Leonard Little acquitted......

DieHardFromMO

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 6, 2003
Posts
1,104
Reaction score
3
Location
Columbia, MO
Leonard Little is acquitted of DUI
B Y WILLIAM C. LHOTKA
Of the Post-Dispatch
04/01/2005


A jury in St. Louis County Circuit Court acquitted Rams defensive end Leonard Little on Friday of drunk driving Highway 40 last year in Ladue.

Little cried as the verdict was read in St. Louis County Circuit Court. He hugged his attorney, Scott Rosenblum, before collapsing to the floor.

Rosenblum helped him up joking, "You're too big to pick up," as Little got back to his feet.

Little was convicted on the lesser charge of speeding. Had he been convicted of the felony charge of driving while intoxicated, he would have faced up to four years in prison.

Little's 2003 Mercedes was stopped at 3:44 a.m. on April 24 on Highway 40 near Lindbergh Boulevard. Officer Gregory Stork said he clocked Little at 78 mph. Little flunked three field sobriety tests, Stork claimed.

Stork was the main prosecution witness against Little - and Rosenblum put the officer on trial during three hours of cross-examination on Thursday and in closing arguments on Friday.

Prosecutor Mark Bishop told the jury of 11 women and one man that Little put on "the two beers defense. He drank so many beers that night, he doesn't remember how many."

Whenever a police officer stops someone who is drunk and asks that person how much they had been drinking, they usually get the answer: "two beers," Bishop said.

In an audiotape, Little first tells Stork he had two beers, and later he says he doesn't remember. Little refused a breathalyzer test at the Ladue Police Station that would have shown his blood alcohol content.

In alleging Little was drunk and noting that a refusal to take the test means an automatic revocation, Bishop said: "He would rather give up his drivers license for a full calendar year than take the test."

Rosenblum portrayed Stork as a "sheep in wolf's clothing," who appeared to be a nice guy but had an agenda of making as many DWI arrests as he could.

In his testimony Thursday, Stork admitted that the sobriety tests he administered to Little varied from established police procedures. Using Stork's testimony in a license revocation hearing 19 days before Little's arrest, Rosenblum impeached Stork's trial testimony at least four times.

On Friday, the only defense witness that Rosenblum called was Ladue Officer Keneth Andreski who was Stork's backup when Little was arrested and was standing five feet from the defendant when Little was given the sobriety tests.

Stork had testified that Little was windmilling his arms and unable to stand on one foot. Andreski said he didn't recall seeing Little swinging his arms or holding them outward like airplane wings to keep his balance.

Andreski said he didn't recall seeing Little swaying or using the Mercedes for support, as Stork had told the jury.

Also testifying Friday was Sgt. Darin McClure. Under questioning by Bishop, McClure said he administered a breath test at the arrest scene on a portable machine and it showed Little had been drinking. McClure said also he smelled alcohol on Little's breath.

Under Rosenblum's questioning, McClure said Little wasn't stumbling, swaying, losing his balance or smelling of alcohol at the Ladue police station where he was taken 18 minutes after the traffic stop.

"The only crime you saw in this courtroom was what Greg Stork did out there that night," Rosenblum told the jury.

Referring to McClure's testimony, Rosenblum said Little must have "magically sobered up" between his arrest on Highway 40 and his arrival at the police station. "Nothing in this case is consistent with intoxication."

Bishop said Stork had no motive to pick on Little. The police officer has arrested between 300 and 350 people and all the defense could find was some unrelated Department of Revenue case, Bishop said. "Nitpicking little things is all they could find."

"What you have here is a kid in the cookie jar with a high-priced lawyer," said Bishop of Little. "Find him guilty, because he is guilty."

The trial lasted less than two days. Jury selection - to get a jury of 12 and two alternates from an original panel of 80 - took three days because of prior publicity.

Not only is Little a Pro Bowl lineman but he was also the defendant in a manslaughter case in 1999 in which he admitted he was drunk. In his Lincoln Navigator, he ran a red light downtown and collided with a car driven by Susan Gutweiler, 47, of Oakville, who was killed.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Of course he was aquitted. Just read the testimony of the officer and how his partners testimony were not even the same.

The cops testimony put way to much doubt for the jury not to find him not guilty.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,214
Reaction score
70,497
joeshmo said:
Of course he was aquitted. Just read the testimony of the officer and how his partners testimony were not even the same.

The cops testimony put way to much doubt for the jury not to find him not guilty.

exactly - what is everyone up in arms about - you'd think they were in the courtroom for the entire trial! When did the American become judge, jury and executioner without having any knowledge or hearing arguments or evidence presented in court? Sheesh.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,480
Reaction score
40,104
Location
Las Vegas
cheesebeef said:
exactly - what is everyone up in arms about - you'd think they were in the courtroom for the entire trial! When did the American become judge, jury and executioner without having any knowledge or hearing arguments or evidence presented in court? Sheesh.
agreed!
 

red desert

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
6,221
Reaction score
0
Location
A.B.Q. in da house
joeshmo said:
Of course he was aquitted. Just read the testimony of the officer and how his partners testimony were not even the same.

The cops testimony put way to much doubt for the jury not to find him not guilty.

Thank you.
 

black

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 19, 2004
Posts
3,124
Reaction score
1
Location
girard,Il.
100%CardsFan said:
Please tell me this is an april fools joke.
It has to be, they just started picking the jury Monday for God sakes, its got to be a joke.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,480
Reaction score
40,104
Location
Las Vegas
black said:
It has to be, they just started picking the jury Monday for God sakes, its got to be a joke.

Trials can take less than a day.
 

CardinalLaw

Registered User
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Posts
1,926
Reaction score
0
What a joke.

Anyone of us would still get convicted, and he somehow got the prosecutor to not bring up the manslaughter charge though out the trial. How do the Cops on this board feel about stuff like this. Basicly blow holes through your testimony so an NFL player gets off on this. I guess atleast you got his autograph on the ticket. Its quite stupid if I had a dui manslaughter I guarentee it would be brought up. Just a further mockery of money buys you justice.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,214
Reaction score
70,497
100%CardsFan said:
I dont care if stories didnt match up or whatever, If they took blood and it was over the legal limit he should have been convicted. I know unfortunatly it doesnt work that way.

uh - where did you read that they took blood and it was over the legal limit?
 

100%CardsFan

100% embarrassed
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Posts
7,190
Reaction score
17
Location
THIS ONE IS FOR YOU KOC. TIM WE DID IT.
I guess they dont there. Thats my bad.

Here is what they had on him I guess.

Little was arrested April 24 after police pulled him over for speeding on an interstate. Police said he had bloodshot eyes, smelled of alcohol, failed three roadside sobriety tests and admitted drinking alcohol.

http://orig.citizen-times.com/cache/article/football/56757.shtml
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,214
Reaction score
70,497
100%CardsFan said:
I guess they dont there. Thats my bad.

Here is what they had on him I guess.

Little was arrested April 24 after police pulled him over for speeding on an interstate. Police said he had bloodshot eyes, smelled of alcohol, failed three roadside sobriety tests and admitted drinking alcohol.

http://orig.citizen-times.com/cache/article/football/56757.shtml

yeah - but all of that was blown out of court by another two police officers.
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,757
Reaction score
1,987
Location
On a flying cocoon
cheesebeef said:
exactly - what is everyone up in arms about - you'd think they were in the courtroom for the entire trial! When did the American become judge, jury and executioner without having any knowledge or hearing arguments or evidence presented in court? Sheesh.

Its been that way for a while now. People are pissed off with the judicial system as a whole (you know ... "the rich always get out of it" type arguments) and not to mention the fact that we have gone to the age where we want information NOW. In their eyes, the judicial system takes too long and we should know the day the incident occurs whether the person did or not.

Our society has become so impatient that we've gone to an accused = guilty mindset ... its sad really.
 
Last edited:

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,158
Reaction score
25,070
Location
Killjoy Central
He's still a piece of crap who killed a woman while driving drunk.

I wish the Rams game was being shipped down to Mexico, just so we'd have one less time period in which he might kill someone in Az.

:bang:
 

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
There are one and two day and half-day trials all the time, and probably far more two day trials than two week trials.

Even though I'm as limited to the facts as everybody else, its seems to me if the arresting officer said Little was flapping his arms, leaning against the car, etc..., and the guy's parter, standing five feet away, said he wasn't doing any of those things--and then another cop testified Little acted sober and didn't smell like booze only 18 minutes later--there's reasonable doubt. If Little's blood did come up positive for alcohol, I'm sure some hematologist from somewhere would sell his soul for $1,000 an hour and testify that there was only trace alcohol or maybe no alcohol in Little's blood, for God knows what reason.

As to whether he was impaired, I have no idea.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Once again a rich guy caught DWI is innocent.

Anyone of us poor schmucks get caught, and we fart wrong, we get thrown in the clink.

USA = The new monachy, rich over running the poor........history says a revolution is imminenent.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Hugh Jass said:
As to whether he was impaired, I have no idea.


If he wasn't impaired then he would have taken a sobriety test. Plain and simple.

This is an outrage, and if you don't see it that way then you are doomed to watch rich people get away with whatever they want to in this country. All the while peeing all over the common man.

Sitting back and doing nothing is another name for giving up.
 

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
RugbyMuffin said:
This is an outrage, and if you don't see it that way then you are doomed to watch rich people get away with whatever they want to in this country. All the while peeing all over the common man.

Sitting back and doing nothing is another name for giving up.

Since that's the way it's always been and always will be, wouldn't you be better served trying to get rich--so instead of getting pee'd on, you'll be doing the peeing?
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
810
Location
Bakersfield, CA
I have no problem accepting that he wasn't "legally" drunk but he admitted that he had been drinking (2 beers). With his history, it shows me that he has no appreciation for what he's done and that he's probably been doing it more than this most recent arrest.

The simple truth is that Leonard Little was drinking and driving (again) and he is a slave to alcohol more than his conscience. I don't know if it's sad or stupid. I also don't want to think about being the husband or son of the woman he killed and finding out he got off again. I can't imagine not being consumed with vengeful thoughts.
 

DevonCardsFan

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,819
Reaction score
802
Location
Your Mamas
RugbyMuffin said:
Once again a rich guy caught DWI is innocent.

Anyone of us poor schmucks get caught, and we fart wrong, we get thrown in the clink.

USA = The new monachy, rich over running the poor........history says a revolution is imminenent.

The system is a mockery a complete joke, that caters to the rish and preys on the poor. If any of us who don't have money on the board we would not have the oppurtunity to have a 2nd DUI, we would be rotting in Prison.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,533
Posts
5,436,575
Members
6,330
Latest member
Trainwreck20
Top