Lakers @ Suns 3-23-16

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
I think if you can unload Bledsoe and that contract you do it . you jump at the chance. The guy has proven he flat out can't stay healthy. Not in LA not here.



I don't mind him at all but he pretty much misses half a season every other year so far in his career


And replace him with what? You have to spend money on players, you aren't going to get better than Bledsoe for that money.
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
16,113
Reaction score
8,387
Sigh not good at all for lottery so I am suns are pretty much out of the simmons race

Oh well will probably get another type len player

Rebuild process sucks...
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,757
Reaction score
1,987
Location
On a flying cocoon
Sigh not good at all for lottery so I am suns are pretty much out of the simmons race

Oh well will probably get another type len player

Rebuild process sucks...

Yup its almost impossible for the team out of the top 3 to get the top pick. I mean the Cavs couldn't have done it exactly 2 years ago to get a player like Andrew Wiggins. Nope. Never happened.

If you really and truly believe that this a one player draft then the chances of you getting him were downright bad anyways. The team with the worst record has a 75% chance to NOT get the top player in the draft.
 

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
And replace him with what? You have to spend money on players, you aren't going to get better than Bledsoe for that money.

I like having Bledsoe as long as he's coming off the bench: 1) with fewer minutes he has less chance of injury and 2) he could go all out on defense when he is on the floor, instead conserving energy on D as he does now.

Had McD had his head screwed on right he'd have kept IT when Goran demanded a trade. Or he could have kept Tyler Ennis and the LA pick, passing on Knight. I thought Ennis was good at running the offense but maybe he wouldn't have worked out - we really didn't get to see much of him. Even if not we'd still be ahead of the game without having BK.

At the current juncture we could probably get Ennis for little, heck Phil Pressey was worth a longer look I thought. I think the problem is that McD is still set on the course of Bled and Knight being our starting backcourt - you'd think Booker would have changed his mind about that but he's really not acting like it.
 

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
2,451
Reaction score
1,120
Location
Norway
Woff

Price, #23 and Budinger before Goodwin. Can't understand why we extended him. Hopefully useful as a trading chip.
 

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
2,451
Reaction score
1,120
Location
Norway
And replace him with what? You have to spend money on players, you aren't going to get better than Bledsoe for that money.

Do you think we can contend for a title with an injury prone sub par point guard, or is it enough that the contracts are good value for money and the team makes the playoffs when he's healthy? I'm exaggerating. Off course we all want to win. If we can get a difference maker then I hope they sacrifice Bledsoe. If not then give him a season and see how he works with Len and Booker. I don't believe he's a long term answer as point guard but Rome wasn't built in a day.

Pop and good coaches know when to rest players. Take it as a meaningless preseason game to try out players and sets. And get the ping pongs, I mean come on.
 
Last edited:

JS22

Say Vandelay!
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
5,791
Reaction score
211
I like having Bledsoe as long as he's coming off the bench: 1) with fewer minutes he has less chance of injury and 2) he could go all out on defense when he is on the floor, instead conserving energy on D as he does now.

Had McD had his head screwed on right he'd have kept IT when Goran demanded a trade. Or he could have kept Tyler Ennis and the LA pick, passing on Knight. I thought Ennis was good at running the offense but maybe he wouldn't have worked out - we really didn't get to see much of him. Even if not we'd still be ahead of the game without having BK.

At the current juncture we could probably get Ennis for little, heck Phil Pressey was worth a longer look I thought. I think the problem is that McD is still set on the course of Bled and Knight being our starting backcourt - you'd think Booker would have changed his mind about that but he's really not acting like it.

I'm not sure about that. He seemed pretty hesitant to stand by the 2PG system on Burns and Gambo yesterday. I kind of get the sense that that was a Hornacek thing.

Knight really isn't a PG anyway. More of an undersized 2 which is a different problem altogether. I do remember him being really, REALLY good when Bledsoe was more in control of the offense early on in the season.

I think he'll stick around for most of next season and cut into Booker's minutes a little. That sucks, but hopefully he can play like he did the first month of the season and bump up his trade value. But if I'm McD and I get a decent offer for Knight in the offseason I swallow my pride and take it. Otherwise you are just stunting Booker who is most likely the better choice long term.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,464
Reaction score
16,991
Location
Round Rock, TX
Yesss Suns pick up another win!!

I'm honestly wondering if Ryan McDonough is trying to do favors for Danny Ainge (who gets the Nets pick which is now top 3).

McD always gets ripped off by Ainge hence the IT deal and the Wright deal (gave up two high 2nd rd picks for 2 month rental of a scrub big man Wright).

I wonder if McD is pressuring Watson to make sure we still win as many as we can for remainder of the season so that the Nets pick improves for his old boss Ainge.

It can be like a "thank you" type thing for Ainge who obviously hired McD the first time and gave him his opportunity as assistant GM in Boston which led to him getting the GM job here.

This could 99% be my frustration with this dumb idiotic team that's talking but yea.

There's no team I hate more than the Lakers but it honestly could be because I envy and respect them so much as well. They know how to win and bring championships home and when they suck, they know how to lose and bring tier 1 prospects home.

Settle down. It's one thing to whine that we're not deliberately losing games, yet another to say we are actively trying to help another team get a higher pick. Ludicrous, and you should be ashamed for thinking so.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
So Al McCoy in radio interview just a few minutes ago said he respected Kobe as a competitor and a player but did not like him as a person.

I understand it and even agree with it but it seems an odd thing for a teams play by play guy to say on air. Am I just getting too politically correct?
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,207
Reaction score
70,486
So Al McCoy in radio interview just a few minutes ago said he respected Kobe as a competitor and a player but did not like him as a person.

I understand it and even agree with it but it seems an odd thing for a teams play by play guy to say on air. Am I just getting too politically correct?

ha! damn... that is an odd thing to say, but I love McCoy for saying it.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
So Al McCoy in radio interview just a few minutes ago said he respected Kobe as a competitor and a player but did not like him as a person.

I understand it and even agree with it but it seems an odd thing for a teams play by play guy to say on air. Am I just getting too politically correct?

No Al McCoy isn't Skip Bayless or Stephen A Smith just pouting nonsense for clicks. I think he's earned the right to say it.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
Sigh not good at all for lottery so I am suns are pretty much out of the simmons race

Oh well will probably get another type len player

Rebuild process sucks...

The cycle never ends. The Lakers are probably gonna win a championship before the Suns even win one playoff series again.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,072
Reaction score
13,842
So Al McCoy in radio interview just a few minutes ago said he respected Kobe as a competitor and a player but did not like him as a person.

I understand it and even agree with it but it seems an odd thing for a teams play by play guy to say on air. Am I just getting too politically correct?

Al McCoy can say whatever he wants regarding basketball lol

Him and Cotton are the voices of my childhood
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,364
Reaction score
59,971
Tom Chambers speaks his mind as well. He has some moments where he speaks candidly.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
The unsung story of this game is that Kobe treated Book like a rising superstar.

Has he been doing that in other cities with other young players? It looks to me like the players in this league are recognizing something special in Book.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
I think the problem is that McD is still set on the course of Bled and Knight being our starting backcourt - you'd think Booker would have changed his mind about that but he's really not acting like it.
That is a strong possibility, but I would expect that even the Suns Front Office would know better than to put Booker back into the second unit, considering they have already make him the face of the franchise in their advertising to sell tickets.

If McDonough is still set on a starting backcourt of Bledsoe and Knight (until one them, or both of them, get injured) he could always move Booker to starting Small Forward.

I am not advocating that, but that would be the way for the GM to continue his obsession and time will prove if it still is.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,364
Reaction score
59,971
That is a strong possibility, but I would expect that even the Suns Front Office would know better than to put Booker back into the second unit, considering they have already make him the face of the franchise in their advertising to sell tickets.

If McDonough is still set on a starting backcourt of Bledsoe and Knight (until one them, or both of them, get injured) he could always move Booker to starting Small Forward.

I am not advocating that, but that would be the way for the GM to continue his obsession and time will prove if it still is.

That would be some exciting small ball but the Suns would have to be solid at center and PF. It could be an occasional lineup the Suns use to spark the offense.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
That is a strong possibility, but I would expect that even the Suns Front Office would know better than to put Booker back into the second unit, considering they have already make him the face of the franchise in their advertising to sell tickets.

If McDonough is still set on a starting backcourt of Bledsoe and Knight (until one them, or both of them, get injured) he could always move Booker to starting Small Forward.

I am not advocating that, but that would be the way for the GM to continue his obsession and time will prove if it still is.

I am shocked that you would make this suggestion. Booker is too small to be an effective SF, especially on defense. The chances of him being an effective starting pg are much greater than him being an effective SF.

The solution is for Knight to be traded or come off the bench. I think everyone knows that including Knight. The only chance that changes is if the Suns hire a new, old school (experienced) head coach that doesn't like young players.

I think its probably important to keep Watson for the next two years at least. There are too many young players to develop and he seems to be good at it. He might not be a championship caliber coach, but he is the right coach for this stage.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
I am shocked that you would make this suggestion. Booker is too small to be an effective SF, especially on defense. The chances of him being an effective starting pg are much greater than him being an effective SF.

The solution is for Knight to be traded or come off the bench. I think everyone knows that including Knight. The only chance that changes is if the Suns hire a new, old school (experienced) head coach that doesn't like young players.

I think its probably important to keep Watson for the next two years at least. There are too many young players to develop and he seems to be good at it. He might not be a championship caliber coach, but he is the right coach for this stage.

I don't think BC is suggesting turning Booker into a small forward, but simply pointing out he wouldn;t be surprised if McD directed Watson to do so.

I completely agree with everything you said in this post. I think Booker can play SF for a few minutes if the Suns need to go small, but I don't see him consistently playing that position. Keep in mind, we will likely have Warren starting at 3 next year. Knight has to go or accept the role of the first guard off the bench. Watson needs to stick around, for the reasons you stated. I am not sold on his being a great coach, but I am sold on him being a great coach for this particular team at this stage.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
I don't think BC is suggesting turning Booker into a small forward, but simply pointing out he wouldn;t be surprised if McD directed Watson to do so.

I completely agree with everything you said in this post. I think Booker can play SF for a few minutes if the Suns need to go small, but I don't see him consistently playing that position. Keep in mind, we will likely have Warren starting at 3 next year. Knight has to go or accept the role of the first guard off the bench. Watson needs to stick around, for the reasons you stated. I am not sold on his being a great coach, but I am sold on him being a great coach for this particular team at this stage.

No, I didn't think he was suggesting sf full-time, its just to BC any idea of going small has always been completely unacceptible.
 
Top