So you're trying to convince me that the lines of Atlanta, NYG, Green Bay, and Denver are worse than ours? I wish we could bring in the aforementioned QB as a control group to your hypothesis and see if they make plays with this line. I'd imagine their performance would decline.
Yes, Kolb has his weaknesses but to put him as the fall guy for 17 sacks in two games, numerous QB hits, and hurries, is way off base. The offensive line has been near the bottom of the ranks in pass protection for a while now and only got worse with the injuries to Bridges and Brown. And the guards are getting pushed back to the point where the pocket is as big as a phone booth. Asking any QB in the NFL to overcome this obstacle is asking far too much.
I haven't even mentioned the lack of ability to create holes for our RBs and get them to the second level.
While I understand Kolb is going to be the lightning rod for criticism for the remainder of the season, in this case it really isn't valid, IMO. It's like walking onto a farm, seeing horses, and trying to convince the farmer why he has a bunch of zebras on his farm.
If the team puts an average line in front of him (not even great or good), the offensive improves exponential, either because the QB has more time to throw or the run game is established to keep defenses guessing.