Going for 2 there is a dumb decision every time, just like the 4th down fade play call in the other game. Both worked, but man, really stupid decisions.
I feel like we regularly tell our coaches to keep their foot on the gas, go for the throat. Play for the win. But Gannon did, and we question the thought. It wouldn't really have occurred top me. Take the points (granted, its now a 35 yard XP), and move along. But going for two, with the run game clicking, and then making victory an easier proposition, and not guaranteeing a loss by missing, was an inspired decision IMO.
It's interesting, because if the consideration of going for 2 has anything to do with the fact the the K was just signed that week, and not having full trust in him, you do exactly that by making his leg the reason for the win, and not KM, JC, MHJ.