I'm not really sure what the problem is though.
First of all, the Suns trading Penny for Dickerson would be like TNT trading John Thomson for Bill Walton.
With Penny making what he makes, it's hard for me to think of an actual trade cenario that the Suns would get genuinely wripped off to be a part of.
But that trade with the Grizzlies would be.
The arguement that Dickerson will either return to the court and be his old self or retire, which would work out in our favor, is flat out ludicrous.
Look at Penny, look at Grant Hill, look at Tom Gugliota, look at Vince Carter, look at Danny Manning, look at Bobby Hurley.
Besides, Michael Dickerson's "old self" isn't something the Phoenix Suns or any other team should exactly be coveting at this juncture in.. well, in reality...
And who was it, I'd like to ask, that suggested we get Bryant Reeves?
Right now, Penny seems to be a perfect fit for the Suns.
They don't need top-tier scorer.
They have Marbury.
They don't need a soft, not able to take the hit in the lane and finish, jump shooting rebounder.
We already have Shawn Marion (Just kidding!!!! I love Shawn)
What we need is a guy who can score efficiently in the flow of the offense, can help out on the boards and keep other guys involved.
Penny's stats since he returned to the starting lineup are:
13.5 ppg (48% from the field) 5.3 rebounds, 3.6 assists per game.
On average, he only shoots about 12.3 times a game since returning.
The bottom line is, however, that we're not going to get Penny's worth, both on the court and on the payroll, in a trade.
Penny is worth more than his trade value.
But he's worth less than his contract would argue.
Therefore, anything we do with Penny Hardaway on the trade front would more likely hurt the team more than it does help us.
Oh, and I just want to know something for future reference.
Is this easier for you guys to read?