New line up, good or bad?

[SirStefan32]

In the last few games he's played, Childress has been really good, but I see what you're saying. I do think, however, that Childress is more active than Grant Hill, especially on the offensive boards. I think Childress is by far our best offensive rebounder--better even than Gortat in that regard.

Oh absolutely! I am very impressed with Josh. He is quickly becoming one of my favorite players. If he can develop his long range shoot, I think he can be an all-star.

 

[AzStevenCal]

Oh absolutely! I am very impressed with Josh. He is quickly becoming one of my favorite players. If he can develop his long range shoot, I think he can be an all-star.

I don't think he'll ever develop that long range shot. This is the same player he was at Stanford. I like the guy's game and I've been disappointed that we've used him too little but I guess they've decided he just doesn't fit with Nash and is too similar to Hill and Dudley to be given a fair chance. It's too bad because the guy gives his all every time he goes out there.

Steve

 

[sunsfan88]

Where is Pietrus btw?

 

[NashDishesDimes]

Its definitley the best line up they have now, but obviously not very good. They need to trade Nash to a contender, let brooks start, and loose the wrest of the games so they get a good draft pick and draft a PF.

Next years starters: Brooks, Dudley, Hill, drafted PF, and Gortat. This is still not very good obviously but atleast they can build around Brooks, drafted PF, and Gortat through free agency and trades...

 

[Chaplin]

Where is Pietrus btw?

Do you not follow the team? You post about them every day yet you don't know who Al McCoy is and don't know that Pietrus has been injured for the last 4 games?