NCAA reinstates Dwayne Jarrett

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,568
Reaction score
40,375
THe NCAA has ruled that although Jarrett clearly did get an extra benefit by not paying full rent living with Leinart, he will not miss any games over it. he has to pay $5,532 to a charity of his choice, and then he'll be fully reinstated.

My guess is this is the real holdup with Matt's contract,he wanted to find out how much money Jarrett needed before he signed.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Russ Smith said:
THe NCAA has ruled that although Jarrett clearly did get an extra benefit by not paying full rent living with Leinart, he will not miss any games over it. he has to pay $5,532 to a charity of his choice, and then he'll be fully reinstated.

My guess is this is the real holdup with Matt's contract,he wanted to find out how much money Jarrett needed before he signed.

Did USC invent Teflon? Not even one game by the in house rules. Oh, a school has to have rules.
 
OP
OP
Russ Smith

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,568
Reaction score
40,375
wallyburger said:
Did USC invent Teflon? Not even one game by the in house rules. Oh, a school has to have rules.

Worse than that, Carroll has been publicly predicting for weeks that Jarrett would not miss any games. IN other words even before he knew the final NCAA ruling, he'd already decided that USC football would NOT suspend him any games themselves. It's not a huge deal the claim is Jarrett just figured because it was Leinart's dad, it was OK, but it is interesting to find out that USC only found out about this when Scott Wolf(the same reporter who broke the Brandon Ting steroid story and started the LenDale White marijuana rumor before the draft which turns out to be false) broke the story. Wolf reported it and said it was a violation, and Carroll immediately said they had no idea of the living arrangement.

The interesting case is going to be the Bush family situation. Bush is in the NFL, the NCAA can't touch him. A reporter has already come out and said he knew of the situation several months before the story broke on Yahoo, that he found out from a USC coach, and that the claim by Carroll that the coaches and Reggie himself were totally unaware of it is complete BS, they all knew and were simply of the opinion that it was OK because it didn't involve Reggie just his family. This reporter(not Wolf) says he even mentioned in a blog although I've yet to see that Blog to verify that. He's apparently relayed all this information to the NCAA but who knows what will happen there.

The case against Sanchez was dropped when the girl involved conveniently declined to go forward marking a remarkable run of arrests with the same outcome for USC. 2005 CB Eric Wright charged with assault, Wright transfers out of USC reportedly under pressure, but the DA decides there's insufficient evidence and doesn't file charges. 2006 Sanchez is charged with sexual assault by a 19 year old girl, but the DA declined to press charges after the girl declined to pursue it, the DA said there was insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt since the girl doesn't want to testify. Then you have the Rey Maualuga arrest for assault after repeatedly punching another student at a party. Again, remarkably the fellow student declines to press charges, and the DA decides there's insufficient evidence to press charges against Rey. Consider the source but folks on the UCLA board say the guy he hit was so black and blue both of his eyes were nearly closed, and that Rey had bruising on both hands consistent with having beaten the crap out of someone, but apparently it's not as easy as it looks on CSI.

One would hope all the scrutiny USC has been under this offseason will result in a little more control of the program.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Russ Smith said:
One would hope all the scrutiny USC has been under this offseason will result in a little more control of the program.

When the Hell will USC at least throw the NCAA and the rest of college football a bone and let one of these transgressions get punished? Just wonder who is buying off these recalcitrant witnesses and how much it costs for a case of memory fade.

The Frosty Rucker girlfriend beatings , if only fractionally true, is deplorable. To see it go away is mind numbing. She wants to prosecute and still can't get a DA to wake up.

Reminds me of the Ray Lewis, U of Miami, look the other way attitude. That worked out real well , didn't it. He never got in trouble again. Just ask Ray Lollar and Jacintha Baker how they feel about, boys just being boys.

Sorry, I am not really excited.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Just read this article on the subject.

Farrell's SportingBlog
Why do so many elite recruits go astray?
August 7, 2006

The Sproting News

It's a menace that's threatening society, a terror so real it's affecting the sleeping habits of thousands of people across the nation. It's not global warming or the crisis in the Middle East . . . it's college football players. And is it me or are they getting dumber every year? Of special interest to recruiting geeks like me, it seems that the more stars you get when being ranked, the more brain cells you can lose. The correlation between five-star studs and trouble is so astonishing that I'm half expecting one of this year's five star crop to call me and ask to be dropped to four, just to be safe.

This has been quite a stretch when it comes to transgressions by former five-star recruits. From Miami, Fla. to Norman, Okla. and stops in between, some very stupid things are occurring just weeks before practice begins. I call it the "five star sickness" because so many former top high school prospects seem to regress intellectually once they arrive at a school of higher learning. Let's take a quick looksee:

Rhett Bomar was a five-star stud out of Texas back in 2004 when he signed with Oklahoma. This was to be his breakout year and he had a very good chance to lead the Sooners to a BCS bowl game. But that won't happen now. Bomar was dismissed from the team for violating NCAA rules by working at a private business and taking "payment over an extended period of time in excess of time actually worked." Allegedly Bomar worked around five hours a week at a car dealership while filing for 40-hour weeks. He made up to $18,000 for basically working a lunch hour each day of the week. Good work if you can get it, unless you're the star quarterback of a Big 12 power.

Bomar worked at Big Red Sports/Imports, the same company that was involved in the recent Adrian Peterson (five-star 2004) controversy. Peterson, the nation's No. 1 overall prospect in the same class as Bomar, allegedly bought a car without the proper financing, drove it around for a couple weeks and then returned it. He was cleared after an internal investigation because the dealership said it was normal business practice. Oddly, no car dealership has ever shown me the same courtesy, but maybe I wasn't asking right.

Bomar had also been in trouble due to possession of alcohol by a minor on two different occasions. Nothing came of the first but the second led to six months probation. Almost everyone I knew in college drank underage, so that's more of a "boys will be boys" deal, except none of us had the potential to make millions in the NFL. We were jeopardizing our future as salesmen, brokers, landscapers and janitors. Not as much to lose, no?

But Bomar isn't the only five-star knucklehead to emerge recently. Linebacker Tray Blackmon of Auburn, the nation's top linebacker and a five-star stud in 2005, was suspended for three games last week after an alcohol-related arrest in June where his blood alcohol level was reportedly twice the legal limit, not so good for someone underage.

Miami wide receiver Ryan Moore (five-star in 2002) was suspended for the first two games of this season, a continuation of his suspension that kept him out of last year's Peach Bowl for a "violation of team policy". The "violation of team policy" is the scariest term in college football, apparently ranging from missing a study hall to war crimes. I don't have a guess as to what Moore did to miss three games, but I can guess that it wasn't something smart.

Oh, and here's my favorite. Arkansas running back Darren McFadden (five-star in 2005) had surgery last past week to repair a dislocated toe. Nothing wrong there, right? Running backs injure their toes all the time, right? Sure they do, but not by kicking someone repeatedly in a brawl. McFadden injured the toe when his shoe came off after allegedly kicking a man repeatedly in a fight outside a bar. The same bar had been closed down in 2004 by a judge after two people had been killed there and more than 30 other crimes or incidents had been reported. It re-opened in January of 2005, something Houston Nutt has to be just thrilled about.

I've talked about former FSU wide receiver Fred Rouse (five-star in 2005) being arrested for breaking and entering an apartment of a teammate. I've talked about defensive tackle Callahan Bright (five-star in 2005) who missed most of his senior football season for allegedly going into the stands after a heckling fan and was last seen on his myspace.com page smoking something that looked quite illegal. I've talked about running back Jason Gwaltney (five-star 2005) who transferred from West Virginia to Nassau Community College after his freshman season and has put himself in a deep enough academic hole where it's uncertain when he'll play college football again. I've talked about defensive end Melvin Alaeze (five-star 2005) who was released from his Letter of Intent by Maryland after a drug arrest and has surfaced at Illinois.

And I don't think I need to go into the Willie Williams (five-star 2004) saga with Miami or get into the situation with former South Carolina running back Demetris Summers (five-star 2003). USC quarterback Mark Sanchez (five-star 2005) was arrested and detained on sexual assault charges although most felt it was a bogus arrest (and was dismissed a month later due to a lack of sufficient evidence). Former Purdue linebacker Kyle Williams (five-star 2004) was arrested on charges of assault and confinement late in 2005. Oh and I almost forgot, a guy named Marcus Vick (five-star 2002) has had some issues as well.

So what is it about the five-stars? We give five-star rankings to only 25-30 players each year and since 2002 all of the above have landed in hot water. Is it about entitlement? Does the recruiting process itself, with all the warm fuzzies and "you're the best I've ever seen" phrases being tossed around like horseshoes at a backyard cookout make kids think they're bulletproof? Or does the notoriety that comes with such status lead to a college life under the microscope and wrought with more temptations than those who are more "star challenged"? There are many questions but few answers.

Whatever it is, there seems to be a direct correlation and, worthless as I am, I don't have a solution for it. Recruits will be ranked from now until we're all flying around in mini-spaceships because the industry has become so big and following the process itself is addicting. I've received a lot of phone calls over the years from players, parents and coaches wondering what it will take to be ranked as a five-star. Not one has asked what it takes to drop from a five to a four. Yet.
 
OP
OP
Russ Smith

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,568
Reaction score
40,375
To be fair, the Sanchez case is pretty hard to judge. There's conflicting stories, no witnesses, and because she didn't immediately report the case, the suspicion is she got drunk, slept with a guy, and then felt bad about it later and cried rape. Sanchez has contended all along it was consensual. So in his case it's certainly conceivable she chose not to press charges because she made it up. In the WRight and Malauga case everything you read points to a cop or DA simply choosing to do a favor for a USC player by dropping a case that had plenty of evidence. It's pretty well documented that Wright left USC because he was told to, that it wasn't his first problem there in a very short time, and the theory is they basically told him we'll get the charges dropped, but you're not going to USC.

No school is clean, UCLA hired a strength trainer this year who was busted for distributing steroids nearly 20 years ago, and was in his own problems since then at 2 other jobs. Dorrell claimed he didn't know about it before he hired him, but he knows now and the guy still works for UCLA football.

But given the stuff going on at USC recently one would think they'd at least try to clean up their image a bit. But then you read the wearesc board and they're all convinced Carroll is a saint and their players are being persecuted because they win too much.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,222
Posts
5,453,389
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top