Lawmaker (idiot) challenges funding for stadium

wilycoyote24

All Star
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Posts
707
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin
I hope the Governor's designation of everyday that the Suns are in the playoffs as "Sunsday" means that she is a fan of sports and not just the Suns or not just doing it because someone told her that it would be the politically smart thing to do.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
She'll veto it. Remember, this is the same lady that made the "task force" to resolve the issue. I'm not a huge fan of the gov, but to her credit, she doesn't usually put up with these shenanigans.
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
NickelBack said:
Then you'd better hope the Gove vetos it, because it's been approved by both houses.
No state governor is going to leave an unfinished, $300 million white elephant sitting out in Glendale as Arizona waves goodbye to the Super Bowl and the BCS title game.

Not gonna happen.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,913
Reaction score
840
Location
In The End Zone
wilycoyote24 said:
I hope the Governor's designation of everyday that the Suns are in the playoffs as "Sunsday" means that she is a fan of sports and not just the Suns or not just doing it because someone told her that it would be the politically smart thing to do.


100% PR move.
 
OP
OP
Stronso

Stronso

Schweddy Balls
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
2,738
Reaction score
5
Location
TUCSON
NickelBack said:
Then you'd better hope the Gove vetos it, because it' been approved by both houses.

The same both houses which passed ******** legislation to allow people to bring guns into bars?
 

RedViper

Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Posts
1,742
Reaction score
19
Location
Flagstaff
I don't know why anyone would doubt this thing could still be derailed by idiots. Pierce would love nothing more to see the stadium turn into a train wreck, just so he could blame it on Janet. He'd also do it in a heartbeat just so Janet wouldn't get any credit for it. Just because common sense tells you we wouldn't allow the stadium to sit unfinished out in that field, or allow three football championship games go begging for somewhere else to play-common sense isn't what dictates here. Common sense is no protection for us at all in this thing.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
Viper, she can line item veto it. Pierce has a limited say, from what I hear. Plus...lawsuits would be flying around so fast against the state it would be sick. Won't happen...I think. Maybe you can give a perspective on that since you are a lawyer. Couldn't that be construed as breach of contract?
 

NickelBack

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
3,640
Reaction score
1
Stronso said:
The same both houses which passed ******** legislation to allow people to bring guns into bars?

One in the same and, if the Governor does not veto it, it becomes law.
 

wilycoyote24

All Star
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Posts
707
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin
D-Dogg said:
100% PR move.

Clearly a PR move. However, so would vetoing this. She showed that she is specifically concerned with sports fans' opinions of her, as many people may think "Why is she concerned with such trivial things?," so perhaps she will act as such once again. This could be the difference between having the Super Bowl and BCS Championship Game and not having them. I think that that would be more of a concern to most fans than a meaningly political move.
 
OP
OP
Stronso

Stronso

Schweddy Balls
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
2,738
Reaction score
5
Location
TUCSON
WizardOfAz said:
Just called her (well not her directly) that I expected her to use the line-item veto on this one!

I wrote a e-mail stating the same thing
 

RedViper

Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Posts
1,742
Reaction score
19
Location
Flagstaff
azsouthendzone said:
Viper, she can line item veto it. Pierce has a limited say, from what I hear. Plus...lawsuits would be flying around so fast against the state it would be sick. Won't happen...I think. Maybe you can give a perspective on that since you are a lawyer. Couldn't that be construed as breach of contract?

I'm in criminal law and don't hassle around much with contracts or civil law or have any expertise here. Nevertheless, I predict if the funding for this dries up, stadium doesn't open by 2006 because of it, etc, I would expect it to be like an armaggeddon of litigation that would make the flight path thing look a small claims court case.

I'm hoping the gov just uses that veto and this won't turn into anything. The path to getting this stadium into reality has had so much drama, turns, twists, villains, even with it rising up in that field as we speak, I still don't feel safe.
 
Last edited:

NickelBack

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
3,640
Reaction score
1
Good stuff! Keep peppering her so she knows we are out here.

I haven't seen anything more on this in the paper since the story that was added to this thread.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
551,204
Posts
5,385,010
Members
6,309
Latest member
Broncosfan
Top