If Nowitski has any class, he'll say something like this when he accepts his MVP trophy.What a crime that Dirk will win the MVP this year... a real shame.
I don't deserve this trophy. It doesn't belong with me. I will never be able to look at it and feel pride.
So I am giving it to Steve Nash, with a plaque saying, "YOU'VE EARNED THIS, MY FRIEND. DISPLAY IT NEXT TO YOUR TWO OTHER MVP TROPHIES."
Even the great point guards like Magic, Stockton, Thomas, etc. didn't have what Steve has had the past 3 years. What IT is, I'm not sure... but it seems to be 'all' the tools. He can drive, shoot, pass, dribble, lead, step up in big moments, and handle the media/pressure...
uh, Magic has 5 freaking rings, multiple regular season MVPs and FINALS MVPs - i think it's INCREDIBLE hubris to suggest Nash has something Magic or Isiah didn't. I mean, Magic is without a doubt the greatest PG of all time and one of the top 3 players of all time. And Thomas was the heart and soul of the Pistons who won two titles, and who overcame legendary Celtic teams and the Lakers. To suggest he didn't have "it" either is pretty off-base.
Steve is incredible and has been a savior ina league that had become dreadfully boring, but he has something Magic doesn't? I don't think so.
Maybe he was referring to Magic himself who actually admitted as much on national television the other day.
that's because Magic is and has always been too humble to compare himself to the greats. Do you believe Nash has "it" where Magic didn't? I think that would be a damn hard argument to make. I mean, as a ROOKIE, the guy played out of position and won a close-out game by himself, starting at C scoring 42 points and grabbing 15 boards, while dishing out 7 assists... ON THE ROAD. If that ain't "it" I don't know what the hell is.
I think comparing Magic to Nash or vice versa is unfair. Magic was in a league of his own and may even be the best basketball player of all time. Also Magic was 6'8" and could play all five positions on the court well. I heard Magic talk about Steve and what I took away from it is... somebody is playing basketball again the way it should be played and about time.
I think the better comparison for Steve Nash is John Stockton.
that's because Magic is and has always been too humble to compare himself to the greats. Do you believe Nash has "it" where Magic didn't? I think that would be a damn hard argument to make. I mean, as a ROOKIE, the guy played out of position and won a close-out game by himself, starting at C scoring 42 points and grabbing 15 boards, while dishing out 7 assists... ON THE ROAD. If that ain't "it" I don't know what the hell is.
I don't think putting words into my mouth is quite what I was getting at, but more power to you.
What I interpreted Magic saying was that he was good at some things, Stockton was good at some others--Nash is more of the healthy middle--being great at everything (although to be fair, Magic was more than great in the things he was good at).