Agree. I enjoy good movies. The reproductive parts of the lead have zero to do with it.I think this is a common misperception and excuse made by Hollywood why more all female led action movies don’t get made.
Atomic Blonde made 100 million on a 30 million dollar budget. And even though Fury Road was called Mad Max, he was a secondary character to Furiosa and even most of the women in that movie.
Then you have Hunger Games, Underworld, Resident Evil all making a lot of money and spawning big franchises.
The OG Wonder Woman made 400 domestic/800 worldwide and Captain Marvel was a steaming pile but made over a Billion.
Angelina Jolie consistently pumped out big money movie with Tomb Raider 1, Salt, Wanted, Mr. And Mrs. Smith (she was arguably as big or bigger than Pitt at that time). And back in the day, Alien franchised over 3 decades.
The female led action genre definitely has its fair share of bombs too but so have male action movies. The thing that’s really stopped more of female action movies getting made is sexism, not necessarily box office receipts, IMO.
My only ask is semi realism...I don't want to see a 130 lb chick punch a 280lb dude in the face and he flies across the room. There are plenty of ways she can win the fight within the confines of reality.
Imo, having a female action lead is an opportunity for the writers to get creative. Maybe show how she used the environment to dominate a larger opponent....or advanced training...sometimes dumb luck.