nowagimp
Registered User
Here is an interesting article on the Donaghy case. it appears that Donaghys federal testimony was impounded, not accessible to the public. The public letter that Donaghys lawyer sent is the only source of his testimony available to the public. the letter only came out in response to the NBA's insistence on 1 million in restitution for the damages of the scandal(highly unusual in a case where money wasnt stolen). Before the NBAs insistence on restitution, Donaghy was probably going to see a reduced sentence of a few years, but his inability to pay restitution would keep him in prison and prevent that. The response of Donaghys lawyer was to send this public letter -a means to hit the NBA back for trying to prevent his reduced sentence- by releasing information to the public that was previously not available.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?id=3436503
the interesting thing is that now it is uncertain whether the NBA broke any laws if they rigged games, but the public letter opens up the "pandoras box" of possible investigations in cities where the allegations took place.
I guess the NBA's lawyers werent as smart as they thought they were as none of this happens if they dont try to screw Donaghy. Surely the damage of this public letter far exceeds 1M, and getting to screw Donaghy may come at a pretty high price.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?id=3436503
the interesting thing is that now it is uncertain whether the NBA broke any laws if they rigged games, but the public letter opens up the "pandoras box" of possible investigations in cities where the allegations took place.
I guess the NBA's lawyers werent as smart as they thought they were as none of this happens if they dont try to screw Donaghy. Surely the damage of this public letter far exceeds 1M, and getting to screw Donaghy may come at a pretty high price.
Last edited: