- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,758
- Reaction score
- 16,525
Steve, come on... you're talking above about guys who couldn't win a title, but were still in the running every year or at least in the playoffs by the time they were 23. The only thing Book's been in the running for throughout his career has been the #1 pick in the draft. Now, that's not HIS fault. They aren't bad BECAUSE of him. But he's yet to show his game can lift a team for a significant amount of time, to really make them better than they have any business being. Those guys "who couldn't win the big one" until they did were still winning a lot of games and turning their teams into at minimum playoff participants. That just hasn't been anything close to the case with Book.
I wasn't just talking about Jordan and Lebron, the list of HOF players that never won a ring is quite impressive. As is the list of HOF players that didn't make the playoffs until well after their 23rd birthday. And even Jordan led a team to a horrible record, they only won 30 his second season and that was with a much better roster (IMO) than anything Booker has seen until maybe this year.
Anyway, this is a team game and I truly believe that no NBA player has ever dealt with a worse overall situation (caliber of teammates, questionable coaching, heavy roster turnover etc.) than Devin has faced.
None of what I've said offers any support to the idea that Booker will become a truly dominant player, I just maintain that failing to have accomplished it by the age of 23 means almost nothing. And remember, I'm not claiming he will take us to the promised land, I'm arguing against the idea that it has already been established that he will never be able to lead a good team to success.