Latest on possible Ariza trade

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,517
Reaction score
12,721
Location
Tempe, AZ
This thread turned into comedy gold.

I like Oubre AND Rivers this gives us some depth at least. Ariza can go to washington which is already a disaster

I wonder how hard Ariza will play in Washington. If he gives more effort there then he did here that will be disappointing but I guess we can see what sort of difference playing with a real PG makes. I'm glad we did a deal with Washington that didn't involve Wall. I thought they had someone who was buddies with McD since we've done a couple deals with them over the years but apparently it's just 2 incompetent owners bonding.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,019
Reaction score
58,878
Location
SoCal
I wonder how hard Ariza will play in Washington. If he gives more effort there then he did here that will be disappointing but I guess we can see what sort of difference playing with a real PG makes. I'm glad we did a deal with Washington that didn't involve Wall. I thought they had someone who was buddies with McD since we've done a couple deals with them over the years but apparently it's just 2 incompetent owners bonding.
Admittedly I haven’t had the opp to watch every suns game this season but I’ve watched enough of them to question the whole “ariza isn’t trying” argument. In every game I’ve watched (maybe 10-15) I’ve seen him give effort. Is he as athletic as he was at his peak (which wasn’t uber-athletic)? No. And that cost him at times. But I never really saw cause to question his effort. Maybe it was the other 15 or so games.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,517
Reaction score
12,721
Location
Tempe, AZ
Admittedly I haven’t had the opp to watch every suns game this season but I’ve watched enough of them to question the whole “ariza isn’t trying” argument. In every game I’ve watched (maybe 10-15) I’ve seen him give effort. Is he as athletic as he was at his peak (which wasn’t uber-athletic)? No. And that cost him at times. But I never really saw cause to question his effort. Maybe it was the other 15 or so games.

Ariza played harder when he returned from whatever "personal issue" he had was. Prior to that I saw him walk up and down the court, allow easy layups, and generally play like other Suns. Maybe I expected more from him, he was supposed to be a veteran leader, but he seemed distracted and disinterested early in the season. I've only seen like 3 games since he returned from that 1 or 2 game absence but he looked more engaged then.
 

95pro

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
12,739
Reaction score
4,200
I think the offensive scheme was a problem for Arizas skill set. He found himself having to dribble the ball and try to create sometimes. He never had to do that while Houston.
 

Suns_fan69

Official ASFN Lurker
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Posts
3,666
Reaction score
2,065
Location
Vancouver, BC, Canada
I think the offensive scheme was a problem for Arizas skill set. He found himself having to dribble the ball and try to create sometimes. He never had to do that while Houston.
Yup, in Houston he just camped out on the short corner 3s where he was shooting a really high percentage. Wasn't too many of those for him in Igor's scheme.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,913
Reaction score
7,520
Current roster and my guess at starting lineup.

Rivers
Booker
Bridges
Warren
Ayton

Reserves
Guards: Crawford, Melton, Daniels, Okobo
Wings: Oubre, Jackson,
Bigs: Holmes, Anderson, Bender, Moreland
2 way: King and Evans

Hopefully Igor keeps Bridges in the starting line-up. Adding Rivers would give some additional scoring punch and 4 of 5 starters legit 3 point threats.

Crawford spells Booker and gives our second unit stability. Melton for Rivers to provide some defensive intensity.

Our main wing rotation will be Bridges, Warren, Oubre, and Jackson

Ayton and Holmes round out our bigs

That's a 10 man rotation. Daniels deserves some burn and maybe Okobo now and then.
 
Last edited:

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
Current roster and my guess at starting lineup.

Rivers
Booker
Bridges
Warren
Ayton

Reserves
Guards: Crawford, Melton, Daniels, Okobo
Wings: Oubre, Jackson,
Bigs: Holmes, Anderson, Bender, Moreland
2 way: King and Evans

Hopefully Igor keeps Bridges in the starting line-up. Adding Rivers would give some additional scoring punch and 4 of 5 starters legit 3 point threats.

Crawford spells Booker and gives our second unit stability. Melton for Rivers to provide some defensive intensity.

Our main wing rotation will be Bridges, Warren, Oubre, and Jackson

Ayton and Holmes round out our bigs

That's an 8 man rotation. Daniels deserves some burn and maybe Okobo now and then.
This is almost exactly how I see it.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,065
Reaction score
13,837
Daniels def deserves some time he played great while Booker was out he can't play defense at all but when he gets hot he can fill it up
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,105
Reaction score
59,722
Of course it is too early to know how Oubre works out.

However, if he plays well, this could be like one of the Suns moves in free agency if he can be resigned for a reasonable contract.

The Suns further could concentrate on adding a couple more big men while keeping Holmes with the addition of a point guard. I'm having good feelings about Melton going forward but he is not there yet.
 

Rab

Angry Vedder
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Posts
1,539
Reaction score
225
Location
In My Tree
Daniels def deserves some time he played great while Booker was out he can't play defense at all but when he gets hot he can fill it up
I liked having Daniels out there as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

95pro

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
12,739
Reaction score
4,200
So on NBA radio, I forget which show, but they said that Sarver had refused to work any trades with the Lakers because they are the Lakers. They went on to criticize Sarver saying that you get the best trade possible despite the team and who you're dealing with.

Do you guys think, if true, Sarver either blocked us from a good/bad trade? Maybe James Jones wanted to give the lakers a gift?
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
So on NBA radio, I forget which show, but they said that Sarver had refused to work any trades with the Lakers because they are the Lakers. They went on to criticize Sarver saying that you get the best trade possible despite the team and who you're dealing with.

Do you guys think, if true, Sarver either blocked us from a good/bad trade? Maybe James Jones wanted to give the lakers a gift?

The issue here is I don't see a path where a Lakers trade would have worked out. Reports say we wanted one of their young pieces. That's Ball, Kuzma, Ingram, or Hart. There is no way the Lakers do that. So if those players are off the table, what could the Lakers even have given us? Nothing as good as Oubre. There wasn't really a fit there.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,913
Reaction score
7,520
So on NBA radio, I forget which show, but they said that Sarver had refused to work any trades with the Lakers because they are the Lakers. They went on to criticize Sarver saying that you get the best trade possible despite the team and who you're dealing with.

Do you guys think, if true, Sarver either blocked us from a good/bad trade? Maybe James Jones wanted to give the lakers a gift?

Funny! Did they criticize Popovich for the reports he refused to send Kahwi to the Lakers?

The reported offer for Ariza was KCP and and their late 2nd rounder. If that was the offer then Sarver made the right decision.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Fork ESPN and all the NBA media. They all want the Suns to be a farm team for the Lebron show.

I’m OK with Sarver not trading Ariza to the Lakers. If you can show me evidence that he passed on one of their young guns I would change my opinion. But that’s not what anybody is saying.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,186
Reaction score
6,661
Fork ESPN and all the NBA media. They all want the Suns to be a farm team for the Lebron show.

I’m OK with Sarver not trading Ariza to the Lakers. If you can show me evidence that he passed on one of their young guns I would change my opinion. But that’s not what anybody is saying.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually there are reports that we were trying to trade for Hart, but the Lakers wouldn't do it. We just weren't going to get as much as some people wanted in an Ariza trade. We ended up with a solid deal considering.
 

95pro

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
12,739
Reaction score
4,200
Yeah the radio show surprised me as that was the first I've heard of Sarver not wanting to deal with the Lakers just because they're the Lakers.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,451
Reaction score
16,985
Location
Round Rock, TX
Yeah the radio show surprised me as that was the first I've heard of Sarver not wanting to deal with the Lakers just because they're the Lakers.
Not true.

The Lakers ONLY offered KCP and a 2nd for Ariza. This isn't rocket science. If I was the owner, I would have said HELL NO to that as well. But the media and armchair GMs on message boards like to spin everything to fall back on their current punching bag--who is Sarver. I hate the guy as well, but only for realistic and TRUE reasons.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
Not true.

The Lakers ONLY offered KCP and a 2nd for Ariza. This isn't rocket science. If I was the owner, I would have said HELL NO to that as well. But the media and armchair GMs on message boards like to spin everything to fall back on their current punching bag--who is Sarver. I hate the guy as well, but only for realistic and TRUE reasons.
I agree with this. Sarver putting his foot down on a Laker trade was probably a good thing.

I would rather have Oubre than KCP and a second round pick.
 

95pro

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
12,739
Reaction score
4,200
Not true.

The Lakers ONLY offered KCP and a 2nd for Ariza. This isn't rocket science. If I was the owner, I would have said HELL NO to that as well. But the media and armchair GMs on message boards like to spin everything to fall back on their current punching bag--who is Sarver. I hate the guy as well, but only for realistic and TRUE reasons.

Right. That's what I getting at, that the nba radio made it seem like sarver said no to a better deal. But we all know they have nothing to offer us, outside of Kuz Ingram Ball, that we'd like.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,841
Reaction score
16,629
Right. That's what I getting at, that the nba radio made it seem like sarver said no to a better deal. But we all know they have nothing to offer us, outside of Kuz Ingram Ball, that we'd like.

We're and easy media target thanks to Sarver but those might be rumors spread by a few bitter Lakers fans that were convinced they were going to get Ariza cheap. I know I've heard it more than a few times that if we wouldn't make the deal for KCP they'd just wait until we came to our senses and bought out Ariza's contract later this season.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Have you noticed that the last five posts were about Sarver?

Has the position of General Manager been eliminated in the NBA?

Seriously, what are the investor's credentials to play that role?

And what position does it put our (temporary acting half) 'General Manager' in when trying to negotiate with other teams' GM's?

Is there a corporation in America where the Board of Directors/investors usurp the authority of the CEO, COO, CFO, HR Director, etc.?
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
Have you noticed that the last five posts were about Sarver?

Has the position of General Manager been eliminated in the NBA?

Seriously, what are the investor's credentials to play that role?

And what position does it put our (temporary acting half) 'General Manager' in when trying to negotiate with other teams' GM's?

Is there a corporation in America where the Board of Directors/investors usurp the authority of the CEO, COO, CFO, HR Director, etc.?

Technically it can happen with any corporation, and with any partnership or LLC unless there is a partnership agreement or operating agreement that insulates the general partner or manager or officers from removal. The problem is that the Board of Directors or shareholders/limited partners/members need to be willing to take that action, and the minority partners of the Suns ownership entity are not willing to do so.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,841
Reaction score
16,629
Have you noticed that the last five posts were about Sarver?

Has the position of General Manager been eliminated in the NBA?

Seriously, what are the investor's credentials to play that role?

And what position does it put our (temporary acting half) 'General Manager' in when trying to negotiate with other teams' GM's?

Is there a corporation in America where the Board of Directors/investors usurp the authority of the CEO, COO, CFO, HR Director, etc.?

Wow, you're really doing some leap-frogging there. I don't see any issue with Sarver telling Jones to look elsewhere and that's all we're talking about. We're not talking about Sarver doing 5 different things, 5 of us are talking about the same thing he did.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,105
Reaction score
59,722
Actually there are reports that we were trying to trade for Hart, but the Lakers wouldn't do it. We just weren't going to get as much as some people wanted in an Ariza trade. We ended up with a solid deal considering.

Josh Hart would have been a steal. This was not going to happen.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
555,775
Posts
5,429,357
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top