Nebraska gone to Big 10

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
orangebloods.com is reporting that a Nebraska regent has told them that the decision to join the Big 10 is a done deal and an announcement will come Friday.

ESPN's Chris Mortensen is reporting that the Big 10 has made a formal offer to Nebraska to join the conference and that AD Tom Osborne has informed his staff of the coming changes.

The dominoes are falling.

PS- Sorry about the typo in the title
 

Tyler

Registered
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
2,461
Reaction score
1
Im going to laugh if Mizzou winds up in the Sun Belt or something.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Nebraska gives the Big 10 twelve teams. They can create two divisions and have their league bowl game just like the SEC does.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
The Big 12 is going to go the way of the old SWC. It might not happen this year, but it will happen.
 
OP
OP
Renz

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
The Big 12 is going to go the way of the old SWC. It might not happen this year, but it will happen.

Absolutely. Look at the Big 12 North now: Colorado, Iowa St., Kansas, Kansas St. & Missouri. Terrible.

Why wouldn't the Big 12 South (most likely substituting Colorado for Baylor) join the Pac-10 now?

They would be exchanging the Big 12 North for USC, UCLA, ASU, Arizona, Oregon, Cal, Washington etc. It's a no-brainer.
 

Tyler

Registered
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
2,461
Reaction score
1
I dont know how I feel about ASU and UA playing in the same sub conference as Texas and OU. Scary prospect.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
There were indications the Big 10 wanted Nebraska, Missouri, and three teams with northeastern TV exposure. If they've ditched those plans (say, Syracuse), then Missouri is definitely out.
 

Tyler

Registered
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
2,461
Reaction score
1
Honest question here.

When Nebraska goes to the little 11, will they too play 7 cupcake games followed by maybe 4 or 5 "decent" games ala Ohio State and Michigan?
 

splitsecond

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Posts
5,582
Reaction score
1,536
Location
Chandler, AZ
I dont know how I feel about ASU and UA playing in the same sub conference as Texas and OU. Scary prospect.

I think UA is poised to at least ATTEMPT to compete since we already have good TX recruiting connections and a Stoops, but I can't say the same for ASU. They need to get their act together and fire Erickson before this realignment begins scheduling games.
 
OP
OP
Renz

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
I dont know how I feel about ASU and UA playing in the same sub conference as Texas and OU. Scary prospect.

There will be growing pains, but it will only help ASU and UA football recruiting in the long run.

It especially helps UA who already recruits extensively in Texas and Oklahoma. It will help ASU make inroads there as well and there's a wealth of talent in those states.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
I dont know how I feel about ASU and UA playing in the same sub conference as Texas and OU. Scary prospect.

Well, as a person who has attended both Texas A&M and ASU, I can tell you it would be pretty damn brutal for ASU. A&M had a fantastic run in football for about 15 years, but once they slipped Texas and OU have had a hammerlock on recruiting in Texas. ASU would have a hard time competing with Tech, A&M and Ok State too.

For college baseball, it would be off-the-hook overloaded with power teams. And, it would be the toughest football sub conference in the nation IMO. Even in basketball, both UofA and ASU would find it far more challenging than the current PAC 10.

That said, ASU can't play scared. They need the money. There are no other options for ASU.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
There will be growing pains, but it will only help ASU and UA football recruiting in the long run.

It especially helps UA who already recruits extensively in Texas and Oklahoma. It will help ASU make inroads there as well and there's a wealth of talent in those states.

That will cut both ways. Those schools will open up inroads into California and Arizona too. Recruiting in Texas against Texas and Oklahoma is already brutal.

In the end, it will be about getting the right coaches in place to compete in the new conference for both ASU and UofA.
 

splitsecond

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Posts
5,582
Reaction score
1,536
Location
Chandler, AZ
Well, as a person who has attended both Texas A&M and ASU, I can tell you it would be pretty damn brutal for ASU. A&M had a fantastic run in football for about 15 years, but once they slipped Texas and OU have had a hammerlock on recruiting in Texas. ASU would have a hard time competing with Tech, A&M and Ok State too.

For college baseball, it would be off-the-hook overloaded with power teams. And, it would be the toughest football sub conference in the nation IMO. Even in basketball, both UofA and ASU would find it far more challenging than the current PAC 10.

That said, ASU can't play scared. They need the money. There are no other options for ASU.

Hopefully Lisa Love isn't smart enough to find this forum, but she would a complete buffoon not to start looking at going after Mike Leach.
 
OP
OP
Renz

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
That will cut both ways. Those schools will open up inroads into California and Arizona too. Recruiting in Texas against Texas and Oklahoma is already brutal.

UA and ASU can't go head-to-head against UO and UT. That's not what I'm saying.

There is plenty of talent there to go around after Texas and Oklahoma take the players they want. And Texas already recruits California very well.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
UA does not recruit Texas well. They do OK. ASU has never done well and doesn't even put in the effort anymore.

That's not going to change with this. You're still competing against the same schools: Texas, A&M, Oklahoma, Nebraska, LSU, Arkansas, Notre Dame, BYU, and any SEC school that tries to come in cherry pick. That's never going to change.

It's a treacherous drive to get from Dallas or Houston to any major city in Arizona -- nothing like the 4 to 6 hours it takes to get there from SoCal. That's never going to change.

But good luck if you think either school should go "all in" on the Texas recruiting. I predict dismal failure.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,752
Reaction score
6,689
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Well, as a person who has attended both Texas A&M and ASU, I can tell you it would be pretty damn brutal for ASU. A&M had a fantastic run in football for about 15 years, but once they slipped Texas and OU have had a hammerlock on recruiting in Texas. ASU would have a hard time competing with Tech, A&M and Ok State too.
True, but I really doubt ASU and UA's feelings were considered that much in this whole thing. Both of us will be okay if the right leadership is in place (which of course spurs a whole other debate because no Cat or Devil can honestly say with 100% certainty that they have their guy at the head job in hoops or football). Doing this will ensure revenues that will allow both schools never having to watch a successful coach flee to a big money job elsewhere. This conference would at the very least be comparable to the SEC and their lowest paid coaches make more than Stoops and Erickson.

For college baseball, it would be off-the-hook overloaded with power teams. And, it would be the toughest football sub conference in the nation IMO. Even in basketball, both UofA and ASU would find it far more challenging than the current PAC 10.
I don't know baseball, but in hoops it would be like the Big East. Seven or eight teams in the conversation every year. The Pac-10 Basketball Tournament would be quite the event.

That said, ASU can't play scared. They need the money. There are no other options for ASU.
Unless the Arizona schools wants to end up in the MWC they have no choice. This will be good for both of us in the long run, both AD's are running on fumes financially and creating the best conference in college athletics will drive in huge donations and dollars. Without even knowing the TV contracts, just the sheer amount of fans and national interest these new schools are going to bring when traveling or otherwise are going to be huge for the school and local economy's books.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,752
Reaction score
6,689
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
UA does not recruit Texas well. They do OK. ASU has never done well and doesn't even put in the effort anymore.
Agreed, it will help Arizona and ASU but as long as Oklahoma and Texas remain among the country's elite then we will be left out in the cold. Hell, UCLA hasn't been good in years and they still outrecruit the AZ schools in SoCal.

But good luck if you think either school should go "all in" on the Texas recruiting. I predict dismal failure.
Massive failure. The Stoops name and the local connections on the AZ staff will go a bit further than the Erickson name and whoever he has recruiting Texas, but the goal will always be to find unheralded kids or studs that the big boys want to play at their non-preferred position. The next Vince Young or Adrian Peterson ain't going to Tempe or Tucson just because they play in the same conference.

The goal will be just like any other school - build a fence around your home base, find some diamonds in the rough, and hope land something big here and there in the deeper talent pools.
 
Last edited:

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
I don't know baseball, but in hoops it would be like the Big East. Seven or eight teams in the conversation every year. The Pac-10 Basketball Tournament would be quite the event.

Yes, it would. And, since you know college hoops well don't you think OU-Ok St, UT-A&M and Colo-Tech would be tougher travel games than Wash-WSU, the Oregon schools, and the Bay area schools? I guess Colo-Tech in recent years shouldn't be too tough for good programs, but the other two pairs would be a bitch. IMO
 
Last edited:

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
The goal will be just like any other school - build a fence around your home base, find some diamonds in the rough, and hope land something big here and there in the deeper talent pools.

That's how Tech and Ok St. broke through there in recent years. Both schools got some top talent, but they did a fantastic job getting the 2-star and 3-star recruits, who wouldn't even get sniffed by UT-OU, and fitting them into their systems. And, frankly, that's where ASU has been terribly weak over the past decade. So few of our more lightly regarded recruits seem to outperform the recruiting guides.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Honest question here.

When Nebraska goes to the little 11, will they too play 7 cupcake games followed by maybe 4 or 5 "decent" games ala Ohio State and Michigan?

I can imagine an East & West division set up.

West


Nebraska
Iowa
Minnesota
Illinois
Northwestern
Wisconsin

East

Penn State
Ohio State
Purdue
Indiana
Michigan
Michigan State

each division would have 2 cupcakes and 2 cornerstones.

5 games in their own division and 2-3 out of division. Leaves 3-4 games Out of Conference.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
Who said that? UA and ASU will always recruit heavily in California, but any school that ignores Texas are fools.

Neither school ignores Texas right now. Having the Texas schools in conference isn't going to swing the Arizona schools either way in recruiting.
 
Top