hornacek is suiting up. The problem is, I think Dragic or Bledsoe could lead the Suns more effectively if they were playing beside a traditional SG where everyone knows who is running the team on the court. Labels are for the fans to understand the game if I recall correctly. Call the point guard role what you may. I think some are using the words "leader", "point guard" and other labels to make their own individual points. The Suns are in 8th place in the Western Conference for a reason.
Every athlete cares about one last payday. If he can snow people that he's healthy using our med staff to parlay one more deal, I wouldn't be surprised.
I don't think he's getting much $$ at all, he just signed with Dallas.He's 32. NBA players tend to become more altruistic as they age because they know the money they've made will last forever. And politicians always tell the full truth.
Seriously though I could see a player like Stat giving up a little salary for a winning environment but I can't see him giving up much. Consistent minutes on a team that will let showcase him is likely to be an even bigger consideration for him, IMO.
Steve
Shams Charania @ShamsCharania
Amar'e Stoudemire has committed to sign with the Dallas Mavericks, league sources tell RealGM.
Have you decided that Wright is expendable already? I know he's 27 but he's never played heavy minutes and he seems to keep himself in good shape so he could almost certainly play for five more years and maybe considerably longer. If he has a history of injuries that would change the story. I'm not convinced yet that he's a good fit but I'd like to see more before we toss him - in the abstract I like his game and the fact that he's seemingly happy being a backup. With the rest of that group you have he'd be the back up PF primarily and play center as needed. Right now I'd keep him over the ever preening Plumlee.
Wright has not filled the role he was brought in for. Plumlee has regressed. Markieff has declared himself undersized for PF, let alone C. Marcus has disappointed. PJ is hot and cold. And they both find themselves moving up to PF when Markieff moves to C.He is an unrestricted FA and has not played better than Plumlee.
I wouldn't pay him what he will likely get on the market so it would be better to look for a contender that is willing to give up a first round pick for him.
Picking up Amare for free was the only chance this team had to stay ahead of OKC.
He is a tall, thin player who was supposed to give us strength at the "4" and "5" and has not filled that role.Wright has not played better than Plumlee? Is that a joke?
He is a tall, thin player who was supposed to give us strength at the "4" and "5" and has not filled that role.
It is not about comparing him to a disappointing Plumlee. Better or worse, it doesn't matter.
They have both been disappointing, to the point where they are both on the bench with the game on the line.
Yea agreed to some extent but I don't think its fair to say that he hasn't outplayed Plumlee. Wright can at least catch the ball. He's also somewhat useful at defending the rim.
That is why Wright replaced Len in the starting lineup..
He has been pretty good in terms of +/- in his limited minutes, but he also ranks among the worst defenders in the league so far by defensive rpm while Plumlee is among the better defenders at his position in the league.
nash, marion, amare and carter have played for both the suns and mavs.
That is why Wright replaced Len in the starting lineup..
He has been pretty good in terms of +/- in his limited minutes, but he also ranks among the worst defenders in the league so far by defensive rpm while Plumlee is among the better defenders at his position in the league.