You know this because of Whitehurst's NFL completion % over his 4 years in the league??
That's just not true. I know Anderson's completion percentage has plummeted but, like Dean Wormer said to D-Day: Charlie Whitehurst...zero point zero...HAS no completion percentage.
lol..
If anything, Anderson's 50-something % is better than Whitehurst's 0%.
I was referring to college
Derek Anderson 54.2% Senior year at Oregon State
Charlie Whitehurst 67.2% Senior year at Clemson
Thats a pretty big discrepancy. Anderson has furthered his history of poor completion percentage and Whitehurst we don't know what he will do.
But if you are 67.2% accuarte in college, that usually translates to being able to fit the ball pretty well into the even smaller holes that NFL defenses allow.
I just like Charlie Whithurst as a prospect I guess, despite him not being able to get on the field with Rivers being in SD.
JMHO
I think Anderson will do well here and this is a better environment for QB's then Seattle IMO, but I liked the idea of Whitehurst as a prospect with having 4 years if preparing and practicing against NFL defesnes. It isn't full proof by any means but it the way I see it.