I am not sure if it matters if it's good or bad. IMO, there have been good movies performing very poorley at the box office as of late. I personally don't think this means it's going to be bad necessarily. I think it means that the Director was likely asked to come in to do their job without much creative control. Creative control by a director doesn't guarantee success if their vision sucks.
www.forbes.com
Same. I’ve had two three female bosses. One was a black female. They were all outstanding.
I also wonder if they cook the books, Ala Trump, for better tax write offs. Movies always seem like they spend not as much as they say. Just as an outside observer, I have been around 3-4 movies that were filmed in Yuma. The Star Wars set, I can see they spent a TON of money on, just to blow it up later. Another movie though, the set was basically all card board, although through the camera it looked substantial when it finally aired. Then you see what dollar amount they say they spent in your community, and it just feels high. IDK. Just saying it always seemed light on the reported spending and economic impact. I suppose they had receipts for everything?Well, so much for that $130m budget and my theory that it was going to be used to gaslight. Forbes article from today says that the financials for the subsidiary that made it shows that they spent $274.8m and received a $55m subsidy from the UK for filming there. So $219.8 out of pocket.
The $130m honestly sounded way low to me when Vanity Fair reported. Most of the MCU movies of late have been around the $200m mark. VF has removed it from the article too so Im guessing it wasn't accurate. I'm wondering if it was a typo and should have been $230m. Seems more realistic given the other MCU movies and is more in line with the Forbes number. I also find going $45m over budget more believable than going $145m over.
Disney Spent Over $270 Million To Make ‘The Marvels’
Disney has revealed that it spent more than $270 million on making 'The Marvels', the latest installment in its Marvel Comics superhero saga.
7 of the last 10 of my bosses were all women and excellent leaders. One of the male leaders I had was one of the worst bosses I have ever had. Good person but lousy lousy leader. I went nowhere in the organization under him. He stalled my career for YEARS. Within two months of moving to a different team under a female boss I was promoted to my old bosses level and within a year promoted above his level. Now I am way above his level (he is still at the same level to this day) thanks to having great female leaders above me (one of them a minority as well). A really bad boss can tank your career.
The first one stunk and this one doesn't look any better. It's going to crater. Rightfully so.
I watched the other two Marvels on Disney+. Still I am not that excited for it. Partially their trailers suck.
Yeah… I don’t think one bombs because people won’t go see female led action movies. It bombs because the first one was bad and they’ve totally devalued the character by lumping her in with two tv characters to make it seem like Ms. Marvel isn’t enough of a character to stand on her own two feet.
Agree. This movie all of the sudden went from TV movie to real movie?! The vibe is completely different. Who is handling the marketing on this?!?!
I enjoyed ''Kate"" & ''Gunpowder Milkshake'' as well. Both were good female lead action movies.
Same as Widows, Peppermint, and The Old Guard.
That high?
