Again? I thought you wanted an emotionless, objective argument. I could inject concerns I have about leadership and dedication, but that’s not what you wanted.
The problem I have with Murray-Stans is that none of them will acknowledge his many outliers as potential risks and assume he’s a fail-same prospect. He may wind up being a good QB, but it comes with a high degree of risk. He’s not Andrew Luck. He’s not Peyton Manning. These guys were plug-and-play players, even though Peyton had a significant learning curve his first season.
If you’re comfortable burning the #1 pick on him, trading Rosen for pennies on the dollar, and letting your division rival get one of the best defensive prospects in the draft, by all means. But there’s a good chance that Rosen, Bosa and Williams will thrive elsewhere and that Murray doesn’t live up to his potential.
I can acknowledge the red flags, like height and weight.
I just also see an NFL that is evolving before our very eyes. Hitting QB's, pass interference, the way the rules are adjudicated, is all changing rapidly.
The future of the QB position is not immobile QB's. Pocket passers, yes..... But not Drew Bledsoe level mobility.
We have no clue what a trade for Rosen will earn. But it seems fool hearty to disclose your hand before the bet is made.
How can you say that there is a good chance for Bosa, Rosen, & Williams but not for Murray? Again, it sounds like your defending a personal preference rather than being practical.
What about Rosen's performance, in college or the Pro's gives you any indication he will be anything better than an Andy Dalton level QB?