MMQB: Peter King posts all 32 teams' 2008 Cap Space

DaisyCutter

Hall of Famer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Posts
1,718
Reaction score
0
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/12/09/week14/4.html

Washington is apparently $20.72 million over the projected cap. Arizona's 9th on King's list, with $30.27 available. The problem? Every team above them has 39 or more players already under contract going into next season. The Cardinals have only 34. Buffalo and San Francisco seem to be in the catbirds' seats heading into free agency, since they're both $30+ million under the cap and have 49 and 48 players, respectively, under contract.

The bad news is that 18 teams have $20 million or more in 2008 salary open right now. Look for a lot of end-of-season extensions to be forthcoming, because there aren't going to be a lot of players to go around.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,127
Reaction score
39,698
Well it's a good thing we structured those deals to free up money for the 08 Free agent pool then isn't it?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,047
Reaction score
58,936
Location
SoCal
i hope we save some for the june 1st cuts!!!























for those playing at home, that's sarcasm, not a lie
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Well, I'd like to hear from Joeshmo on this.

I take it that, this figure includes Fitz's highly inflated number, which would be subject to a new deal. And, the $6m presently on the books for Gandy, that, again, would be subject to re-negotiation.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
Graves has already let us know we won't do much in free agency this year. I believe he means it.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,994
Reaction score
5,237
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Rod Graves has already gone on record that the Cards will not be active in free agency this off season. They need to restructure contracts for Fitzgerald and Boldin. They also want to resign Dansby and Pace. Additionally they need to make decisions on Berry and Okeafor as both have good size contracts.

Bottom line is don't expect any big agent signings. The draft will be the key for building the team.
 
OP
OP
D

DaisyCutter

Hall of Famer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Posts
1,718
Reaction score
0
Rod Graves has already gone on record that the Cards will not be active in free agency this off season. They need to restructure contracts for Fitzgerald and Boldin. They also want to resign Dansby and Pace. Additionally they need to make decisions on Berry and Okeafor as both have good size contracts.

Bottom line is don't expect any big agent signings. The draft will be the key for building the team.

Fitzgerald I understand. He apparently has a really high cap number next season, and he's earned a new contract. But why extend/upgrade Anquan Boldin? Why does the 55th receiver in the NFL deserve a pay raise? He already has the 10th-highest cap number on the team.
 

SuperSpck

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Posts
7,977
Reaction score
15
Location
Iowa
I'm still going to hope like hades that Bob Sanders makes it to FA somehow and then Cards players drag him here and force him to sign...

That'd be a saftey duo, and we don't have to worry about Sanders coverage or speed.
 

ThunderCard

Registered User
Joined
Nov 10, 2003
Posts
1,679
Reaction score
21
Location
Denver
Rod Graves has already gone on record that the Cards will not be active in free agency this off season. They need to restructure contracts for Fitzgerald and Boldin. They also want to resign Dansby and Pace. Additionally they need to make decisions on Berry and Okeafor as both have good size contracts.

Bottom line is don't expect any big agent signings. The draft will be the key for building the team.

I hate **** like this. Look how much we are under the cap and we can not spend like a normal team. It just does not make any sense from a football standpoint and severely limits our depth.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,127
Reaction score
39,698
I hate **** like this. Look how much we are under the cap and we can not spend like a normal team. It just does not make any sense from a football standpoint and severely limits our depth.

They are planning to use most of the room to keep our existing players under contract.

There isn't going to be a ton of guy in FA anyways because the cap goes up again. This is the point many of us made this offseason when told the FO was frontloading contracts to have more caproom for next year in free agency, we said "who are they going to sign there won't be much out there?"

They frontloaded contracts last year and restructured some, and they'll probably do the same this year, use your available cap with a just a few key signings here and there.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Washington is apparently $20.72 million over the projected cap. Arizona's 9th on King's list, with $30.27 available. The problem? Every team above them has 39 or more players already under contract going into next season. The Cardinals have only 34. Buffalo and San Francisco seem to be in the catbirds' seats heading into free agency, since they're both $30+ million under the cap and have 49 and 48 players, respectively, under contract.

The bad news is that 18 teams have $20 million or more in 2008 salary open right now. Look for a lot of end-of-season extensions to be forthcoming, because there aren't going to be a lot of players to go around.

How many guys are under contract is misleading. How many of those free agents will be RFA or EFA's. Also how many of the guys under contract are just PS players that got 2 year contracts.

Also those cap figures do not include escalators, incentives or roster bonuses becuase they havent been earned yet so they cant be counted yet.

For example Fitz big incentive is not included yet and we actually only have about 22 mill.

But it is a great example to show just how much money will be in the free agent market and how many players will be extended before MArch 1st.

Edit- King did include roster bonuses.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,048
Posts
5,431,300
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top