GuernseyCard
ASFN Icon
If we are paying players based on select performances then Drake is getting $15m
We're a solid rushing offence with a higher per carry average to the left
Help me out... who is on the left side of the 0-line?
If we are paying players based on select performances then Drake is getting $15m
We're a solid rushing offence with a higher per carry average to the left
Help me out... who is on the left side of the 0-line?
Hump had the worst run blocking grade of his career this season
Proving that PFF is a joke!
Trust your eyes.
PFF is a joke, but you want to use their 2 sacks allowed stat.
Has anyone reported more?
No idea. But you cant have it both ways. You can't say PFF is a joke and then stand on their 2 sacks allowed.
Because according to them our starting 5 only gave up 13 sacks all year. Which is a joke. We had 50 sacks.
All the more reason for us to go for it.Chargers likely cut Tyrod if they draft someone like Herbert.
Kliff identified that what he wanted to do wasn't working and then tried something slightly different. It wasn't just the line, Kyler being a rookie and us not having dynamic WRs also contributed.None of that is what I said.
I said we had to change scheme to accommodate the O line. In other words Kliff had to abandon what he wanted to do for what a the O line could cope with.
Do you think this O line is good?
I think this line is ok. I don't think it gets better by subtracting pieces. That is where we differ. I think this team can survive paying 14 mil for average production at LT when we have a bottom 5 RT as well. As long as we also use the #8 pick on a player who can win the RT battle with Murray and play LT if Humphries injuries re-occur.Let's be clear here. Those people arguing that we should extend Hump answer this very simple question.
Do you think this O line is good?
Unless some other reporting agency is saying he gave up more than two sacks, it's simply the agreed upon consensus.
You're the one, ad nauseam, making the dubious case that we should drop DJ for a draft pick and some 37/38 year old or some similar brain fantasy supported by nothing more than animus and conjecture.
Corey Littleton from the Rams at about 7-10 million per year.
Schobert or Martinez pique my interest. I can't envision spending for Littleton.
I'm fine with Van Noy. I'm gonna be honest, 3-4 ILB is probably the position I'm the worst at understanding, but from what I read, Schobert's got coverage skills, and we need someone to handle the TE. Seems like the best fit to patch up our issues there, if we really don't feel Simmons is going to be available.
He's going to get 12m+ though right?
I agree. I'm just hoping we could get him for a little bit less than Littleton.I fear Schobert is going to get 10m+ too. Young, Pro bowl, coverage skills.
Martinez is good in coverage also but offers little in the run game I like Schobert more but may be to expensive. Littleton is the prize but expensive. There are a couple ILB I like in the draft but I would want to see some 40 times and agility drills before I'm sold on them because they may not be fast or athletic enough to be anything more then 2 down lbs and st. playersSchobert or Martinez pique my interest. I can't envision spending for Littleton.
I'm fine with Van Noy. I'm gonna be honest, 3-4 ILB is probably the position I'm the worst at understanding, but from what I read, Schobert's got coverage skills, and we need someone to handle the TE. Seems like the best fit to patch up our issues there, if we really don't feel Simmons is going to be available.
For ILB, I think the Cardinals bring in a vet and draft a mid round guy.
I just cant see why it would be smart to invest over $16 million at ILB. Hicks was actually pretty good last year, not great but solid. Add another solid guy and the defense will be fine at ILB.