Cbus cardsfan
Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 21,463
- Reaction score
- 7,632
Green has stated before that he likes guys from winning,big-time programs early in the draft because they're more NFL ready. There's no way he'll change it to take a losing QB from Vanderbilt. I can see him taking Young but there's absolutely zero chance he'll take Cutler. Culpepper was a winning QB. Look at Green's first 2 drafts here.
Fitz, Dansby,Dockett, Step all from top level schools in 2004
Rolle,Arrington,Green,Blackstock,Brown in 2005.Same thing
Why is he going to change strategy in 2006? Does Cutler really bring more to the table than a 3rd year Navarre who Green repeatedly praises? Young would at least bring another dimension and could turn into a superstar. There's just alot of questions to him. From what i've seen of Cutler at the combine and senior bowl shows me he's a product of QB hype. I would rather get our big name, big school player at 10 and take Whitehurst/Broyle/ Jacobs later in the draft. They have every bit as good a chance to be successful as Cutler.
Fitz, Dansby,Dockett, Step all from top level schools in 2004
Rolle,Arrington,Green,Blackstock,Brown in 2005.Same thing
Why is he going to change strategy in 2006? Does Cutler really bring more to the table than a 3rd year Navarre who Green repeatedly praises? Young would at least bring another dimension and could turn into a superstar. There's just alot of questions to him. From what i've seen of Cutler at the combine and senior bowl shows me he's a product of QB hype. I would rather get our big name, big school player at 10 and take Whitehurst/Broyle/ Jacobs later in the draft. They have every bit as good a chance to be successful as Cutler.