The line is "perfectly structured," yet you'd still "consider adding a tackle" and you think we "desperately need" two guards, and you'd "consider replacing Sendlein?"
In other words, the line is perfect as long as we change 80% of it.
Sorry if it seems as if I'm singling you out, but the conformist attitude amongst the Anti-Kolb crowd is quite interesting to read and analyze. When it comes to the offense, there were tons of weaknesses across the board, with the exception of WR. But once Kolb's name emerges into the conversation, evidently he's solely responsible not only for the demise of the offense, and everyone else is absolved of all responsibility.
IMO, it's a combination of factors. Poor play calling, missed blocking assignments, no run game, no efficient pass game, etc. I don't excuse the performance by Kolb (and I've stated ad nauseum that he needs to improve on his 2.59 second release time and be less prone to injury), but he was the only semblance of a quarterback we had all season. It's no coincidence that when the protection broke down, so did the overall production of the offense. And it took two games post-Kolb for the protection to improve (7 sacks by MIN, 4 sacks by SF). Jurecki made mention of this last week that Russ Grimm finally made wholesale changes to the protection scheme and replaced Batiste with Potter and elected to give weak side help.
Skelton and Lindley are playing with house money by still being on the roster, at this current moment. Together, they set QB play back five years.
I agree with you in that it's time to move on, but it's hard to do so when Drew Stanton is the seemingly anointed savior to our QB woes. And regardless of who is playing behind center, the offensive line is still a joke.
Lather, rinse, repeat....